For other uses, see RDX (disambiguation).
IUPAC name
Other names
cyclonite, hexogen
121-82-4 YesY
3D model (Jmol) Interactive image
ChEBI CHEBI:24556 YesY
ChemSpider 8177 YesY
ECHA InfoCard 100.004.092
PubChem 8490
UN number 0072, 0391, 0483
Molar mass 222.12 g·mol−1
Appearance Colorless crystals
Density 1.82 g/cm3
Melting point 205.5 °C (401.9 °F; 478.6 K)
Boiling point 234 °C (453 °F; 507 K)
Explosive data
Shock sensitivity Low
Friction sensitivity Low
Detonation velocity 8750 m/s
RE factor 1.60
Main hazards Explosive, detonates on contact with mercury fulminate[1]
Flash point Explosive[1]
US health exposure limits (NIOSH):
PEL (Permissible)
REL (Recommended)
TWA 1.5 mg/m3 ST 3 mg/m3 [skin][1]
IDLH (Immediate danger)
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
YesY verify (what is YesYN ?)
Infobox references

RDX is the organic compound with the formula (O2NNCH2)3. It is a white solid widely used as an explosive. Chemically, it is classified as nitramide. A more powerful explosive than TNT, it was used widely in World War II. RDX is also known as Research Department Formula X.[2]

It is often used in mixtures with other explosives and plasticizers or phlegmatizers (desensitizers). RDX is stable in storage and is considered one of the most powerful and brisant of the military high explosives.[3]


RDX is also known, but less commonly, as cyclonite, hexogen (particularly in Russian, German and German-influenced languages), T4 and chemically as cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine.[4] In the 1930s, the Royal Arsenal, Woolwich, started investigating cyclonite to use against German U-boats that were being built with thicker hulls. The goal was an explosive more powerful than TNT. For security reasons, Britain termed cyclonite as "Research Department Explosive" (R.D.X.).[5] The term RDX appeared in the United States in 1946.[6] The first public reference in the United Kingdom to the name RDX, or R.D.X. to use the official title, appeared in 1948; its authors were the Managing Chemist, ROF Bridgwater, the Chemical Research and Development Department, Woolwich, and the Director of Royal Ordnance Factories, Explosives; again, it was referred to as simply RDX.[7]


Preparing to load 1,000-lb MC bombs into the bomb-bay of an Avro Lancaster B Mark III of No. 106 Squadron RAF at RAF Metheringham, prior to a major night raid on Frankfurt. The stencilled lettering around the circumference of each bomb reads "RDX/TNT"

RDX was widely used during World War II, often in explosive mixtures with TNT such as Torpex, Composition B, Cyclotols, and H6. RDX was used in one of the first plastic explosives. RDX is believed to have been used in many bomb plots including terrorist plots. The bouncing bomb depth charges used in the "Dambusters Raid" each contained 6,600 pounds (3,000 kg) of Torpex.[8]

RDX forms the base for a number of common military explosives:

Outside military applications, RDX is also used in controlled demolition to raze structures. The demolition of the Jamestown Bridge in the US state of Rhode Island was one instance where RDX shaped charges were used to remove the span.


RDX is classified by chemists as a hexahydro-1,3,5-triazine derivative. The molecule adopts with a ruffled, cyclic structure similar to that of cyclohexane. The molecule has a high nitrogen content and a high O/C ratio, both of which indicate its explosive potential for formation of N2 and CO2.

It is obtained by treating white fuming nitric acid (WFNA) with hexamine. This nitrolysis reaction produces dinitromethane and ammonium nitrate as byproducts, as described in the following idealized reactions:[11]

Hexamine + 10 nitric acid → RDX + dinitromethane + ammonium nitrate + 3 water
(CH2)6N4 + 10 HNO3 → (CH2-N-NO2)3 + 3 CH2(NO3)2 + NH4NO3 + 3 H2O

Stability and explosive properties

The velocity of detonation of RDX at a density of 1.76 g/cm3 is 8750 m/s.

