Human overpopulation

"Overpopulate" and "Overpopulating" redirect here. For the general concept of overpopulation, see Overpopulation.
Graph of human population from 10,000 BCE to 2000 CE. It shows the extremely rapid growth in the world population that has taken place since the eighteenth century.
Map of population density by country, per square kilometer. (See List of countries by population density.)
Areas of high population densities, calculated in 1994
Map of countries and territories by fertility rate (See List of countries and territories by fertility rate.)
Human population growth rate in percent, with the variables of births, deaths, immigration, and emigration – 2013

Human overpopulation occurs if the number of people in a group exceeds the carrying capacity of the place occupied by that group. Overpopulation can further be viewed, in a long term perspective, as existing when a population cannot be maintained given the rapid depletion of non-renewable resources or given the degradation of the capacity of the environment to give support to the population.[1]

The term human overpopulation often refers to the relationship between the entire human population and its environment: the Earth,[2] or to smaller geographical areas such as countries. Overpopulation can result from an increase in births, a decline in mortality rates, an increase in immigration, or an unsustainable biome and depletion of resources. It is possible for very sparsely populated areas to be overpopulated if the area has a meagre or non-existent capability to sustain life (e.g. a desert). Advocates of population moderation cite issues like quality of life, carrying capacity and risk of starvation as a basis to argue against continuing high human population growth and for population decline. In either case, a consideration is that any population crash be nonviolent.


Human population has been growing continuously since the end of the Black Death, around the year 1350,[3] although the most significant increase has been in the last 50 years, mainly due to medical advancements and increase in agricultural productivity. The rate of population growth has been declining since the 1980s. The United Nations has expressed concern on continued excessive population growth in sub-Saharan Africa.[4] Recent research has demonstrated that those concerns are well grounded.[5] As of December 11, 2016 the world's human population is estimated to be 7.47 billion by the United States Census Bureau,[6] and over 7 billion by the United Nations.[7][8][9] Most contemporary estimates for the carrying capacity of the Earth under existing conditions are between 4 billion and 16 billion. Depending on which estimate is used, human overpopulation may or may not have already occurred. Nevertheless, the rapid recent increase in human population is causing some concern. The population is expected to reach between 8 and 10.5 billion between the years 2040[10][11] and 2050.[12] In May 2011, the United Nations increased the medium variant projections to 9.3 billion for 2050 and 10.1 billion for 2100.[13]

The recent rapid increase in human population over the past three centuries has raised concerns that the planet may not be able to sustain present or future numbers of inhabitants. The InterAcademy Panel Statement on Population Growth, circa 1994, stated that many environmental problems, such as rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, global warming, and pollution, are aggravated by the population expansion.[14] Other problems associated with overpopulation include the increased demand for resources such as fresh water and food, starvation and malnutrition, consumption of natural resources (such as fossil fuels) faster than the rate of regeneration, and a deterioration in living conditions. Wealthy but highly populated territories like Britain rely on food imports from overseas.[15] This was severely felt during the World Wars when, despite food efficiency initiatives like "dig for victory" and food rationing, Britain needed to fight to secure import routes. However, many believe that waste and over-consumption, especially by wealthy nations, is putting more strain on the environment than overpopulation.[16]

Most countries have no direct policy of limiting their birth rates, but the rates have still fallen due to education about family planning and increasing access to birth control and contraception. Only China has imposed legal restrictions on having more than one child. Extraterrestrial settlement and other technical solutions have been proposed as ways to mitigate overpopulation in the future.

History of concern

Thousands of scooters make their way through Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Concern about overpopulation is an ancient topic. Tertullian was a resident of the city of Carthage in the second century CE, when the population of the world was about 190 million (only 3-4% of what it is today). He notably said: "What most frequently meets our view (and occasions complaint) is our teeming population. Our numbers are burdensome to the world, which can hardly support us.... In very deed, pestilence, and famine, and wars, and earthquakes have to be regarded as a remedy for nations, as the means of pruning the luxuriance of the human race." Before that, Plato, Aristotle and others broached the topic as well.[17]

Throughout history, population growth has usually been slow despite high birth rates, due to war, plagues and other diseases, and high infant mortality. During the 750 years before the Industrial Revolution, the world's population increased very slowly, remaining under 250 million.[18]

By the beginning of the 19th century, the world population had grown to a billion individuals, and intellectuals such as Thomas Malthus predicted that mankind would outgrow its available resources, because a finite amount of land would be incapable of supporting a population with a limitless potential for increase.[19] Mercantillists argued that a large population was a form of wealth, which made it possible to create bigger markets and armies.

During the 19th century, Malthus's work was often interpreted in a way that blamed the poor alone for their condition and helping them was said to worsen conditions in the long run.[20] This resulted, for example, in the English poor laws of 1834[20] and in a hesitating response to the Irish Great Famine of 1845–52.[21]

The UN Population Assessment Report of 2004 projects that the world population will plateau by 2050 and will remain stable until 2300.[22] Adrian Raftery, a University of Washington professor of statistics and of sociology, challenges this projection: "The consensus over the past 20 years or so was that world population, which is currently around 7 billion, would go up to 9 billion and level off or probably decline. We found there’s a 70 percent probability the world population will not stabilize this century. Population, which had sort of fallen off the world’s agenda, remains a very important issue."[23] A more recent UN projection suggests the population could grow to as many as 15 billion by 2100.[24]

Human population

History of population growth

Main article: World population
Data from World Population.
Year Billion
1804 1
1927 2
1959 3
1974 4
1987 5
1999 6
2011 7
2020 7.7 (estimate)[25]

The human population has gone through a number of periods of growth since the dawn of civilization in the Holocene period, around 10,000 BCE. The beginning of civilization roughly coincides with the receding of glacial ice following the end of the last glacial period.[26] It is estimated that between 1-5 million people, subsisting on hunting and foraging, inhabited the Earth in the period before the Neolithic Revolution, when human activity shifted away from hunter-gathering and towards very primitive farming.[27]

Around 8000 BCE, at the dawn of agriculture, the population of the world was approximately 5 million.[28] The next several millennia saw a steady increase in the population, with very rapid growth beginning in 1000 BCE, and a peak of between 200 and 300 million people in 1 BCE.

The Plague of Justinian caused Europe's population to drop by around 50% between 541 and the 8th century.[29] Steady growth resumed in 800 CE.[30] However, growth was again disrupted by frequent plagues; most notably, the Black Death during the 14th century. The effects of the Black Death are thought to have reduced the world's population, then at an estimated 450 million, to between 350 and 375 million by 1400.[31] The population of Europe stood at over 70 million in 1340;[32] these levels did not return until 200 years later.[33] England's population reached an estimated 5.6 million in 1650, up from an estimated 2.6 million in 1500.[34] New crops from the Americas via the Spanish colonizers in the 16th century contributed to the population growth.[35]

In other parts of the globe, China's population at the founding of the Ming dynasty in 1368 stood close to 60 million, approaching 150 million by the end of the dynasty in 1644.[36][37] The population of the Americas in 1500 may have been between 50 and 100 million.[38]

Encounters between European explorers and populations in the rest of the world often introduced local epidemics of extraordinary virulence. Archaeological evidence indicates that the death of around 90% of the Native American population of the New World was caused by Old World diseases such as smallpox, measles, and influenza.[39] Europeans introduced diseases alien to the indigenous people, therefore they did not have immunity to these foreign diseases.[40]

After the start of the Industrial Revolution, during the 18th century, the rate of population growth began to increase. By the end of the century, the world's population was estimated at just under 1 billion.[41] At the turn of the 20th century, the world's population was roughly 1.6 billion.[41] By 1940, this figure had increased to 2.3 billion.[42]

Population growth 1990–2009 (%)[43]
World 28.4%
Africa 58.4%
Middle East 53.4%
Asia (except China) 36.9%
Latin America 32.0%
OECD North America 25.1%
China 17.3%
OECD Europe 9.9%
OECD Pacific 9.5%
Non-OECD Europe and Eurasia -2.7%

Dramatic growth beginning in 1950 (above 1.8% per year) coincided with greatly increased food production as a result of the industrialization of agriculture brought about by the Green Revolution.[44] The rate of human population growth peaked in 1964, at about 2.1% per year.[45] For example, Indonesia's population grew from 97 million in 1961 to 237.6 million in 2010,[46][47] a 145% increase in 49 years. In India, the population grew from 361.1 million people in 1951 to just over 1.2 billion by 2011,[48][49] a 235% increase in 60 years.

Continent 1900 population[50]
Africa 133 million
Asia 904 million
Europe 408 million
Latin America and Caribbean 74 million
North America 82 million

There is concern over the sharp population increase in many countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, that has occurred over the last several decades, and that it is creating problems with land management, natural resources and access to water supplies.[51]

The population of Chad has, for example, grown from 6,279,921 in 1993 to 10,329,208 in 2009.[52] Niger, Uganda, Nigeria, Tanzania, Ethiopia and the DRC are witnessing a similar growth in population. The situation is most acute in western, central and eastern Africa.[5] Refugees from places like Sudan have further strained the resources of neighboring states like Chad and Egypt. Chad is also host to roughly 255,000 refugees from Sudan's Darfur region, and about 77,000 refugees from the Central African Republic, while approximately 188,000 Chadians have been displaced by their own civil war and famines, have either fled to either the Sudan, the Niger or, more recently, Libya.[53]

Projections of population growth

Continent Projected 2050 population[54]
Africa 1.8 billion
Asia 5.3 billion
Europe 628 million
Latin America and Caribbean 809 million
North America 392 million

According to projections, the world population will continue to grow until at least 2050, with the population reaching 9 billion in 2040,[55][56] and some predictions putting the population as high as 11 billion in 2050.[57] By 2100, the population could reach 15 billion.[24] Walter Greiling projected in the 1950s that world population would reach a peak of about nine billion, in the 21st century, and then stop growing, after a readjustment of the Third World and a sanitation of the tropics.[58]

According to the United Nations' World Population Prospects report:[59]

Urban growth

Urban areas with at least one million inhabitants in 2006. 3% of the world's population lived in cities in 1800, rising to 47% at the end of the twentieth century.

