Transparency Directive

The Transparency Directive or Directive 2004/109/EC is an EU Directive of 2004. In 2004, it was a revision of the Directive 2001/34/EC . The Transparency Directive was amended in 2013 by the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (Directive 2013/50/EU) .

The Transparency Directive improves the harmonisation of information duties of issuers, whose securities are listed at a regulated market at a stock exchange within the European Union, and further market participants. The aims of these amendments are to establish minimum requirements regarding the financial information distribution all over the European Union and an increase in transparency at the capital markets and in investor protection to meet information deficits in a developing financial market environment.[1]

History

The Transparency Directive of 2004

The process, which resulted in the 2004 version of the EU Transparency Directive, passed several years, consultations and revisions. The first step towards the EU Transparency Directive of 2004 took place in July 2001 when the Commission of the European Union announced the first consultation regarding the transparency on publicly traded companies. This first consultation period lasted from 17 July 2001 until 30 September 2001. During that time interested parties were able to contribute comments on the proposals, which the Commission drafted in its own consultation paper, regarding the new regime on disclosure requirements. Interested parties could be the issuers themselves, national agencies and associations, state authorities and European authorities, such as CESR. The consultation paper of the Commission suggested a division of disclosure duties, in periodic and ongoing obligations.,[2] for example for financial reports (periodical) and ad hoc notifications (ongoing), and a focus on the publications of those information through a medium on a Europe-wide basis[3] as well as the control of these duties by the national supervisory authorities. Until the end of the consultation period the Commission received 90 contributions from market participants all over Europe, whereas most of the answers came from British and German interest groups. Mostly these answers complied with the suggestions, which were made up by the Commission.

However there have also been some amendments:

After the first consultation the Commission revised its consultation paper to present it to the public another time. In May 2002 the Commission launched a second and final consultation period, which lasted from 8 May 2002 until 5 July 2002. The Commission specified the information requirements regarding issuers, listed in a regulated market at a stock exchange, especially in terms of financial reporting, voting rights, directors’ dealing, stock options, employee shares schemes and equal treatment of shareholders.

In detail, those suggestions were:

These suggestions were basically confirmed by the interested parties.

On 26 May 2003 the Commission proposed its draft for the Directive to the European Parliament and to the Council of the European Union. About one year later, on 30 March 2004, the European Parliament approved the Directive, whereby the unofficial version of the Directive was published on 11 May 2004. This unofficial version covered all of the topics discussed in the former consultation process, such as periodical financial reporting, transparency in shareholder structure and publication of information.

The final version of the Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market was adopted on 17 December 2004. After the announcement of the Directive in the Official Journal of the European Union the Member State should transform the regulations, agreed on in the Directive, into national law within the next two years, not later that 20 January 2007.

The Transparency Directive Amending Directive of 2013

The Transparency Directive was amended in 2013 by the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (TDAD), Directive 2013/50/EU. The final date for member states to implement the TDAD was 26 November 2015. The TDAD contains these elements:[4]

Regulations

The Directive specifies a range of regulations which have to be transformed into national law by the Member State, whereas the Directive only sets minimum standards. Member State have the possibility to set up stricter rules.

Scope

This Directive is directed to issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market situated or operating within a Member State and regulates requirements regarding the disclosure of periodic and ongoing information.

Definitions

The Directive defines several terms, which are used in the new regulations, either by referring to other Directives or by its own definition.

Periodic information

Annual financial reports

The issuer has to publish its annual financial report not later than four months[5] after the end of the fiscal year and has to ensure that this report is accessible for at least five years. The annual financial report has to include the audited financial statements, a management report and a statement by officials that the financial statements were set up in compliance with the applicable accounting standards. In addition to the annual financial report the audit report should be published, as well.