It starts to decompose at about 170 °C and melts at 204 °C. At room temperature, it is very stable. It burns rather than explodes. It detonates only with a detonator, being unaffected even by small arms fire. This property makes it a useful military explosive. It is less sensitive than pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN). Under normal conditions, RDX has a figure of insensitivity of exactly 80 (RDX defines the reference point.).

RDX sublimates in vacuum, which limits some applications.

RDX when exploded in air has about 1.5 times the explosive power of TNT per unit weight and about 2.0 times per unit volume.[12][13]


RDX was used by both sides in World War II. The US produced about 15,000 long tons (15,000 t) per month during WWII and Germany about 7,000 long tons (7,100 t) per month.[14] RDX had the major advantages of possessing greater explosive power than TNT used in the First World War, and requiring no additional raw materials for its manufacture.[14]


RDX was reported in 1898 by Georg Friedrich Henning, who obtained a German patent (patent No. 104280) for its manufacture by nitrolysis of hexamine (hexamethylenetetramine) with concentrated nitric acid.[15][16] In this patent, the medical properties of RDX were mentioned; however, three further German patents obtained by Henning in 1916 proposed its use in smokeless propellants.[15] The German military started investigating its use in 1920, referring to it as hexogen.[17] Research and development findings were not published further until Edmund von Herz,[18] described as an Austrian and later a German citizen, obtained a British patent in 1921[19] and a United States patent in 1922.[20] Both patent claims were initiated in Austria; and described the manufacture of RDX by nitrating hexamethylenetetramine.[19][20] The British patent claims included the manufacture of RDX by nitration, its use with or without other explosives, and its use as a bursting charge and as an initiator.[19] The US patent claim was for the use of a hollow explosive device containing RDX and a detonator cap containing RDX.[20] In the 1930s, Germany developed improved production methods.[17]

During the Second World War, Germany used the code names W Salt, SH Salt, K-method, the E-method and the KA-method. These names represented the identities of the developers of the various chemical routes to RDX. The W-method was developed by Wolfram in 1934 and gave RDX the code name "W-Salz". It used sulfamic acid, formaldehyde, and nitric acid.[21] SH-Salz (SH salt) was from Schnurr who developed a batch-process in 1937–38 based on nitrolysis of hexamine.[22] The K-method, from Knöffler, involved addition of ammonium nitrate to the hexamine/nitric acid process.[23] The E-method, developed by Ebele, proved to be identical to the Ross and Schiessler process described below.[24] The KA-method, also developed by Knöffler, and turned out to be identical to the Bachmann process described below.[25]

The explosive shells fired by the MK 108 cannon and the warhead of the R4M rocket, both used in Luftwaffe fighter aircraft as offensive armament, both used hexogen as their explosive base.


In the United Kingdom (UK), RDX was manufactured from 1933 by the Research Department in a pilot plant at the Royal Arsenal in Woolwich, London, a larger pilot plant being built at the RGPF Waltham Abbey just outside London in 1939.[26][27] In 1939 a twin-unit industrial-scale plant was designed to be installed at a new 700 acres (280 ha) site, ROF Bridgwater, away from London; production of RDX started at Bridgwater on one unit in August 1941.[26][28] The ROF Bridgwater plant brought in ammonia and methanol as raw materials: the methanol was converted to formaldehyde and some of the ammonia converted to nitric acid, which was concentrated for RDX production.[7] The rest of the ammonia was reacted with formaldehyde to produce hexamine. The hexamine plant was supplied by Imperial Chemical Industries; it incorporated some features based on data obtained from the United States (US).[7] RDX was produced by continually adding hexamine and concentrated nitric acid to a cooled mixture of hexamine and nitric acid in the nitrator.[7] The RDX was purified and processed for its intended use; recovery and reuse of some methanol and nitric acid was also carried out.[7] The hexamine-nitration and RDX purification plants were duplicated (i.e. twin-unit) to provide some insurance against loss of production due to fire, explosion or air attack.[26]