In 1800 only 3% of the world's population lived in cities. By the 20th century's close, 47% did so. In 1950 there were 83 cities with populations exceeding one million; but by 2007 this had risen to 468 agglomerations of more than one million.[63] If the trend continues, the world's urban population will double every 38 years, according to researchers. The UN forecasts that today's urban population of 3.2 billion will rise to nearly 5 billion by 2030, when three out of five people will live in cities.[64]

The increase will be most dramatic in the poorest and least-urbanised continents, Asia and Africa. Projections indicate that most urban growth over the next 25 years will be in developing countries.[65] One billion people, one-seventh of the world's population, or one-third of urban population, now live in shanty towns,[66] which are seen as "breeding grounds" for social problems such as crime, drug addiction , alcoholism, poverty and unemployment. In many poor countries, slums exhibit high rates of disease due to unsanitary conditions, malnutrition, and lack of basic health care.[67]

In 2000, there were 18 megacities  conurbations such as Tokyo, Beijing, Guangzhou, Seoul, Karachi, Mexico City, Mumbai, São Paulo, London and New York City  that have populations in excess of 10 million inhabitants. Greater Tokyo already has 35 million, more than the entire population of Canada (at 34.1 million).[68]

According to the Far Eastern Economic Review, Asia alone will have at least 10 'hypercities' by 2025, that is, cities inhabited by more than 19 million people, including Jakarta (24.9 million people), Dhaka (25 million), Karachi (26.5 million), Shanghai (27 million) and Mumbai (33 million).[69] Lagos has grown from 300,000 in 1950 to an estimated 15 million today, and the Nigerian government estimates that city will have expanded to 25 million residents by 2015.[70] Chinese experts forecast that Chinese cities will contain 800 million people by 2020.[71]


Street in Kathmandu

From a historical perspective, technological revolutions have coincided with population explosions. There have been three major technological revolutions – the tool-making revolution, the agricultural revolution, and the industrial revolution – all of which allowed humans more access to food, resulting in subsequent population explosions.[72][73] For example, the use of tools, such as bow and arrow, allowed primitive hunters greater access to high energy foods (e.g. animal meat). Similarly, the transition to farming about 10,000 years ago greatly increased the overall food supply, which was used to support more people. Food production further increased with the industrial revolution as machinery, fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides were used to increase land under cultivation as well as crop yields.[74] In short, similar to bacteria that multiply in response to increased food supply, humans have increased their population as soon as food became more abundant as a result of technological innovations.

Significant increases in human population occur whenever the birth rate exceeds the death rate for extended periods of time. Traditionally, the fertility rate is strongly influenced by cultural and social norms that are rather stable and therefore slow to adapt to changes in the social, technological, or environmental conditions. For example, when death rates fell during the 19th and 20th century – as a result of improved sanitation, child immunizations, and other advances in medicine – allowing more newborns to survive, the fertility rate did not adjust downward fast enough, resulting in significant population growth. Prior to these changes, seven out of ten children died before reaching reproductive age, while today about 95% of newborns in industrialized nations reach adulthood.[75]


Agriculture has been the main factor behind human population growth. This dates back to prehistoric times, when agricultural methods were first developed, and continues to the present day, with fertilizers, agrochemicals, large-scale mechanization, genetic manipulation, and other technologies.[76]

Psychological factors

Human psychology and the cycle of entrenched poverty, as well as the rest of the world's reaction to it, are also causative factors. Areas with greater burden of disease and warfare, contrary to popular belief, do not experience less population growth over the long term, but far more over a sustained period as poverty becomes further entrenched

. This is because parents and siblings who have experienced calamitous conditions suffer from a kind of post traumatic stress syndrome about losing their family members and overcompensate by having "extra" babies. These extra babies and calamities fuel a vicious cycle, and only in the small minority of cases does it cease

. As this cycle is compounded over generations, calamities such as disaster or war take on a multiplier effect. For example, the AIDS crisis in Africa is said to have killed 30 million to date, yet during the last two decades money and initiatives to lower population growth by contraception have been sidelined in favor of combating HIV,[77] feeding the population explosion that we see in Africa today. In 1990, this continent's population was roughly 600 million; today it is over 1,050 million, 150 million more than if the HIV/AIDS crisis had never occurred.[78]


Population growth rates between 1950 and 2012 range from a 0.5% increase in the case of Bulgaria to a more than 100 fold increase for the United Arab Emirates (from 79,050 to 8.5 million).[79] Roughly half of all nations have quadrupled their populations since 1950.[79]

Demographic transition

The theory of demographic transition held that, after the standard of living and life expectancy increase, family sizes and birth rates decline. However, as new data has become available, it has been observed that after a certain level of development (HDI equal to 0.86 or higher) the fertility increases again.[80] This means that both the worry that the theory generated about aging populations and the complacency it bred regarding the future environmental impact of population growth are misguided.

Factors cited in the old theory included such social factors as later ages of marriage, the growing desire of many women in such settings to seek careers outside child rearing and domestic work, and the decreased need of children in industrialized settings. The latter factor stems from the fact that children perform a great deal of work in small-scale agricultural societies, and work less in industrial ones; it has been cited to explain the decline in birth rates in industrializing regions.

Many countries have high population growth rates but lower total fertility rates because high population growth in the past skewed the age demographic toward a young age, so the population still rises as the more numerous younger generation approaches maturity.

"Demographic entrapment" is a concept developed by Maurice King, Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Leeds, who posits that this phenomenon occurs when a country has a population larger than its carrying capacity, no possibility of migration, and exports too little to be able to import food. This will cause starvation. He claims that for example many sub-Saharan nations are or will become stuck in demographic entrapment, instead of having a demographic transition.[81]

For the world as a whole, the number of children born per woman decreased from 5.02 to 2.65 between 1950 and 2005. A breakdown by region is as follows:

Excluding the observed reversal in fertility decrease for high development, the projected world number of children born per woman for 2050 would be around 2.05. Only the Middle East & North Africa (2.09) and Sub-Saharan Africa (2.61) would then have numbers greater than 2.05.[82]

Carrying capacity

Main article: Carrying capacity
A family planning placard in Ethiopia. It shows some negative effects of having too many children.

Some groups (for example, the World Wide Fund for Nature[83][84] and Global Footprint Network) have stated that the carrying capacity for the human population has been exceeded as measured using the Ecological Footprint. In 2006, WWF's "Living Planet Report" stated that in order for all humans to live with the current consumption patterns of Europeans, we would be spending three times more than what the planet can renew.[85] Humanity as a whole was using, by 2006, 40 percent more than what Earth can regenerate.[86] However, Roger Martin of Population Matters states the view: "the poor want to get rich, and I want them to get rich," with a later addition, "of course we have to change consumption habits,... but we've also got to stabilise our numbers".[87] Another study by the World Wildlife Fund in 2014 also found that the global human population exceeds the planet's biocapacity, and that it would take the equivalent of 1.5 Earths of biocapacity to meet our current demands.[88]

But critics question the simplifications and statistical methods used in calculating Ecological Footprints. Therefore, Global Footprint Network and its partner organizations have engaged with national governments and international agencies to test the results – reviews have been produced by France, Germany, the European Commission, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Japan and the United Arab Emirates.[89] Some point out that a more refined method of assessing Ecological Footprint is to designate sustainable versus non-sustainable categories of consumption.[90][91] However, if yield estimates were adjusted for sustainable levels of production, the yield figures would be lower, and hence the overshoot estimated by the Ecological Footprint method even higher.

Other studies give particular attention to resource depletion and increased world affluence. [92][93]

In a 1994 study titled Food, Land, Population and the U.S. Economy, David Pimentel and Mario Giampietro estimated the maximum U.S. population for a sustainable economy at 200 million.[94] And in order to achieve a sustainable economy and avert disaster, the United States would have to reduce its population by at least one-third, and world population would have to be reduced by two-thirds.[95]

Many quantitative studies have estimated the world's carrying capacity for humans, that is, a limit to the world population.[96] A meta-analysis of 69 such studies suggests a point estimate of the limit to be 7.7 billion people, while lower and upper meta-bounds for current technology are estimated as 0.65 and 98 billion people, respectively. They conclude: "recent predictions of stabilized world population levels for 2050 exceed several of our meta-estimates of a world population limit".[97]

Effects of human overpopulation

Humanity's overall impact on the planet is affected by many factors besides raw population. The lifestyle (including overall affluence and resource utilization) and the pollution (including carbon footprint) are equally important. In 2008, the New York Times stated that the inhabitants of the developed nations of the world consume resources like oil and metals at a rate almost 32 times greater than those of the developing world, who make up the majority of the human population.[98]

Some problems associated with or exacerbated by human overpopulation and over-consumption are:

Many of these problems are explored in the dystopic science fiction film Soylent Green, where an overpopulated Earth suffers from food shortages, depleted resources and poverty and in the documentary "Aftermath: Population Overload".

Some economists, such as Thomas Sowell[132] and Walter E. Williams[122] argue that third world poverty and famine are caused in part by bad government and bad economic policies. Most biologists and sociologists see overpopulation as a serious threat to the quality of human life.[104][133] Some deep ecologists, such as the radical thinker and polemicist Pentti Linkola, see human overpopulation as a threat to the entire biosphere.[134]


Overpopulation does not depend only on the size or density of the population, but on the ratio of population to available sustainable resources. It also depends on how resources are managed and distributed throughout the population.

The resources to be considered when evaluating whether an ecological niche is overpopulated include clean water, clean air, food, shelter, warmth, and other resources necessary to sustain life. If the quality of human life is addressed, there may be additional resources considered, such as medical care, education, proper sewage treatment, waste disposal and energy supplies. Overpopulation places competitive stress on the basic life sustaining resources,[135] leading to a diminished quality of life.[133]

Directly related to maintaining the health of the human population is water supply, and it is one of the resources that experience the biggest strain. With the global population at about 7.5 billion, and each human theoretically needing 2 liters of drinking water, there is a demand for 15 billion liters of water each day to meet the minimum requirement for healthy living (United). Weather patterns, elevation, and climate all contribute to uneven distribution of fresh drinking water. Without clean water, good health is not a viable option. Besides drinking, water is used to create sanitary living conditions and is the basis of creating a healthy environment fit to hold human life. In addition to drinking water, water is also used for bathing, washing clothes and dishes, flushing toilets, a variety of cleaning methods, recreation, watering lawns, and farm irrigation. Irrigation poses one of the largest problems, because without sufficient water to irrigate crops, the crops die and then there is the problem of food rations and starvation. In addition to water needed for crops and food, there is limited land area dedicated to food production, and not much more that is suitable to be added. Arable land, needed to sustain the growing population, is also a factor because land being under or over cultivated easily upsets the delicate balance of nutrition supply. There are also problems with location of arable land with regard to proximity to countries and relative population (Bashford 240). Access to nutrition is an important limiting factor in population sustainability and growth. No increase in arable land added to the still increasing human population will eventually pose a serious conflict. Only 38% of the land area of the globe is dedicated to agriculture, and there is not room for much more. Although plants produce 54 billion metric tons of carbohydrates per year, when the population is expected to grow to 9 billion by 2050, the plants may not be able to keep up (Biello). Food supply is a primary example of how a resource reacts when its carrying capacity is exceeded. By trying to grow more and more crops off of the same amount of land, the soil becomes exhausted. Because the soil is exhausted, it is then unable to produce the same amount of food as before, and is overall less productive. Therefore, by using resources beyond a sustainable level, the resource become nullified and ineffective, which further increases the disparity between the demand for a resource and the availability of a resource. There must be a shift to provide adequate recovery time to each one of the supplies in demand to support contemporary human lifestyles. [136][137][138]

An industrial area, with a power plant, south of Yangzhou's downtown, China

David Pimentel has stated that "With the imbalance growing between population numbers and vital life sustaining resources, humans must actively conserve cropland, freshwater, energy, and biological resources. There is a need to develop renewable energy resources. Humans everywhere must understand that rapid population growth damages the Earth's resources and diminishes human well-being."[139][140]