Half-yearly financial reports

The issuer has to publish a financial report covering the first half of the fiscal year after the end of this relevant period. This report has to include the financial statements for the first half of the fiscal year, an interim management report (including major events in the first half-year, a forecast for the next half-year and their possible impacts and further financial statements) and a statement by officials that the financial statements were set up in compliance with the applicable accounting standards. In case this half-yearly report gets audited, the audit report has to be published as well.[6]

Ongoing information

Major Holdings of voting rights

A shareholder, acquiring or selling shares, has to notify the issuer of such transactions, as soon as the acquisition or disposal of shares results in an amount of voting rights, that exceeds, falls below or reaches the threshold of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% and 75%[7] of the total amount of voting rights issued.

This notification requirement can also be based on the following cases:

This notification has to include the amount of voting rights held after acquisition/disposal, the day on which the event took place, the chain of controlled undertakings or the name of the (directly invested) shareholder from which the notifying party gets attributed the voting rights. Furthermore a notification is required when a natural person or legal entity holds financial instruments, which result in the entitlement to acquire voting rights, whereas the acquisition is based on the holder's initiative. These regulations should not apply for shareholders, holding the shares as market makers, for clearing and settlement purposes and credit institutions, holding the shares in their trading book, and holding less than 10% of the total amount of voting rights issued.

Information requirements for issuers

Issuers are obliged to treat those shareholders equally, which are in the same position. Furthermore issuers have to make all available all kinds of information that are necessary for the shareholders to ensure the exercise of their rights.[8] person to exercise their voting and/or financial rights, either in paper or electronic form. After the annual general meeting the issuer has to publish decisions made at the annual general meeting, if applicable, which are: payment of dividends and issue of new shares, including allotment-, subscription-, cancellation- and conversion rights of the new shares.

General obligations

As long as shareholders or issuers have to provide information to each other, e.g. disclose the holding of voting rights, this information has to be filed with the state authority at the same time as well. The same applies for issuers, who propose the annual meeting to change their articles of incorporation.

Competent authorities and their power

Each Member State of the European Union has to designate a state authority, which should be responsible for carrying out the obligations regarding shareholders and issuers. Therefore the Member States have to empower the authorities to achieve the aims of the Directive. Especially the authorities should be able to require involved parties to provide them with information and documents regarding each single case or require the issuers and shareholder to disclose such information, which is necessary to fulfill their requirements. Additionally the authorities shall be empowered to carry out on-site inspection, to verify compliance with the statutory requirements.

References

  1. Gutzy, Jochen/Märzheuser, Michael (2007): Praxishandbuch Ad-hoc-Publizität, p. 49
  2. Hutter, Dr. Stephan/Kaulamo, Dr. Katja (2007): Das Transparenzrichtlinie-Umsetzungsgesetz: Änderungen der anlassabhängigen Publizität, in: NJW 2007, p. 471
  3. Gutzy, Jochen/Märzheuser, Michael (2007): Praxishandbuch Ad-hoc-Publizität, p. 49
  4. "Document 32013L0050: Directive 2013/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013". Europa. October 22, 2013. Retrieved 3 September 2016.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  5. Hutter, Dr. Stephan/Kaulamo, Dr. Katja (2007): Das Transparenzrichtlinie-Umsetzungsgesetz: Änderungen der Regelpublizität und das neue Veröffentlichungsregime für Kapitalmarktinformationen, in: NJW 2007, p. 551
  6. Hutter, Dr. Stephan/Kaulamo, Dr. Katja (2007): Das Transparenzrichtlinie-Umsetzungsgesetz: Änderungen der Regelpublizität und das neue Veröffentlichungsregime für Kapitalmarktinformationen, in: NJW 2007, p. 551
  7. Hutter, Dr. Stephan/Kaulamo, Dr. Katja (2007): Das Transparenzrichtlinie-Umsetzungsgesetz: Änderungen der anlassabhängigen Publizität, in: NJW 2007, p. 474
  8. Hutter, Dr. Stephan/Kaulamo, Dr. Katja (2007): Das Transparenzrichtlinie-Umsetzungsgesetz: Änderungen der anlassabhängigen Publizität, in: NJW 2007, p. 477

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/3/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.