The United Kingdom and British Empire were fighting without allies against Nazi Germany until the middle of 1941 and had to be self-sufficient. At that time (1941), the UK had the capacity to produce 70 long tons (71 t) (160,000 lb) of RDX per week; both Canada, an allied country and self-governing dominion within the British Empire, and the US were looked upon to supply ammunition and explosives, including RDX.[29] By 1942 the Royal Air Force's annual requirement was forecast to be 52,000 long tons (53,000 t) of RDX, much of which came from North America (Canada and the US).[28]


A different method of production to the Woolwich process was found and used in Canada, possibly at the McGill University Department of Chemistry. This was based on reacting paraformaldehyde and ammonium nitrate in acetic anhydride.[30] A UK patent application was made by Robert Walter Schiessler (Pennsylvania State College) and James Hamilton Ross (McGill, Canada) in May 1942; the UK patent was issued in December 1947.[31] Gilman states that the same method of production had been independently discovered by Ebele in Germany prior to Schiessler and Ross, but that this was not known by the Allies.[15][30] Urbański provides details of five methods of production, and he refers to this method as the (German) E-method.[24]

UK, US and Canadian production and development

At the beginning of the 1940s, the major US explosive manufacturers, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company and Hercules, had several decades of experience of manufacturing trinitrotoluene (TNT) and had no wish to experiment with new explosives. US Army Ordnance held the same viewpoint and wanted to continue using TNT.[32] RDX had been tested by Picatinny Arsenal in 1929 and it was regarded as too expensive and too sensitive.[29] The Navy proposed to continue using ammonium picrate.[32] In contrast, the National Defense Research Committee (NDRC), who had visited The Royal Arsenal, Woolwich, did not share the view that new explosives were unnecessary.[32] James B. Conant, chairman of Division B, wished to involve academic research into this area. Conant therefore set up an Experimental Explosives Research Laboratory at the Bureau of Mines, Bruceton, Pennsylvania, using Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) funding.[29]

Woolwich method

In 1941, the UK's Tizard Mission visited the US Army and Navy departments and part of the information handed over included details of the "Woolwich" method of manufacture of RDX and its stabilisation by mixing it with beeswax.[29] The UK was asking that the US and Canada, combined, supply 220 short tons (200 t) (440,000 lb) of RDX per day.[29] A decision was taken by William H. P. Blandy, Chief of the Bureau of Ordnance to adopt RDX for use in mines and torpedoes.[29] Given the immediate need for RDX, the US Army Ordnance, at Blandy's request, built a plant that just copied the equipment and process used at Woolwich. The result was the Wabash River Ordnance Works run by E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company.[33] At that time, this works had the largest nitric acid plant in the world.[29] The Woolwich process was expensive; it needed 11 pounds (5.0 kg) of strong nitric acid for every pound of RDX.[34]

By early 1941, the NDRC was researching new processes.[34] The Woolwich or direct nitration process has at least two serious disadvantages: (1) it used large amounts of nitric acid and (2) at least one-half of the formaldehyde is lost. One mole of hexamethylenetetramine could produce at most one mole of RDX.[35] At least three laboratories with no previous explosive experience were tasked to develop better production methods for RDX; they were based at Cornell, Michigan, and Penn State universities.[29][36] Werner Emmanuel Bachmann, from Michigan, successfully developed the "combination process" by combining the Canadian process with direct nitration.[25][29] The combination process required large quantities of acetic anhydride instead of nitric acid in the old British "Woolwich process". Ideally, the combination process could produce two moles of RDX from each mole of hexamethylenetetramine.[35]

The vast production of RDX could not continue to rely on the use of natural beeswax to desensitize the RDX. A substitute stabilizer based on petroleum was developed at the Bruceton Explosives Research Laboratory.[29]