These reflect the comments also of the United States Geological Survey in their paper The Future of Planet Earth: Scientific Challenges in the Coming Century. "As the global population continues to grow...people will place greater and greater demands on the resources of our planet, including mineral and energy resources, open space, water, and plant and animal resources." "Earth's natural wealth: an audit" by New Scientist magazine states that many of the minerals that we use for a variety of products are in danger of running out in the near future.[141] A handful of geologists around the world have calculated the costs of new technologies in terms of the materials they use and the implications of their spreading to the developing world. All agree that the planet's booming population and rising standards of living are set to put unprecedented demands on the materials that only Earth itself can provide.[141] Limitations on how much of these materials is available could even mean that some technologies are not worth pursuing long term.... "Virgin stocks of several metals appear inadequate to sustain the modern 'developed world' quality of life for all of Earth's people under contemporary technology".[142]

On the other hand, some cornucopian researchers, such as Julian L. Simon and Bjørn Lomborg believe that resources exist for further population growth. In a 2010 study, they concluded that "there are not (and will never be) too many people for the planet to feed" according to The Independent.[143] Some critics warn, this will be at a high cost to the Earth: "the technological optimists are probably correct in claiming that overall world food production can be increased substantially over the next few decades...[however] the environmental cost of what Paul R. and Anne H. Ehrlich describe as 'turning the Earth into a giant human feedlot' could be severe. A large expansion of agriculture to provide growing populations with improved diets is likely to lead to further deforestation, loss of species, soil erosion, and pollution from pesticides and fertilizer runoff as farming intensifies and new land is brought into production."[144] Since we are intimately dependent upon the living systems of the Earth,[145][146][147] some scientists have questioned the wisdom of further expansion.

According to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, a four-year research effort by 1,360 of the world's prominent scientists commissioned to measure the actual value of natural resources to humans and the world, "The structure of the world's ecosystems changed more rapidly in the second half of the twentieth century than at any time in recorded human history, and virtually all of Earth's ecosystems have now been significantly transformed through human actions."[148] "Ecosystem services, particularly food production, timber and fisheries, are important for employment and economic activity. Intensive use of ecosystems often produces the greatest short-term advantage, but excessive and unsustainable use can lead to losses in the long term. A country could cut its forests and deplete its fisheries, and this would show only as a positive gain to GDP, despite the loss of capital assets. If the full economic value of ecosystems were taken into account in decision-making, their degradation could be significantly slowed down or even reversed."[149][150]

Another study by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) called the Global Environment Outlook[151] which involved 1,400 scientists and took five years to prepare comes to similar conclusions. It "found that human consumption had far outstripped available resources. Each person on Earth now requires a third more land to supply his or her needs than the planet can supply." It faults a failure to "respond to or recognize the magnitude of the challenges facing the people and the environment of the planet... 'The systematic destruction of the Earth's natural and nature-based resources has reached a point where the economic viability of economies is being challenged – and where the bill we hand to our children may prove impossible to pay'... The report's authors say its objective is 'not to present a dark and gloomy scenario, but an urgent call to action'. It warns that tackling the problems may affect the vested interests of powerful groups, and that the environment must be moved to the core of decision-making... '[152]

Although all resources, whether mineral or other, are limited on the planet, there is a degree of self-correction whenever a scarcity or high-demand for a particular kind is experienced. For example, in 1990 known reserves of many natural resources were higher, and their prices lower, than in 1970, despite higher demand and higher consumption. Whenever a price spike would occur, the market tended to correct itself whether by substituting an equivalent resource or switching to a new technology.[153]

Fresh water

Further information: Water crisis

Fresh water supplies, on which agriculture depends, are running low worldwide.[154][155] This water crisis is only expected to worsen as the population increases.[156]

Potential problems with dependence on desalination are reviewed below, however, the majority of the world's freshwater supply is contained in the polar icecaps, and underground river systems accessible through springs and wells.

Fresh water can be obtained from salt water by desalination. For example, Malta derives two thirds of its freshwater by desalination. A number of nuclear powered desalination plants exist;[157][158] However, the high costs of desalination, especially for poor countries, make impractical the transport of large amounts of desalinated seawater to interiors of large countries.[159] The cost of desalination varies; Israel is now desalinating water for a cost of 53 cents per cubic meter,[160] Singapore at 49 cents per cubic meter.[161] In the United States, the cost is 81 cents per cubic meter ($3.06 for 1,000 gallons).[162]

According to a 2004 study by Zhou and Tol, "one needs to lift the water by 2000 m, or transport it over more than 1600 km to get transport costs equal to the desalination costs. Desalinated water is expensive in places that are both somewhat far from the sea and somewhat high, such as Riyadh and Harare. In other places, the dominant cost is desalination, not transport. This leads to somewhat lower costs in places like Beijing, Bangkok, Zaragoza, Phoenix, and, of course, coastal cities like Tripoli." Thus while the study is generally positive about the technology for affluent areas that are proximate to oceans, it concludes that "Desalinated water may be a solution for some water-stress regions, but not for places that are poor, deep in the interior of a continent, or at high elevation. Unfortunately, that includes some of the places with biggest water problems."[163] Another potential problem with desalination is the byproduction of saline brine, which can be a major cause of marine pollution when dumped back into the oceans at high temperatures."[163]

The world's largest desalination plant is the Jebel Ali Desalination Plant (Phase 2) in the United Arab Emirates, which can produce 300 million cubic metres of water per year,[164] or about 2500 gallons per second. The largest desalination plant in the US is the one at Tampa Bay, Florida, which began desalinating 25 million gallons (95000 m³) of water per day in December 2007. A 17 January 2008, article in the Wall Street Journal states, "Worldwide, 13,080 desalination plants produce more than 12 billion gallons of water a day, according to the International Desalination Association."[165] After being desalinated at Jubail, Saudi Arabia, water is pumped 200 miles (320 km) inland though a pipeline to the capital city of Riyadh.[166]

However, new data originating from the GRACE experiments and isotopic testing done by the IAEA show that the Nubian aquifer—which is under the largest, driest part of the earth's surface, has enough water in it to provide for "at least several centuries". In addition to this, new and highly detailed maps of the earth's underground reservoirs will be soon created from these technologies that will further allow proper budgeting of cheap water.[167]


Some scientists argue that there is enough food to support the world population,[168][169] and some dispute this, particularly if sustainability is taken into account.[170]

Many countries rely heavily on imports. Egypt and Iran rely on imports for 40% of their grain supply. Yemen and Israel import more than 90%. And just 6 countries – Argentina, Australia, Canada, France, Thailand and the USA – supply 90% of grain exports. In recent decades the US alone supplied almost half of world grain exports.[171][172]

A 2001 United Nations report says population growth is "the main force driving increases in agricultural demand" but "most recent expert assessments are cautiously optimistic about the ability of global food production to keep up with demand for the foreseeable future (that is to say, until approximately 2030 or 2050)", assuming declining population growth rates.[173]

However, the observed figures for 2007 show an actual increase in absolute numbers of undernourished people in the world, 923 million in 2007 versus 832 million in 1995.;[174] the more recent FAO estimates point to an even more dramatic increase, to 1.02 billion in 2009.[175]

Global perspective

Growth in food production has been greater than population growth.

The amounts of natural resources in this context are not necessarily fixed, and their distribution is not necessarily a zero-sum game. For example, due to the Green Revolution and the fact that more and more land is appropriated each year from wild lands for agricultural purposes, the worldwide production of food had steadily increased up until 1995. World food production per person was considerably higher in 2005 than 1961.

As world population doubled from 3 billion to 6 billion, daily calorie consumption in poor countries increased from 1,932 to 2,650, and the percentage of people in those countries who were malnourished fell from 45% to 18%. This suggests that Third World poverty and famine are caused by underdevelopment, not overpopulation.[176] However, others question these statistics.[177] From 1950 to 1984, as the Green Revolution transformed agriculture around the world, grain production increased by over 250%.[178] The world population has grown by about four billion since the beginning of the Green Revolution and most believe that, without the Revolution, there would be greater famine and malnutrition than the UN presently documents.[44][179]

The number of people who are overweight has surpassed the number who are undernourished. In a 2006 news story, MSNBC reported, "There are an estimated 800 million undernourished people and more than a billion considered overweight worldwide." The U.S. has one of the highest rates of obesity in the world.[180] However, studies show that wealthy and educated people are far likelier to eat healthy food,[181] indicating obesity is a disease related to poverty and lack of education and excessive advertising of unhealthy eatables at cheaper cost, high in calories, with little nutritive value are consumed.[182][183]

Percentage of population suffering from malnutrition by country, according to United Nations statistics.

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations states in its report The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006, that while the number of undernourished people in the developing countries has declined by about three million, a smaller proportion of the populations of developing countries is undernourished today than in 1990–92: 17% against 20%. Furthermore, FAO's projections suggest that the proportion of hungry people in developing countries could be halved from 1990–92 levels to 10% by 2015. The FAO also states "We have emphasized first and foremost that reducing hunger is no longer a question of means in the hands of the global community. The world is richer today than it was ten years ago. There is more food available and still more could be produced without excessive upward pressure on prices. The knowledge and resources to reduce hunger are there. What is lacking is sufficient political will to mobilize those resources to the benefit of the hungry."[184]

As of 2008, the price of grain has increased due to more farming used in biofuels,[185] world oil prices at over $100 a barrel,[186] global population growth,[187] climate change,[188] loss of agricultural land to residential and industrial development,[189][190] and growing consumer demand in China and India[191][192] Food riots have recently taken place in many countries across the world.[193][194][195] An epidemic of stem rust on wheat caused by race Ug99 is currently spreading across Africa and into Asia and is causing major concern. A virulent wheat disease could destroy most of the world's main wheat crops, leaving millions to starve. The fungus has spread from Africa to Iran, and may already be in Afghanistan and Pakistan.[196][197][198]

Food security will become more difficult to achieve as resources run out. Resources in danger of becoming depleted include oil, phosphorus, grain, fish, and water.[199][200] The British scientist John Beddington predicted in 2009 that supplies of energy, food, and water will need to be increased by 50% to reach demand levels of 2030.[201][202] According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), food supplies will need to be increased by 70% by 2050 to meet projected demands.[203]


In Africa, if current trends of soil degradation and population growth continue, the continent might be able to feed just 25% of its population by 2025, according to UNU's Ghana-based Institute for Natural Resources in Africa.[204]

Hunger and malnutrition kill nearly 6 million children a year, and more people are malnourished in sub-Saharan Africa this decade than in the 1990s, according to a report released by the Food and Agriculture Organization. In sub-Saharan Africa, the number of malnourished people grew to 203.5 million people in 2000–02 from 170.4 million 10 years earlier says The State of Food Insecurity in the World report. In 2001, 46.4% of people in sub-Saharan Africa were living in extreme poverty.[205]

Dhaka street crowds. Bangladesh.


