Ramanujan tau function

The Ramanujan tau function, studied by Ramanujan (1916), is the function defined by the following identity:

where with and is the Dedekind eta function and the function is a holomorphic cusp form of weight 12 and level 1, known as the discriminant modular form. It appears in connection to an "error term" involved in counting the number of ways of expressing an integer as a sum of 24 squares. A formula due to Ian G. Macdonald was given in Dyson (1972).

Values of for n < 16,000 with logarithmic scale. The blue line picks only the values of n that are multiples of 121.

Values

The first few values of the tau function are given in the following table (sequence A000594 in the OEIS):

12345678910111213141516
1−24252−14724830−6048−1674484480−113643−115920534612−370944−5777384018561217160987136

Ramanujan's conjectures

Ramanujan (1916) observed, but did not prove, the following three properties of :

The first two properties were proved by Mordell (1917) and the third one, called the Ramanujan conjecture, was proved by Deligne in 1974 as a consequence of his proof of the Weil conjectures (specifically, he deduced it by applying them to a Kuga-Sato variety).

Congruences for the tau function

For k  Z and n  Z>0, define σk(n) as the sum of the k-th powers of the divisors of n. The tau function satisfies several congruence relations; many of them can be expressed in terms of σk(n). Here are some:[1]

  1. [2]
  2. [2]
  3. [2]
  4. [2]
  5. [3]
  6. [3]
  7. [4]
  8. [5]
  9. [5]
  10. [6]

For p  23 prime, we have[1][7]

  1. [8]

Conjectures on τ(n)

Suppose that is a weight integer newform and the Fourier coefficients are integers. Consider the problem: If does not have complex multiplication, prove that almost all primes have the property that . Indeed, most primes should have this property, and hence they are called ordinary. Despite the big advances by Deligne and Serre on Galois representations, which determine for coprime to , we do not have any clue as to how to compute . The only theorem in this regard is Elkies' famous result for modular elliptic curves, which indeed guarantees that there are infinitely many primes for which , which in turn is obviously . We do not know any examples of non-CM with weight for which mod for infinitely many primes (although it should be true for almost all ). We also do not know any examples where mod for infinitely many . Some people had begun to doubt whether indeed for infinitely many . As evidence, many provided Ramanujan's (case of weight ). The largest known for which is . The only solutions to the equation are and up to .[9]

Lehmer (1947) conjectured that for all , an assertion sometimes known as Lehmer's conjecture. Lehmer verified the conjecture for (Apostol 1997, p. 22). The following table summarizes progress on finding successively larger values of for which this condition holds for all .

N reference
3316799 Lehmer (1947)
214928639999 Lehmer (1949)
Serre (1973, p. 98), Serre (1985)
1213229187071998 Jennings (1993)
22689242781695999 Jordan and Kelly (1999)
22798241520242687999 Bosman (2007)
982149821766199295999 Zeng and Yin (2013)
816212624008487344127999 Derickx, van Hoeij, and Zeng (2013)

Notes

  1. 1 2 Page 4 of Swinnerton-Dyer 1973
  2. 1 2 3 4 Due to Kolberg 1962
  3. 1 2 Due to Ashworth 1968
  4. Due to Lahivi
  5. 1 2 Due to D. H. Lehmer
  6. Due to Ramanujan 1916
  7. Due to Wilton 1930
  8. Due to J.-P. Serre 1968, Section 4.5
  9. Due to N. Lygeros and O. Rozier 2010

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/19/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.