Bachmann process

The NDRC tasked three companies to develop pilot plants. They were the Western Cartridge Company, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company and Tennessee Eastman Company, part of Eastman Kodak.[29] At the Eastman Chemical Company (TEC), a leading manufacturer of acetic anhydride, Werner Emmanuel Bachmann developed a continuous-flow process for RDX. RDX was crucial to the war effort and the current batch-production process was too slow. In February 1942, TEC began producing small amounts of RDX at its Wexler Bend pilot plant, which led to the US government authorizing TEC to design and build Holston Ordnance Works (H.O.W.) in June 1942. By April 1943, RDX was being manufactured there.[37] At the end of 1944, the Holston plant and the Wabash River Ordnance Works, which used the Woolwich process, were producing 25,000 short tons (23,000 t) (50 million pounds) of Composition B per month.[38]

The US Bachmann process for RDX was found to be richer in HMX than the United Kingdom's RDX. This later led to a RDX plant using the Bachmann process being set up at ROF Bridgwater in 1955 to produce both RDX and HMX.

Military compositions

The United Kingdom's intention in World War II was to use "desensitised" RDX. In the original Woolwich process, RDX was phlegmatized with beeswax, but later paraffin wax was used, based on the work carried out at Bruceton. In the event the UK was unable to obtain sufficient RDX to meet its needs, some of the shortfall was met by substituting amatol, a mixture of ammonium nitrate and TNT.[28]

Karl Dönitz was reputed to have claimed that "an aircraft can no more kill a U-boat than a crow can kill a mole".[39] However, by May 1942 Wellington bombers began to deploy depth charges containing Torpex, a mixture of RDX, TNT and aluminium, which had up to 50 percent more destructive power than TNT-filled depth charges.[39] Considerable quantities of the RDX–TNT mixture were produced at the Holston Ordnance Works, with Tennessee Eastman developing an automated mixing and cooling process based around the use of stainless steel conveyor belts.[13]


The 1993 Bombay bombings used RDX placed into several vehicles as bombs. RDX was the main component used for the 2006 Mumbai train bombings and the Jaipur bombings in 2008.[40][41] It is also believed to be the explosive used in the 1999 Russian apartment bombings,[42] 2004 Russian aircraft bombings,[43] and 2010 Moscow Metro bombings.[44]

Ahmed Ressam, the al-Qaeda Millennium Bomber, used a small quantity of RDX as one of the components in the explosives that he prepared to bomb Los Angeles International Airport on New Year's Eve 1999/2000; the combined explosives could have produced a blast forty times greater than that of a devastating car bomb.[45][46]

In July 2012, the Kenyan government arrested two Iranian nationals and charged them with illegal possession of 15 kilograms (33 pounds) of RDX. According to the Kenyan Police, the Iranians planned to use the RDX for "attacks on Israeli, US, UK and Saudi Arabian targets".[47]

RDX was used to assassinate Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Hariri on February 14, 2005.[48]


RDX undergoes a detonation to deflagration transition (DDT) in confinement and certain circumstances.[49]


RDX has caused convulsions (seizures) in military field personnel ingesting it, and in munition workers inhaling its dust during manufacture. The substance's toxicity has been studied for many years.[50] At least one fatality was attributed to RDX toxicity in a European munitions manufacturing plant.[51] The substance has low to moderate toxicity with a possible human carcinogen classification.[52] However, further research is ongoing and this classification may be revised by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).[53][54] Remediating RDX contaminated water supplies has proven to be successful.[55]


RDX is degraded by the organisms in sewage sludge as well as the fungus Phanaerocheate chrysosporium.[56] Both wild and transgenic plants can phytoremediate explosives from soil and water.[57]