According to a 2004 article from the BBC, China, the world's most populous country, suffers from an "obesity surge". The article stated that, "Altogether, around 200 million people are thought to be overweight, 22.8% of the population, and 60 million (7.1%) obese".[206] More recent data indicate China's grain production peaked in the mid-1990s, due to increased extraction of groundwater in the North China plain.[207]

Other countries

Japan may face a food crisis that could reduce daily diets to the austere meals of the 1950s, believes a senior government adviser.[208]

Population as a function of food availability

Thinkers from a wide range of academic fields and political backgrounds—including agricultural scientist David Pimentel,[209] behavioral scientist Russell Hopfenberg,[210] right-wing anthropologist Virginia Abernethy,[211] ecologist Garrett Hardin,[212] ecologist and anthropologist Peter Farb, journalist Richard Manning,[213] environmental biologist Alan D. Thornhill,[214] cultural critic and writer Daniel Quinn,[215] and anarcho-primitivist John Zerzan,[216]—propose that, like all other animal populations, human populations predictably grow and shrink according to their available food supply, growing during an abundance of food and shrinking in times of scarcity.

Proponents of this theory argue that every time food production is increased, the population grows. Most human populations throughout history validate this theory, as does the overall current global population. Populations of hunter-gatherers fluctuate in accordance with the amount of available food. The world human population began increasing after the Neolithic Revolution and its increased food supply. This was, subsequent to the Green Revolution, followed by even more severely accelerated population growth, which continues today. Often, wealthier countries send their surplus food resources to the aid of starving communities; however, proponents of this theory argue that this seemingly beneficial notion only results in further harm to those communities in the long run. Peter Farb, for example, has commented on the paradox that "intensification of production to feed an increased population leads to a still greater increase in population."[217] Daniel Quinn has also focused on this phenomenon, which he calls the "Food Race" (comparable, in terms of both escalation and potential catastrophe, to the nuclear arms race).

Critics of this theory point out that, in the modern era, birth rates are lowest in the developed nations, which also have the highest access to food. In fact, some developed countries have both a diminishing population and an abundant food supply. The United Nations projects that the population of 51 countries or areas, including Germany, Italy, Japan, and most of the states of the former Soviet Union, is expected to be lower in 2050 than in 2005. This shows that, limited to the scope of the population living within a single given political boundary, particular human populations do not always grow to match the available food supply. However, the global population as a whole still grows in accordance with the total food supply and many of these wealthier countries are major exporters of food to poorer populations, so that, "it is through exports from food-rich to food-poor areas (Allaby, 1984; Pimentel et al., 1999) that the population growth in these food-poor areas is further fueled."[209]

Regardless of criticisms against the theory that population is a function of food availability, the human population is, on the global scale, undeniably increasing,[218] as is the net quantity of human food produced — a pattern that has been true for roughly 10,000 years, since the human development of agriculture. The fact that some affluent countries demonstrate negative population growth fails to discredit the theory as whole, since the world has become a globalized system with food moving across national borders from areas of abundance to areas of scarcity. Hopfenberg and Pimentel's findings support both this[209] and Quinn's direct accusation that "First World farmers are fueling the Third World population explosion."[219] Additionally, the hypothesis is not so simplistic as to be rejected by any single case study, as in Germany's recent population trends; clearly other factors are at work to limit the population in wealthier areas: contraceptive access, educational programs, cultural norms and, most influentially, differing economic realities from nation to nation.

As a result of water deficits

Water deficits, which are already spurring heavy grain imports in numerous smaller countries, may soon do the same in larger countries, such as China or India, if technology is not used.[220] The water tables are falling in scores of countries (including Northern China, the US, and India) owing to widespread overdrafting beyond sustainable yields. Other countries affected include Pakistan, Iran, and Mexico. This overdrafting is already leading to water scarcity and cutbacks in grain harvest. Even with the overpumping of its aquifers, China has developed a grain deficit. This effect has contributed in driving grain prices upward. Most of the 3 billion people projected to be added worldwide by mid-century will be born in countries already experiencing water shortages. One suggested solution is for population growth to be slowed quickly by investing heavily in female literacy and family planning services.[221] Desalination is also considered a viable and effective solution to the problem of water shortages.[160][161]

After China and India, there is a second tier of smaller countries with large water deficits – Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Mexico, and Pakistan. Four of these already import a large share of their grain. Only Pakistan remains self-sufficient. But with a population expanding by 4 million a year, it will also soon turn to the world market for grain.[172]


Percentages of the Earth's surface covered by water, dedicated to agriculture, under conversion, intact, and used for human habitation. While humans ourselves occupy only 0.05% of the Earth's total area, our effects are felt on over one-quarter of the land.

The World Resources Institute states that "Agricultural conversion to croplands and managed pastures has affected some 3.3 billion [hectares] – roughly 26 percent of the land area. All totaled, agriculture has displaced one-third of temperate and tropical forests and one-quarter of natural grasslands."[222][223] Forty percent of the land area is under conversion and fragmented; less than one quarter, primarily in the Arctic and the deserts, remains intact.[224] Usable land may become less useful through salinization, deforestation, desertification, erosion, and urban sprawl. Global warming may cause flooding of many of the most productive agricultural areas.[225] The development of energy sources may also require large areas, for example, the building of hydroelectric dams. Thus, available useful land may become a limiting factor. By most estimates, at least half of cultivable land is already being farmed, and there are concerns that the remaining reserves are greatly overestimated.[226]

High crop yield vegetables like potatoes and lettuce use less space on inedible plant parts, like stalks, husks, vines, and inedible leaves. New varieties of selectively bred and hybrid plants have larger edible parts (fruit, vegetable, grain) and smaller inedible parts; however, many of these gain of agricultural technology are now historic, and new advances are more difficult to achieve. With new technologies, it is possible to grow crops on some marginal land under certain conditions. Aquaculture could theoretically increase available area. Hydroponics and food from bacteria and fungi, like quorn, may allow the growing of food without having to consider land quality, climate, or even available sunlight, although such a process may be very energy-intensive. Some argue that not all arable land will remain productive if used for agriculture because some marginal land can only be made to produce food by unsustainable practices like slash-and-burn agriculture. Even with the modern techniques of agriculture, the sustainability of production is in question.

Some countries, such as the United Arab Emirates and particularly the Emirate of Dubai have constructed large artificial islands, or have created large dam and dike systems, like the Netherlands, which reclaim land from the sea to increase their total land area.[227] Some scientists have said that in the future, densely populated cities will use vertical farming to grow food inside skyscrapers.[228] The notion that space is limited has been decried by skeptics, who point out that the Earth's population of roughly 6.8 billion people could comfortably be housed an area comparable in size to the state of Texas, in the United States (about 269,000 square miles or 696,706.80 square kilometres).[229] However, the impact of humanity extends over a far greater area than that required simply for housing.

Fossil fuels

See also: Peak oil
M. King Hubbert's prediction of world petroleum production rates. Modern agriculture is totally reliant on petroleum energy.

Population optimists have been criticized for failing to take into account the depletion of the petroleum required for the production of fertilizers and fuel for transportation, as well as other fossil fuels.[230] In his 1992 book Earth in the Balance, Al Gore wrote, "... it ought to be possible to establish a coordinated global program to accomplish the strategic goal of completely eliminating the internal combustion engine over, say, a twenty-five-year period..."[231] Approximately half of the oil produced in the United States is refined into gasoline for use in internal combustion engines.[232]

The report Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, and Risk Management, commonly referred to as the Hirsch report, was created by request for the US Department of Energy and published in February 2005.[233] Some information was updated in 2007.[234] It examined the time frame for the occurrence of peak oil, the necessary mitigating actions, and the likely impacts based on the timeliness of those actions. It concludes that world oil peaking is going to happen, and will likely be abrupt. Initiating a mitigation crash program 20 years before peaking appears to offer the possibility of avoiding a world liquid fuels shortfall for the forecast period.

Optimists counter that fossil fuels will be sufficient until the development and implementation of suitable replacement technologies—such as nuclear power or various sources of renewable energy—occurs.[235] Methods of manufacturing fertilizers from garbage, sewage, and agricultural waste by using thermal depolymerization have been discovered.[236][237]

Wealth and poverty

As the world's population has grown, the percentage of the world's population living on less than $1 per day (adjusted for inflation) has halved in 20 years. The graph shows the 1981–2001 period.

The United Nations indicates that about 850 million people are malnourished or starving,[121] and 1.1 billion people do not have access to safe drinking water.[99] Some argue that Earth may support 6 billion people, but only if many live in misery. The proportion of the world's population living on less than $1 per day has halved in 20 years, but these are inflation-unadjusted numbers and likely misleading.[238] Since 1980, the global economy has grown by 380 percent, but the number of people living on less than $5 a day increased by more than 1.1 billion.[239]

The UN Human Development Report of 1997 states: "During the last 15–20 years, more than 100 developing countries, and several Eastern European countries, have suffered from disastrous growth failures. The reductions in standard of living have been deeper and more long-lasting than what was seen in the industrialised countries during the depression in the 1930s. As a result, the income for more than one billion people has fallen below the level that was reached 10, 20 or 30 years ago". Similarly, although the proportion of "starving" people in sub-Saharan Africa has decreased, the absolute number of starving people has increased due to population growth. The percentage dropped from 38% in 1970 to 33% in 1996 and was expected to be 30% by 2010.[177] But the region's population roughly doubled between 1970 and 1996. To keep the numbers of starving constant, the percentage would have dropped by more than half.[149][240]

As of 2004, there were 108 countries in the world with more than five million people. All of these in which women have, on the average, more than 4 children in their lifetime, have a per capita GDP of less than $5000. Only in two countries with per capita GDP above ~$15,000 do women have, on the average, more than 2 children in their lifetime: these are Israel and Saudi Arabia, with average lifetime births per woman between 2 and 4.

As their income increases, women are liberated and tend to have fewer "quantity kids", as in two in place of six.[243]

The correlation does not imply cause and effect, and can be linked to the interplay of birth rates, death rates and economic development.

Poor living conditions can also cause a very bad effect on the population; diseases such as malaria and HIV/AIDS can also contribute to this. Lack of nutrients, poor sanitation and poor health institutions. Death rate and birth rate can also have a negative effect on the population.


You know, when we first set up WWF, our objective was to save endangered species from extinction. But we have failed completely; we haven’t managed to save a single one. If only we had put all that money into condoms, we might have done some good. Sir Peter Scott, Founder of the World Wide Fund for Nature.[244]

Overpopulation has substantially adversely impacted the environment of Earth starting at least as early as the 20th century.[133] According to the Global Footprint Network, "today humanity uses the equivalent of 1.5 planets to provide the resources we use and absorb our waste".[245] There are also economic consequences of this environmental degradation in the form of ecosystem services attrition.[246] Beyond the scientifically verifiable harm to the environment, some assert the moral right of other species to simply exist rather than become extinct. Environmental author Jeremy Rifkin has said that "our burgeoning population and urban way of life have been purchased at the expense of vast ecosystems and habitats. ... It's no accident that as we celebrate the urbanization of the world, we are quickly approaching another historic watershed: the disappearance of the wild."[247]

Says Peter Raven, former President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in their seminal work AAAS Atlas of Population & Environment, "Where do we stand in our efforts to achieve a sustainable world? Clearly, the past half century has been a traumatic one, as the collective impact of human numbers, affluence (consumption per individual) and our choices of technology continue to exploit rapidly an increasing proportion of the world's resources at an unsustainable rate. ... During a remarkably short period of time, we have lost a quarter of the world's topsoil and a fifth of its agricultural land, altered the composition of the atmosphere profoundly, and destroyed a major proportion of our forests and other natural habitats without replacing them. Worst of all, we have driven the rate of biological extinction, the permanent loss of species, up several hundred times beyond its historical levels, and are threatened with the loss of a majority of all species by the end of the 21st century."

Traffic congestion in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Further, even in countries which have both large population growth and major ecological problems, it is not necessarily true that curbing the population growth will make a major contribution towards resolving all environmental problems.[248] However, as developing countries with high populations become more industrialized, pollution and consumption will invariably increase.

The Worldwatch Institute said in 2006 that the booming economies of China and India are "planetary powers that are shaping the global biosphere". The report states:

The world's ecological capacity is simply insufficient to satisfy the ambitions of China, India, Japan, Europe and the United States as well as the aspirations of the rest of the world in a sustainable way.[249]

It is said that if China and India were to consume as much resources per capita as the United States, in 2030 they would each require a full planet Earth to meet their needs.[250] In the long term these effects can lead to increased conflict over dwindling resources[251] and in the worst case a Malthusian catastrophe.

Many studies link population growth with emissions and the effect of climate change.[252][253]

Warfare and conflict

excessive growth may reduce output per worker, repress levels of living for the masses and engender strife. Confucius (551 – 479 BC)[254]
Overpopulation in various countries has become a serious threat to the health of people and a grave obstacle to any attempt to organize peace on this planet. Albert Einstein – physicist 1879 – 1955[255]

It has been suggested[256] that overpopulation leads to increased levels of tensions both between and within countries. Modern usage of the term "lebensraum" supports the idea that overpopulation may promote warfare through fear of resource scarcity and increasing numbers of youth lacking the opportunity to engage in peaceful employment (the youth bulge theory).

Criticism of this hypothesis

The hypothesis that population pressure causes increased warfare has been recently criticized on the empirical grounds. Both studies focusing on specific historical societies and analyses of cross-cultural data have failed to find positive correlation between population density and incidence of warfare. Andrey Korotayev, in collaboration with Peter Turchin, has shown that such negative results do not falsify the population-warfare hypothesis.[257]

Population and warfare are dynamical variables, and if their interaction causes sustained oscillations, then we do not in general expect to find strong correlation between the two variables measured at the same time (that is, unlagged). Korotayev and Turchin have explored mathematically what the dynamical patterns of interaction between population and warfare (focusing on internal warfare) might be in both stateless and state societies. Next, they have tested the model predictions in several empirical case studies: early modern England, Han and Tang China, and the Roman Empire. Their empirical results have supported the population-warfare theory: that there is a tendency for population numbers and internal warfare intensity to oscillate with the same period but shifted in phase (with warfare peaks following population peaks).

Furthermore, they have demonstrated that in the agrarian societies the rates of change of the two variables behave precisely as predicted by the theory: population rate of change is negatively affected by warfare intensity, while warfare rate of change is positively affected by population density.[257][258][259]

Mitigation measures

There are several mitigation measures that have been or can be applied to reduce overpopulation. All of these mitigations are ways to implement social norms. Overpopulation is an issue that threatens the state of the environment in the above-mentioned ways and therefore societies must make a change in order to reverse some of the environmental effects brought on by current social norms. In societies like China, the government has put policies in place that regulate the number of children allowed to a couple. Other societies have already begun to implement social marketing strategies in order to educate the public on overpopulation effects. "The intervention can be widespread and done at a low cost. A variety of print materials (flyers, brochures, fact sheets, stickers) needs to be produced and distributed throughout the communities such as at local places of worship, sporting events, local food markets, schools and at car parks (taxis / bus stands)."[260]

Such prompts work to introduce the problem so that social norms are easier to implement. Certain government policies are making it easier and more socially acceptable to use contraception and abortion methods. An example of a country whose laws and norms are hindering the global effort to slow population growth is Afghanistan. "The approval by Afghan President Hamid Karzai of the Shia Personal Status Law in March 2009 effectively destroyed Shia women's rights and freedoms in Afghanistan. Under this law, women have no right to deny their husbands sex unless they are ill, and can be denied food if they do."[261]

Education and empowerment

One option is to focus on education about overpopulation, family planning, and birth control methods, and to make birth-control devices like male and female condoms, pills and intrauterine devices easily available. Worldwide, nearly 40% of pregnancies are unintended (some 80 million unintended pregnancies each year).[262] An estimated 350 million women in the poorest countries of the world either did not want their last child, do not want another child or want to space their pregnancies, but they lack access to information, affordable means and services to determine the size and spacing of their families. In the United States, in 2001, almost half of pregnancies were unintended.[263] In the developing world, some 514,000 women die annually of complications from pregnancy and abortion,[264] with 86% of these deaths occurring in the sub-Saharan Africa region and South Asia.[265] Additionally, 8 million infants die, many because of malnutrition or preventable diseases, especially from lack of access to clean drinking water.[266]

Women's rights and their reproductive rights in particular are issues regarded to have vital importance in the debate.[267]

"The only ray of hope I can see – and it's not much – is that wherever women are put in control of their lives, both politically and socially; where medical facilities allow them to deal with birth control and where their husbands allow them to make those decisions, birth rate falls. Women don't want to have 12 kids of whom nine will die." David Attenborough[268]

Egypt announced a program to reduce its overpopulation by family planning education and putting women in the workforce. It was announced in June 2008 by the Minister of Health and Population Hatem el-Gabali. The government has set aside 480 million Egyptian pounds (about $90 million US) for the program.[269]

The business magnate Ted Turner proposed a "voluntary, non-imposed" one-child family scenario. A "pledge two or fewer" campaign is run by Population Matters (a UK population concern organisation), in which people are encouraged to limit themselves to small family size.

Birth regulations

Overpopulation is related to the issue of birth control; some nations, like the People's Republic of China, use strict measures to reduce birth rates. Religious and ideological opposition to birth control has been cited as a factor contributing to overpopulation and poverty.[270]

Sanjay Gandhi, son of late Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi, implemented a forced sterilization programme between 1975 and 1977. Officially, men with two children or more had to submit to sterilization, but there was a greater focus on sterilizing women than sterilizing men. Some unmarried young men, political opponents and ignorant men were also believed to have been sterilized . This program is still remembered and criticized in India, and is blamed for creating a public aversion to family planning, which hampered government programmes for decades.[271]

Urban designer Michael E. Arth has proposed a "choice-based, marketable birth license plan" he calls "birth credits".[272] Birth credits would allow any woman to have as many children as she wants, as long as she buys a license for any children beyond an average allotment that would result in zero population growth. If that allotment was determined to be one child, for example, then the first child would be free, and the market would determine what the license fee for each additional child would cost. Extra credits would expire after a certain time, so these credits could not be hoarded by speculators. The actual cost of the credits would only be a fraction of the actual cost of having and raising a child, so the credits would serve more as a wake-up call to women who might otherwise produce children without seriously considering the long term consequences to themselves or society.[273]

Another choice-based approach, similar to Arth's birth credits, is financial compensation or other benefits (free goods and/or services) by the state (or state-owned companies) offered to people who voluntarily undergo sterilization. Such compensation has been offered in the past by the government of India.[274]

In 2014 the United Nations estimated there is an 80% likelihood that the world's population will be between 9.6 billion and 12.3 billion by 2100. Most of the world's expected population increase will be in Africa and southern Asia. Africa's population is expected to rise from the current one billion to three or four billion by 2100, and Asia could add another billion in the same period.[275] Because the median age of Africans is so low (e.g. Uganda = 15 years old) birth credits would have to limit fertility to one child per two women to reach the levels of developed countries immediately. For countries with a wide base in their population pyramid it will take a generation for the people who are of child bearing age to have their families.[273] An example of demographic momentum is China, which added perhaps 400,000 more people after its one-child policy was enacted. Arth has suggested that the focus should be on the developed countries and that some combination of birth credits and additional compensation supplied by the developed countries could rapidly lead to zero population growth while also quickly raising the standard of living in developing countries.[273]

Infectious agents

There are also natural diseases, such as chlamydia, gonorrhea and even some diseases that produce no physical discomfort at all (such as some specific adeno-associated viruses[276]) that may also cause sterilization of males and/or females in the population.[277][278][279] Whereas the natural occurrence of these diseases is not sufficient to significantly reduce the population problem, large-scale production of these diseases and human-induced release of such diseases could quite well be used as a mitigation measure.

Extraterrestrial settlement

Main article: Space colonization
See also: Space advocacy

Various scientists and science fiction authors have contemplated that overpopulation on Earth may be remedied in the future by the use of extraterrestrial settlements. In the 1970s, Gerard K. O'Neill suggested building space habitats that could support 30,000 times the carrying capacity of Earth using just the asteroid belt, and that the Solar System as a whole could sustain current population growth rates for a thousand years.[280] Marshall Savage (1992, 1994) has projected a human population of five quintillion (5 x 1018) throughout the Solar System by 3000, with the majority in the asteroid belt.[281] Freeman Dyson (1999) favours the Kuiper belt as the future home of humanity, suggesting this could happen within a few centuries.[282] In Mining the Sky, John S. Lewis suggests that the resources of the solar system could support 10 quadrillion (1016) people. In an interview, Stephen Hawking claimed that overpopulation is a threat to human existence and "our only chance of long-term survival is not to remain inward looking on planet Earth but to spread out into space."[283]

K. Eric Drexler, famous inventor of the futuristic concept of molecular nanotechnology, has suggested in Engines of Creation that colonizing space will mean breaking the Malthusian limits to growth for the human species.

It may be possible for other parts of the Solar System to be inhabited by humanity at some point in the future. Geoffrey Landis of NASA's Glenn Research Center in particular has pointed out that "[at] cloud-top level, Venus is the paradise planet", as one could construct aerostat habitats and floating cities there easily, based on the concept that breathable air is a lifting gas in the dense Venusian atmosphere. Venus would, like also Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, in the upper layers of their atmospheres, even afford a gravitation almost exactly as strong as that on Earth (see colonization of Venus).[284]

Many science fiction authors, including Carl Sagan, Arthur C. Clarke,[285] and Isaac Asimov,[286] have argued that shipping any excess population into space is not a viable solution to human overpopulation. According to Clarke, "the population battle must be fought or won here on Earth".[285] The problem for these authors is not the lack of resources in space (as shown in books such as Mining the Sky[287]), but the physical impracticality of shipping vast numbers of people into space to "solve" overpopulation on Earth. However, Gerard K. O'Neill's calculations show that Earth could offload all new population growth with a launch services industry about the same size as the current airline industry.[288]

The StarTram concept, by James R. Powell (the co-inventor of maglev transport) and others, envisions a capability to send up to 4 million people a decade to space per facility.[289] A hypothetical extraterrestrial colony could potentially grow by reproduction only (i.e., without any immigration), with all of the inhabitants being the direct descendants of the original colonists.