  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards #0169". National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
  2. The National Archives, London, DEFE 15/2406 dated September 1942, refers to this material as Research Department Formula X. Their original file reference was Explosives Report 275/2. The Research Department at Woolwich Arsenal named it thus as they invented the substance.
  3. 1 2 Department of the Army Technical Manual TM 9-1300-214: Military Explosives. Headquarters, Department of the Army (United States).
  4. Davis, Tenney L. (1943), The Chemistry of Powder and Explosives, II, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., p. 396
  5. MacDonald and Mack Partnership (1984, p. 18)
  6. Baxter III 1968, pp. 27, 42, 255–259
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Simmons, W.H.; Forster, A.; Bowden, R. C. (August 1948), "The Manufacture of R.D.X. in Great Britain: Part II – Raw Materials and Ancillary Processes", The Industrial Chemist, 24: 530–545; Simmons, W.H.; Forster, A.; Bowden, R. C. (September 1948), "The Manufacture of R.D.X. in Great Britain: Part III – Production of the Explosive", The Industrial Chemist, 24: 593–601
  8. Sweetman, John (2002) The Dambusters Raid. London: Cassell Military Paperbacks. p. 144.
  9. Hampton, L. D. (June 15, 1960), The Development of RDX Composition CH-6 (PDF), White Oak, MD: U. S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory, NavOrd Report 680
  10. US Explosive Ordnance; Ordnance Pamphlet OP 1664. 1. Washington, D.C.: Navy Department, Bureau of Ordnance. May 28, 1947. pp. 3–4. OP 1664 states 21% "aluminum nitrate", but the immediately following text refers to ammonium nitrate.
  11. Luo, K.-M.; Lin, S.-H.; Chang, J.-G.; Huang, T.-H. (2002), "Evaluations of kinetic parameters and critical runaway conditions in the reaction system of hexamine-nitric acid to produce RDX in a non-isothermal batch reactor", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15 (2): 119–127, doi:10.1016/S0950-4230(01)00027-4.
  12. Elderfield (1960, p. 8)
  13. 1 2 Baxter III (1968, pp. 257 & 259)
  14. 1 2 Urbański (1967, p. 78)
  15. 1 2 3 Urbański (1967, pp. 77–119)
  16. DE 104280, Henning, Georg Friedrich, issued June 14, 1899
  17. 1 2 Hexogen. economypoint.org, citing Gartz, Jochen (2007), Vom griechischen Feuer zum Dynamit: eine Kulturgeschichte der Explosivstoffe [From Greek fire to dynamite: A cultural history of explosives] (in German), Hamburg: E. S. Mittler & Sohn, ISBN 978-3-8132-0867-2
  18. Urbański (1967, p. 125) credits "G. C. V. Herz" for the patent, but the patentee is Edmund von Herz.
  19. 1 2 3 GB 145791, von Herz, Edmund, "Improvements relating to Explosives", issued March 17, 1921
  20. 1 2 3 US 1402693, von Herz, Edmund, "Explosive", issued January 3, 1922
  21. Urbański (1967, pp. 107–109)
  22. Urbański (1967, pp. 104–105)
  23. Urbański (1967, pp. 105–107)
  24. 1 2 Urbański (1967, pp. 109–110)
  25. 1 2 Urbański (1967, pp. 111–113)
  26. 1 2 3 Cocroft, Wayne D. (2000), Dangerous Energy: The archaeology of gunpowder and military explosives manufacture, Swindon: English Heritage, pp. 210–211, ISBN 1-85074-718-0
  27. Akhavan, Jacqueline (2004), The Chemistry of Explosives, Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry, ISBN 0-85404-640-2
  28. 1 2 3 Hornby, William (1958), Factories and Plant, History of the Second World War: United Kingdom Civil Series, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; Longmans, Green and Co., pp. 112–114
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Baxter III (1968, pp. 253–239)
  30. 1 2 Gilman, Henry (1953), "The Chemistry of Explosives", Organic Chemistry an Advanced Treatise, III, Wiley; Chapman & Hall, p. 985
  31. GB 595354, Schiessler, Robert Walter & James Hamilton Ross, "Method of Preparing 1.3.5. Trinitro Hexahydro S-Triazine", issued December 3, 1947
  32. 1 2 3 Baxter III (1968, pp. 253–254)
  33. MacDonald and Mack Partnership (1984, p. 19)
  34. 1 2 MacDonald and Mack Partnership (1984, p. 13) These pages need to be checked. Page 13 may actually be page 18.
  35. 1 2 Elderfield (1960, p. 6)
  36. These were not the only laboratories to work on RDX, Gilman's 1953 account of the Ross-Schiessler method was based on unpublished work from laboratories at the Universities of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Cornell, Harvard, Vanderbilt, McGill (Canada), Bristol (UK), Sheffield (UK), Pennsylvania State College and the UK's Research Department.
  37. Bachmann, W. E.; Sheehan, John C. (1949), "A New Method of Preparing the High Explosive RDX", Journal of the American Chemical Society, 71 (5): 1842–1845, doi:10.1021/ja01173a092
  38. MacDonald and Mack Partnership (1984, p. 32)
  39. 1 2 Baxter III (1968), p. 42
  40. Singh, Anil (October 2, 2006). "Mumbai". The Times of India.
  41. "Jaipur blasts: RDX used, HuJI suspected". Times of India. May 14, 2008. Retrieved May 13, 2011.
  42. "Debate on Cause of Moscow Blast Heats Up". New York Times. September 10, 1999. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  43. "Explosive Suggests Terrorists Downed Plane, Russia Says". New York Times. August 28, 2004. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  44. "Moscow Metro bombing masterminds 'will be destroyed'". BBC News. March 29, 2010. Retrieved April 2, 2010.
  45. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (February 2, 2010). "U.S. v. Ressam" (PDF). Retrieved February 27, 2010.
  46. "Complaint; U.S. v. Ressam" (PDF). NEFA Foundation. December 1999. Retrieved February 26, 2010.
  47. "Iranian agents in Kenya planned attacks on Israel, US, UK, Saudi Arabian targets". Washington Post. July 2, 2012. Retrieved July 2, 2012.
  48. Ronen Bergman (February 10, 2015). "The Hezbollah Connection". New York Times. Retrieved February 16, 2015.
  49. Price, D., Bernecker, R. (1977). "DDT Behavior of Waxed Mixtures of RDX, HMX, and Tetryl" (PDF). Naval Surface Weapons Center.
  50. Annotated Reference Outline for the Toxicological Review of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (November 23, 2010)
  51. Schneider, N. R.; Bradley, S. L.; Andersen, M. E. (July 1976), Toxicology of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX): Distribution and metabolism in the rat and the miniature swine, Scientific Report, DTIC, SR76-34; also in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 39(3) March 1977, doi:10.1016/0041-008X(77)90144-2
  52. Faust, Rosmarie A. (December 1994) Toxicity summary for hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX). Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  53. Muhly, Robert L. (December 2001) Update on the Reevaluation of the Carcinogenic Potential of RDX. U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (CHPPM) "white paper"
  54. "Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) (CASRN 121-82-4)". epa.gov. Retrieved January 1, 2014.
  55. Newell, Charles (August 2008). Treatment of RDX & HMX Plumes Using Mulch Biowalls. GSI Environmental, Inc.
  56. Hawari, J.; Beaudet, S.; Halasz, A.; Thiboutot, S.; Ampleman, G. (2000). "Microbial degradation of explosives: biotransformation versus mineralization". Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 54 (5): 605–618. doi:10.1007/s002530000445. PMID 11131384.
  57. Panz, K.; Miksch, K. (December 2012). "Phytoremediation of explosives (TNT, RDX, HMX) by wild-type and transgenic plants". Journal of Environmental Management. 113: 85–92. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.016. PMID 22996005.


Further reading

  • Agrawal, Jai Prakhash.; Hodgson, Robert Dale (2007), Organic Chemistry of Explosives, Wiley, ISBN 978-0-470-02967-1 
  • US 2680671, Bachmann, Werner E., "Method of Treating Cyclonite Mixtures", published July 16, 1943, issued June 8, 1954 
  • US 2798870, Bachmann, Werner E., "Method for Preparing Explosives", published July 16, 1943, issued July 9, 1957 
  • Cooper, Paul W. (1996), Explosives Engineering, New York: Wiley-VCH, ISBN 0-471-18636-8 
  • Hale, George C. (1925), "The Nitration of Hexamethylenetetramine", Journal of the American Chemical Society, 47 (11): 2754–2763, doi:10.1021/ja01688a017 
  • Meyer, Rudolf (1987), Explosives (3rd ed.), VCH Publishers, ISBN 0-89573-600-4 
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/2/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.