Despite the increase in population density within cities (and the emergence of megacities), UN Habitat states in its reports that urbanization may be the best compromise in the face of global population growth.[290] Cities concentrate human activity within limited areas, limiting the breadth of environmental damage.[291] But this mitigating influence can only be achieved if urban planning is significantly improved[292] and city services are properly maintained.

See also

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Human overpopulation


  1. Ehrlich, Paul R. Ehrlich & Anne H. (1990). The population explosion. London: Hutchinson. pp. 39–40. ISBN 0091745519. Retrieved 20 July 2014. When is an area overpopulated? When its population can not be maintained without rapidly depleting nonrenewable resources [39] (or converting renewable resources into nonrenewable ones) and without decreasing the capacity of the environment to support the population. In short, if the long-term carrying capacity of an area is clearly being degraded by its current human occupants, that area is overpopulated.
  2. "Global food crisis looms as climate change and population growth strip fertile land". (2007-08-31).
  4. 1 2 "BBC News – Population seven billion: UN sets out challenges". BBC. 2013-05-22. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  5. 1 2 Zinkina J., Korotayev A. Explosive Population Growth in Tropical Africa: Crucial Omission in Development Forecasts (Emerging Risks and Way Out). World Futures 70/2 (2014): 120–139.
  6. "U.S. and World Population Clock". Retrieved 2016-03-05.
  7. "Population seven billion: UN sets out challenges". BBC. 2011-10-26. Retrieved 2011-10-27.
  8. Coleman, Jasmine (2011-10-31). "World's 'seven billionth baby' is born". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2011-10-31.
  9. "7 billion people is a 'serious challenge'". External link in |website= (help)
  10. "World Population Clock – Worldometers". Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  11. "International Data Base (IDB) – World Population". 2010-06-28. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  12. "World Population Prospects:The 2008 Revision" (PDF). Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. June 2009.
  13. "World Population Prospects:The 2010 Revision Press Release" (PDF). Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. May 2011.
  14. "joint statement by fifty-eight of the world's scientific academies". Archived from the original on 10 February 2010.
  15. WRIGHT, OLIVER. "Britain's food self-sufficiency at risk from reliance on overseas imports of fruit and vegetables that could be produced at home". Retrieved 11 July 2014. External link in |website= (help)
  16. Fred Pearce (2009-04-13). "Consumption Dwarfs Population as Main Environmental Threat". Yale University. Retrieved 2012-11-12.
  17. Roberts, R.E. (1924). The Theology of Tertullian, Chapter 5 (pp. 79–119). (2001-07-14). Retrieved on 2012-08-29.
  18. George Moffet, Critical Masses: The Global Population Challenge (1994): "[the world's population remained] capped by birth rates and death rates locked in a seemingly permanent equilibrium."
  19. "VII, paragraph 10, lines 8-10". An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: J. Johnson,. 1798. The power of population is so superior to the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race
  20. 1 2 Gregory Claeys: The "Survival of the Fittest" and the Origins of Social Darwinism, in: Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2002, p. 223–240
  21. Cormac Ó Gráda: Famine. A Short History, Princeton University Press 2009, ISBN 978-0-691-12237-3 (pp. 20, 203–206)
  22. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division. World Population to 2300.
  23. World population to keep growing this century, hit 11 billion by 2100. UWToday. September 18, 2014
  24. 1 2 Harris, Paul (October 22, 2011). "Population of world 'could grow to 15bn by 2100'". The Guardian. Retrieved August 31, 2016.
  25. "Current World Population". Worldometers. Retrieved 2014-04-18.
  26. "A Brief Introduction to the History of Climate". Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories. Retrieved May 22, 2013.
  27. "The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution" (PDF). Council For Economic Education. p. 46. Retrieved May 22, 2013.
  28. "What was the population of the world in the past?", World-o-meters
  29. "Plague, Plague Information, Black Death Facts, News, Photos". National Geographic. Retrieved 3 November 2008.
  30. "Epidemics and pandemics: their impacts on human history". J. N. Hays (2005). p.46. ISBN 1-85109-658-2
  31. "Historical Estimates of World Population". Retrieved 3 November 2008.
  32. "History of Europe – Demographic and agricultural growth". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  33. "Europe's Black Death is a history lesson in human tragedy – and economic renewal". TIME Europe. 17 July 2000, VOL. 156 NO. 3
  34. "History of Europe – Demographics". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  35. "China's Population: Readings and Maps". Columbia University, East Asian Curriculum Project.
  36. Ming Dynasty: Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2009 at the Wayback Machine (archived 26 January 2009)
  37. "Qing China's Internal Crisis: Land Shortage, Famine, Rural Poverty". Asia for Educators, Columbia University.
  38. J. N. Hays (1998). "The burdens of disease: epidemics and human response in western history.". p 72. ISBN 0-8135-2528-4
  39. "The Story Of... Smallpox – and other Deadly Eurasian Germs". Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).
  40. "Stacy Goodling, "Effects of European Diseases on the Inhabitants of the New World""
  41. 1 2 "International Programs". External link in |website= (help)
  42. "modelling exponential growth" (PDF). External link in |website= (help)
  43. "CO2 EMISSIONS FROM FUEL COMBUSTION I E A S T A T I S T I C S International Energy Agency H I G H L I G H T S" (PDF). External link in |website= (help)
  44. 1 2 "The limits of a Green Revolution?". BBC News. 29 March 2007.
  45. United Nations, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2011): World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision at the Wayback Machine (archived 12 May 2011)
  46. Widjojo Nitisastro (2006). "Population Trends in Indonesia". Equinox Publishing. p. 268. ISBN 979-3780-43-6. Retrieved 6 November 2011.
  47. "Central Bureau of Statistics: Census 2010" (PDF) (in Indonesian). Badan Pusat Statistik. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
  48. "Census Population" (PDF). Census of India. Ministry of Finance India. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
  49. "Provisional Population Totals – Census 2011". Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. 2011. Retrieved 29 March 2011.
  50. "Transitions in World Population" (PDF). Population Reference Bureau (PRB).
  51. Akin L. Mabogunje (May 4, 1995). "The Environmental Challenges In Sub Saharan Africa". African Technology Forum. Retrieved May 22, 2013.
  52. "Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)". CIA. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
  53. "Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation - Chad". World Food Program. Retrieved May 22, 2013.
  54. "UN report – 2004 data" (PDF).
  55. "World Population Clock – Worldometers". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  56. "International Data Base (IDB) – World Population". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  57. Archived 29 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
  58. Walter Greiling: Wie werden wir leben? ("How are we going to live?") Econ publishers, Munich 1954
  59. "World Population Prospects". United Nations. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  60. 1 2 "UN homepage". External link in |website= (help)
  61. WORLD POPULATION TO 2300 (PDF). United Nations. 2004. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  62. "US Census Bureau estimates and news release.of AUG. 14, 2008". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  63. "Principal Agglomerations of the World". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  64. Lewis, Mark (2007-06-11). "Megacities Of The Future". Forbes. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  65. "Nigeria: Lagos, the mega-city of slums". Archived from the original on 18 February 2011. External link in |website= (help)
  66. Whitehouse, David (2005-05-19). "Half of humanity set to go urban". BBC News. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  67. "Planet of Slums – The Third World's Megacities". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  68. "The world goes to town". The Economist. 3 May 2007. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  69. "Planet of Slums by Mike Davis". 20 May 2006. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  70. "Lagos, Nigeria facts". National Geographic. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  71. [email protected] (16 September 2004). "China's urban population to reach 800 to 900 million by 2020: expert". People's Daily. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  72. Deevey, E.S. (1960). "The Human Population", Scientific American, Volume 203, pp.195-204.
  73. Huesemann, M.H., and J.A. Huesemann (2011). Technofix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us or the Environment, "Unintended Consequences of Technological Revolutions", New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada, ISBN 0865717044, pp. 43-46.
  74. Huesemann, M.H., and J.A. Huesemann (2011). Technofix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us or the Environment, "Unintended Consequences of Industrial Agriculture", New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada, pp. 23-25.
  75. McKeown, T. (1988). The Origins of Human Disease, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
  76. "Agriculture and Human Population Growth". CK-12.
  77. Rosenthal, Elisabeth (2012-04-18). "Nigeria Tested by Rapid Rise in Population". New York: New York Times. Retrieved 2012-11-26.
  78. Rosenthal, Elisabeth (14 April 2012). "In Nigeria, a Preview of an Overcrowded Planet". The New York Times.
  79. 1 2 "International Programs - Region Summary - U.S. Census Bureau". Retrieved 2013-09-22.
  80. Myrskylä, M.; Kohler, H. P.; Billari, F. C. (2009). "Advances in development reverse fertility declines". Nature. 460 (7256): 741–743. doi:10.1038/nature08230. PMID 19661915.
  81. King, M.; Elliott, C. (1996). "Averting a world food shortage: Tighten your belts for CAIRO II". BMJ. 313 (7063): 995–997. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7063.995. PMC 2352328Freely accessible. PMID 8892423.
  82. "World Resources Institute". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  83. Morales, Alex (2006-10-24). "Canada". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  84. "WWF – Living Planet Report 2006". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  85. "WWF LIving planet report". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  86. Ecological Footprint Atlas 2009, Global Footprint Network,
  87. Martin, Roger (2010). "Stopping at two children is better for the planet". BBC HARDtalk. |first2= missing |last2= in Authors list (help)
  88. Living Planet Report 2014 (PDF), World Wildlife Fund, retrieved November 20, 2016
  90. Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh and Harmen Verbruggen (1999). "Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the 'ecological footprint'" (PDF). Ecological Economics. 29 (1): 61–72. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00032-4.
  91. "Planning and Markets: Peter Gordon and Harry W. Richardson". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  92. Ryerson, W. F. (2010). "Population, The Multiplier of Everything Else". In McKibben, D. The Post Carbon Reader: Managing the 21st Century Sustainability Crisis. Watershed Media. ISBN 978-0-9709500-6-2
  93. Brown, L. R. (2012). World on the Edge. Earth Policy Institute. Norton. ISBN 9781136540752.
  94. David Pimentel; Mario Giampietro (21 November 1994). FOOD, LAND, POPULATION and the U.S. ECONOMY (Report). Washington, D.C.: Carrying Capacity Network. Retrieved 2014-09-07.
  95. "Eating Fossil Fuels |". 21 November 1994. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  96. Cohen, J.E. (1995). How many people can the earth support? W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY, USA.
  97. Van Den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M.; Rietveld, Piet (2004). "Reconsidering the Limits to World Population: Meta-analysis and Meta-prediction". BioScience. 54 (3): 195. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0195:RTLTWP]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0006-3568.
  98. Diamond, Jared: (2008-01-02). "What's Your Consumption Factor?" The New York Times
  99. 1 2 Shiklomanov, I. A. (2000). "Appraisal and Assessment of World Water Resources". Water International. 25: 11–32. doi:10.1080/02508060008686794.
  100. "French-run water plant launched in Israel".
  101. "Black & Veatch-Designed Desalination Plant Wins Global Water Distinction".
  102. Hubbert, M.K. Techniques of Prediction as Applied to Production of Oil and Gas, US Department of Commerce, NBS Special Publication 631, May 1982
  103. "The Wall Street Journal Online – Outside the Box". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  104. 1 2 Wilson, E.O. (2002). The Future of Life, Vintage ISBN 0-679-76811-4
  105. "Worldwide Deforestation Rates".
  106. International Energy Outlook 2000, Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. (2000)
  107. "The world in 2050:Impact of global growth on carbon emissions". 2006-10-30. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  108. UNEP, Global Environmental Outlook 2000, Earthscan Publications, London, UK (1999)
  109. Polgreen, Lydia (11 February 2007). "Trees and crops reclaim desert in Niger". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  110. Leakey, Richard and Roger Lewin, 1996, The Sixth Extinction : Patterns of Life and the Future of Humankind, Anchor, ISBN 0-385-46809-1
  111. Humans Are Causing the Sixth Mass Extinction in the Earth's History, Says Study. Vice. June 23, 2015. See also: Ceballos, Gerardo; Ehrlich, Paul R.; Barnosky, Anthony D.; García, Andrés; Pringle, Robert M.; Palmer, Todd M. (2015). "Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction". Science Advances. 1 (5): e1400253. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400253.
  112. S.L. Pimm, G.J. Russell, J.L. Gittleman and T.M. Brooks, The Future of Biodiversity, Science 269: 347–350 (1995)
  113. IUCN Red List at the Wayback Machine (archived 6 March 2009)
  114. "Citizens arrest". The Guardian. July 11, 2007.
  115. "Population Bomb Author's Fix For Next Extinction: Educate Women". Scientific American. August 12, 2008.
  116. We Are Breeding Ourselves to Extinction. Chris Hedges for Truthdig. March 8, 2009
  117. U.S. National Research Council, Commission on the Science of Climate Change, Washington, D.C. (2001)
  118. Image:Infant mortality vs.jpg
  119. ""Emerging Infectious Diseases" by Mark E.J. Woolhouse and Sonya Gowtage-Sequeria". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  120. "WHO Infectious Diseases Report". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  121. 1 2 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2001). Food Insecurity: When People Live With Hunger and Fear Starvation. The State of Food insecurity in the World 2001. FAO, ISBN 92-5-104628-X
  122. 1 2 Williams, Walter (1999-02-24). Population control nonsense.
  123. Sherk, James. "Index of Economic Freedom". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  124. McGranahan, G.; Lewin, S.; Fransen, T.; Hunt, C.; Kjellén, M.; Pretty, J.; Stephens, C.; Virgin, I. (2000). "News and notes: Environmental change and human health in countries of Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific". Global Change and Human Health. 1: 9. doi:10.1023/A:1011567429284.
  125. "Wastewater Pollution in China". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  126. "Clean water could save millions of lives". Retrieved 9 July 2014.
  127. American Council for the United Nations University (2002)
  128. Heidelberger Institut fur International Konfliktforschung, Konfliktbarometer 2003: 12. Jarlickhe Konfliktanalyse University of Heidelberg, Germany (2004)
  129. "BRAVE NEW WORLD REVISITED: overpopulation". Retrieved 9 July 2014.
  130. "People and Planet speech". Royal Society of Arts.
  131. David Attenborough - Humans are plague on Earth. The Telegraph. 22 January 2013.
  132. Sowell, Thomas (1998-02-12). Julian Simon, combatant in a 200-year war.
  133. 1 2 3 Ron Nielsen, The Little Green Handbook: Seven Trends Shaping the Future of Our Planet, Picador, New York (2006) ISBN 978-0-312-42581-4
  134. Pentti Linkola, "Can Life Prevail?", Arktos Media, 2nd Revised ed. 2011. pp. 120-121. ISBN 1907166637.
  135. "Another Inconvenient Truth: The World's Growing Population Poses a Malthusian Dilemma". Scientific American (2009-10-02).
  136. Bashford, Alison. "Population, Geopolitics, and International Organizations in the Mid Twentieth Century." Journal of World History 19.3 (2008): 327-347. Humanities Source Database. Web. 9 Nov 2013.
  137. David Biello (2012-09-26). "Will Humanity Face a Carbohydrate Shortage?". Scientific American. Retrieved 2014-04-29.
  138. "U.S. and World Population Clock". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2014-04-29.
  139. David Pimentel, et al. "Will Limits of the Earth's Resources Control Human Numbers?",
  140. Lester R. Brown, Gary Gardner, Brian Halweil (September 1998). Worldwatch Paper #143: Beyond Malthus: Sixteen Dimensions of the Population Problem, Worldwatch Institute, ISBN 1-878071-45-9
  141. 1 2
  142. "Earth's natural wealth: an audit". 23 May 2007. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  143. "Dominic Lawson: The population timebomb is a myth The doom-sayers are becoming more fashionable just as experts are coming to the view it has all been one giant false alarm". The Independent. UK. 18 January 2011. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  144. Post a Comment. "Misleading Math about the Earth: Scientific American". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  145. "NASA Earth Science Data and Services: Checking Earth's Vital Signs". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  146. "Ecosystem Change: Scientific Facts on Ecosystem Change". 2011-10-17. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  147. "USGS OFR 02-349: Human Impact on the Planet: An Earth Science Perspective and Ethical Considerations". 2002-10-07. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  148. "1. How have ecosystems changed?". 2011-10-17. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  149. 1 2 "Ecosystem Change: Scientific Facts on Ecosystem Change". 2011-10-17. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  150. "3. How have ecosystem changes affected human well-being and poverty alleviation?". 2011-10-17. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  151. "Global Environmental Outlook – 4". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  152. "Global Environment Outlook: environment for development (GEO-4)". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  153. "UN World Population Report 2001" (PDF). p. 34. Retrieved 16 December 2008.
  154. Brown, Lester R. and Halweil, Brian (1999-09-23). Population Outrunning Water Supply as World Hits 6 Billion. Worldwatch Institute.
  155. Fred Pearce (2007). When the Rivers Run Dry: Water—The Defining Crisis of the Twenty-first Century. Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-8573-8.
  156. Worldwatch, The. Outgrowing the Earth: The Food Security Challenge in an Age of Falling Water Tables and Rising Temperatures: Books: Lester R. Brown. ISBN 0393060705.
  157. "Nuclear Desalination". Archived from the original on 8 February 2007. External link in |website= (help)
  158. Cohen, Bernard L. (1983). "Breeder reactors: A renewable energy source" (PDF). American Journal of Physics. 51 (1): 75–76. Bibcode:1983AmJPh..51...75C. doi:10.1119/1.13440.
  159. "Who Owns Water?". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  160. 1 2 "EJP | News | France | French-run water plant launched in Israel". 2005-12-28. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  161. 1 2 "Black & Veatch-Designed Desalination Plant Wins Global Water Distinction". 4 May 2006. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  162. "Desalination gets a serious look". External link in |website= (help)
  163. 1 2 Zhou, Yuan; Tol, Richard S. J. (2005). "Evaluating the costs of desalination and water transport". Water Resources Research. 41 (3): W03003. Bibcode:2005WRR....4103003Z. doi:10.1029/2004WR003749.
  164. "100 Largest Desalination Plants Planned, in Construction, or in Operation—1 January 2005" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  165. "Water, Water, Everywhere". External link in |website= (help)
  166. "Desalination is the Solution to Water Shortages". External link in |website= (help)
  167. Wald, Chelsea (2012-02-15). Uncharted waters: Probing aquifers to head off war. New Scientist
  168. Haynes, Michael; Husan, Rumy (2000). "National inequality and the catch-up period: Some "growth alone" scenarios"". Journal of Economic Issues. 34 (3): 693–705. JSTOR 4227593. In a world that now produces more food than is necessary to feed all its population [UN 1994], there is no excuse for hunger and starvation.
  169. Gilland, B. (2002). "World population and food supply". Food Policy. 27: 47–38. doi:10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00002-7.
  170. "Human Appropriation of the World's Food Supply". 2000-12-15. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  171. "Pushing Beyond the Earth's Limits The Japan Syndrome". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  172. 1 2 "The Food Bubble Economy". 12 April 2002. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  173. "UN World Population Report 2001" (PDF). p. 38. Retrieved 2008-12-16.
  174. Food and Agriculture Organization Economic and Social Development Department. "The State of Food Insecurity in the World, 2008 : High food prices and food security – threats and opportunities". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2008, p. 2.
  175. "1.02 billion people hungry". External link in |website= (help)
  176. "The truth about the environment". The Economist. 2001-08-02.
  177. 1 2 Pimm, Stuart; Harvey, Jeff (2001). "No need to worry about the future" (PDF). Nature. 414 (6860): 149. doi:10.1038/35102629.
  178. Kindall, Henery W; Pimentel, David (May 1994). "Constraints on the Expansion of the Global Food Supply". Ambio. 23 (3).
  179. "Feed the world? We are fighting a losing battle, UN admits". The Guardian (2008-02-26).
  180. "Nearly 1 in 5 Chinese overweight or obese – Diet and nutrition". MSNBC. 2006-08-18. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  181. Retrieved June 1, 2016. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  182. "Relationship Between Poverty and Overweight or Obesity « Food Research & Action Center". Retrieved 2013-09-22.
  183. "Data sobering on Ohio kids' poverty, obesity | The Columbus Dispatch". 2012-06-13. Retrieved 2013-09-22.
  184. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2006. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2006) ISBN 92-5-105580-7
  185. "2008: The year of global food crisis". 8 March 2008. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  186. "The global grain bubble". 18 January 2008. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  187. James Randerson, science correspondent (7 March 2008). "Food crisis will take hold before climate change, warns chief scientist". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  188. John Vidal, environment editor (3 November 2007). "Global food crisis looms as climate change and fuel shortages bite". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  189. Walsoft (2008-02-22). "Experts: Global Food Shortages Could 'Continue for Decades'". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  190. Moya K. Mason. "Has Urbanization Caused a Loss to Agricultural Land?". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  191. Walt, Vivienne (2008-02-27). "The World's Growing Food-Price Crisis". Time. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  192. "The cost of food: Facts and figures". BBC News. 2008-10-16. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  193. Jonathan Watts in Beijing (2007-12-04). "Riots and hunger feared as demand for grain sends food costs soaring". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  194. Roland Watson and Sam Fleming 30 November 2011 12:01 am (2009-06-25). "Already we have riots, hoarding, panic: the sign of things to come?". The Times. UK. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  195. Julian Borger, diplomatic editor (2008-02-26). "Feed the world? We are fighting a losing battle, UN admits". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  196. Robin McKie; Xan Rice (2007-04-22). "Millions face famine as crop disease rages". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  197. "Billions at risk from wheat super-blight". New Scientist Magazine (2598): 6–7. 2007-04-03. Retrieved 19 April 2007.
  198. "IRAN: Killer fungus threatens wheat production in western areas". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  199. "'Peak Oil' and the German Government: Military Study Warns of a Potentially Drastic Oil Crisis". External link in |website= (help)
  200. "Global threat to food supply as water wells dry up, warns top environment expert". The Guardian. 6 July 2013.
  201. "World faces 'perfect storm' of problems by 2030, chief scientist to warn". The Guardian. 18 March 2009.
  202. "Global crisis 'to strike by 2030'". BBC News. 19 March 2009.
  203. "Global food production will have to increase 70% for additional 2.3 billion people by 2050". 24 September 2009.
  204. "Africa may be able to feed only 25% of its population by 2025". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  205. "Birth rates 'must be curbed to win war on global poverty'". The Independent. 31 January 2007.
  206. "Chinese concern at obesity surge". BBC News. 2004-10-12. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
  207. Brown, Lester R. (2002-09-08). Global Water Shortages May Lead to Food Shortages—Aquifer Depletion. Retrieved on 2012-08-29.
  208. "Japan warned of food shortage". Retrieved June 1, 2016., The Australian
  209. 1 2 3 Hopfenberg, Russell and Pimentel, David, "Human Population Numbers as a Function of Food Supply", Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 1, March 2001, pp. 1–15
  210. Hopfenberg, R. (2003). "Human Carrying Capacity is Determined by Food Availability". Population and Environment. 25 (2): 109–117. doi:10.1023/B:POEN.0000015560.69479.c1.
  211. Abernathy, Virginia, Population Politics ISBN 0-7658-0603-7
  212. Hardin, Garrett (1974). "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor". Psychology Today. 8: 38–43.
  213. Manning, Richard (7 Sep 2011). "Richard Manning on the Green Revolution and the End of Cheap Oil". YouTube (Interview). Interview with Sally Erickson and Timothy Scott Bennett. Retrieved 15 Oct 2013.
  214. Food Production & Population Growth, video with Daniel Quinn and Alan Thornhill
  215. Quinn, Daniel, Ishmael Bantam/Turner, 1995, ISBN 0613080939
  216. Zerzan, John (April 2, 2008). On Modernity and the Technosphere (Speech). Binghamton University.
  217. Farb, Peter: 1978, Humankind. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
  218. Daniel Quinn (1996). The Story of B, pp. 304–305, Random House Publishing Group, ISBN 0553379011.
  219. Quinn, Daniel: "The Question (ID Number 122)", Retrieved October 2014 from
  220. "Asia Times Online :: South Asia news – India grows a grain crisis". 21 July 2006. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  221. "WATER DEFICITS GROWING IN MANY COUNTRIES Water Shortages May Cause Food Shortages". Archived from the original on 13 July 2009.
  222. "Domesticating the World: Conversion of Natural Ecosystems". World Resources Institute. September 2000.
  223. "Grasslands in Pieces: Modification and Conversion Take a Toll". World Resources Institute. December 2000.
  224. "GLOBIO, an initiative of the United Nations Environment Programme (Archive)". 30 June 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-06-30. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  225. John Houghton, Global Warming: The Complete Briefing, Cambridge University Press, 2009 ISBN 978-0-521-70916-3
  226. Young, A. (1999). "Is there Really Spare Land? A Critique of Estimates of Available Cultivable Land in Developing Countries". Environment, Development and Sustainability. 1: 3–2. doi:10.1023/A:1010055012699.
  227. "Meet the first resident of Dubai's palm-shaped man-made island". Daily Mail. London. 22 June 2007.
  228. Cooke, Jeremy (19 June 2007). "Vertical farming in the big Apple". BBC News. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
  229. "Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth". Retrieved 13 February 2010.
  230. "World oil supplies are set to run out faster than expected, warn scientists". The Independent. 14 June 2007.
  231. "Al Gore's Vision of Global Salvation". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  232. "Gasoline – Energy Explained, Your Guide To Understanding Energy". Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  233. Hirsch, Robert L.; Bezdek, Roger; Wendling, Robert (February 2005). "Peaking Of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, & Risk Management" (PDF). Science Applications International Corporation/U.S.Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. Retrieved 28 November 2009.
  234. Hirsch, Robert L. (February 2007). "Peaking of World Oil Production: Recent Forecasts" (PDF). Science Applications International Corporation/U.S.Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. Retrieved 19 February 2015.
  235. "We Will Never Run Out of Oil". 27 June 2011. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  236. Lemley, Brad (1 May 2003). "Anything Into Oil | Alternative Energy". DISCOVER Magazine. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  237. Lemley, Brad (2 April 2006). "Anything Into Oil | Alternative Energy". DISCOVER Magazine. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  238. "The World Bank Group". 22 July 2004. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  239. Forget 'developing' poor countries, it's time to 'de-develop' rich countries. The Guardian. September 23, 2015.
  240. "3. How have ecosystem changes affected human well-being and poverty alleviation?". 2011-10-17. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  241. "Field Listing: Total Fertility Rate". The World Factbook. Retrieved 2016-04-24.
  242. "Country Comparison: GDP - Per Capita (PPP)". The World Factbook. Retrieved 2016-04-24.
  243. Brand, Stewart (2009-10-24). Lecture Series presented by KPMG – Whole Earth Discipline. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Perimeter Institute, Quantum to Cosmos (Q2C) Festival. Event occurs at 50:30. Retrieved 2009-10-25.
  244. "A plague of people". Cosmos. 13 May 2010.
  245. Human overpopulation. Animal Welfare Institute. Retrieved 2014/10/25 from
  246. Daily, Gretchen C. and Ellison, Katherine (2003) The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable, Island Press ISBN 1559631546
  247. Rifkin, Jeremy (2006-12-24). "The risks of too much city in a crowded world". Toronto Star.
  248. "UN World Population Report 2001" (PDF). p. 31. Retrieved 16 December 2008.
  249. "Booming nations 'threaten Earth'". BBC News (2006-01-12).
  250. "State of the World 2006: China and India Hold World in Balance". Worldwatch Institute. 11 January 2006.
  251. "Effects of Over-Consumption and Increasing Populations". 26 September 2001. Retrieved 19 June 2007.
  252. John T. Houghton (2004)."Global warming: the complete briefing". Cambridge University Press. p.326. ISBN 0-521-52874-7
  253. "Once taboo, population enters climate debate". The Independent. London. 2009-12-05. Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  254. Neurath, Paul (1994). From Malthus to the Club of Rome and back : problems of limits to growth, population control, and migrations. Armonk, NY [u.a.]: Sharpe. p. 6. ISBN 978-1563244070.
  255. "Quotations". Retrieved 1 July 2014. External link in |website= (help)
  256. Champion, Tony (2005). "Chapter 4: Demographic transformations". In Daniels, Peter; Bradshaw, Michael; Shaw, Denis; Sidaway, James. An Introduction to Human Geography Issues for the 21st Century Second edition. Pearson Education. pp. 88–111. ISBN 0-131-21766-6.
  257. 1 2 Turchin P., Korotayev A. Population Dynamics and Internal Warfare: A Reconsideration. Social Evolution & History 5/2 (2006): 112–147.
  258. Korotayev A., Malkov A., Khaltourina D. Introduction to Social Macrodynamics. Secular Cycles and Millennial Trends. Moscow: URSS, 2006
  259. Korotayev A.V., Khaltourina D.A. Introduction to Social Macrodynamics: Secular Cycles and Millennial Trends in Africa. Moscow: URSS, 2006. ISBN 5-484-00560-4;
  260. "Utilizing social marketing and social norms to address problems in gambia". 2009-08-13. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  261. "Put women's rights back on the afghan". Daily News Egypt. 2010-08-27. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  262. "Population growth driving climate change, poverty: experts". Agence France-Presse (2009-09-21).
  263. Finer, Lawrence B.; Henshaw, Stanley K. (2006). "Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001". Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 38 (2): 90–96. doi:10.1363/3809006. PMID 16772190.
  264. "Netherlands Again Number One Donor to United Nations Population Fund". United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
  265. "Maternal mortality ratio falling too slowly to meet goal". WHO (2007-10-12).
  266. Fornos, Werner (2001-12-10). "Q: should the United Nations support more family-planning services for poor countries?". Insight on the News.
  267. "Population Matters search on "reproductive rights"". Population Matters. External link in |website= (help)
  268. "Sir David Attenborough on the roots of Climatic problems". The Independent, UK broadsheet newspaper.
  269. Independent Newspapers Online (11 June 2008). "Population woes weigh down Egypt". IOL. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  270. "Birth rates 'must be curbed to win war on global poverty'". The Independent. London. 31 January 2007. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
  271. Vinay Lal. Indira Gandhi, UCLA College of Letters and Science
  272. "Interview: City Architect and Reconstructor Michael E. Arth by Alex Birch". 22 May 2008. Retrieved 30 November 2011.
  273. 1 2 3 Arth, Michael E., Democracy and the Common Wealth: Breaking the Stranglehold of the Special Interests, Golden Apples Media, 2010, Chapter 35: "Overpopulation" pp. 352-362
  274. Goods for sterilization
  275. Kunzig, Robert, "A world with 11 billion people? New population projections shatter earlier estimates." National Geographic, September 18, 2014,
  276. Adeno-associated virus causing infertility
  277. Chlamydia and gonorrhea able to cause infertility
  278. Gonorrhea causing infertility
  279. Chlamydia causing infertility
  280. The High Frontier (1976, 2000) Gerard O'Neill, Apogee Books ISBN 1-896522-67-X
  281. Marshall Savage, (1992, 1994) The Millennial Project: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps. Little, Brown. ISBN 0-316-77163-5
  282. Freeman Dyson, The Sun, The Genome, and The Internet (1999) Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-513922-4
  283. The Telegraph. Stephen Hawking: mankind must move to outer space within a century. (August 2010)
  284. Nancy Atkinson (16 July 2008). "Colonizing Venus With Floating Cities". Universe Today. Retrieved 16 July 2011.
  285. 1 2 Greetings, Carbon-Based Bipeds! (1999) Arthur C. Clarke, Voyager ISBN 0-00-224698-8
  286. The Good Earth Is Dying (1971) Isaac Asimov (published in Der Spiegel)
  287. Mining the Sky (1996) John S. Lewis. Addison Wesley. ISBN 0-201-47959-1
  288. O'Neill, Gerard K. (1981). 2081: A Hopeful View of the Human Future. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-671-44751-3.
  289. "StarTram2010: Maglev Launch: Ultra Low Cost Ultra High Volume Access to Space for Cargo and Humans". Retrieved 23 April 2011.
  290. "UN Habitat calling urban living 'a good thing". BBC News. 27 June 2007. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  291. "National Geographic Magazine; Special report 2008: Changing Climate (Village Green-article by Michelle Nijhuis)". 29 September 2011. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  292. "UN Habitat calling to rethink urban planning". Retrieved 2011-11-30.

Further reading

Look up overpopulation in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Introduction to Sociology/Demography
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.