Food irradiation

Cobalt-60 irradiation facility is used to test irradiation as a tool to ensure food safety.
The international Radura logo, used to show a food has been treated with ionizing radiation.
A portable, trailer-mounted food irradiation machine, circa 1968

Food irradiation is the process of exposing foodstuffs to ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is energy that can be transmitted without direct contact (radiation) capable of freeing electrons from their atomic bonds (ionization) in the targeted food.[1][1][2] This treatment is used to preserve food, reduce the risk of food borne illness, prevent the spread of invasive pests, and delay or eliminate sprouting or ripening. Irradiated food does not become radioactive. The radiation can be emitted by a radioactive substance or generated electrically.

Irradiation is also used for non-food applications, such as medical devices.[3]

Although consumer perception of foods treated with irradiation is more negative than those processed by other means,[4] a large amount of independent research has confirmed irradiation to be safe.[5][6][7][8][9] One family of chemicals is uniquely formed by irradiation, and this product is nontoxic. When irradiating food, all other chemicals occur in a lower or comparable frequency to other food processing techniques.[6][7][10][11]

Food irradiation is permitted by over 60 countries, with about 500,000 metric tons of food annually processed worldwide.[12] The regulations that dictate how food is to be irradiated, as well as the food allowed to be irradiated, vary greatly from country to country. In Austria, Germany, and many other countries of the European Union only dried herbs, spices, and seasonings can be processed with irradiation and only at a specific dose, while in Brazil all foods are allowed at any dose.[13][14][15][16][17]


Irradiation is used to reduce or eliminate the risk of food born illnesses. Depending on the dose, some or all of the pathogenic organisms, microorganisms, bacteria, and viruses present are destroyed, slowed down, or rendered incapable of reproduction. Some foods are irradiated at sufficient doses to ensure that the product is sterilized and does not add any spoilage or pathogenic microorganisms into the final product.[1]

Irradiation is used reduce post harvest losses. It reduces the pathogens in the food and slows down the speed at which enzymes produced by the food can change the food and therefore slows the spoilage, ripening, and or sprouting of the food.[18]

Irradiation cannot revert spoiled or over ripened food to a fresh state. If this food was processed by irradiation, spoilage would cease and ripening would slow down, yet the irradiation would not destroy the toxins or repair the texture, color, or taste of the food.[18]

Food is irradiated to prevent the spread of foreign invasive species across national boundaries. The pests are sterilized or destroyed when the food is treated by low doses of irradiation. This also allows food to pass quickly through quarantine and avoid spoilage.[19]

Public perception

Irradiation has been approved by the FDA for over 50 years, but the only major growth area for the commercial sale of irradiated foods for human consumption is fruits and vegetables that are irradiated to kill insects for the purpose of quarantine. In the early 2000s in the US, irradiated meat was common at some grocery stores, but because of lack of consumer demand it is no longer common. Because consumer demand for irradiated food is low, reducing the spoilage between manufacture and consumer purchase and reducing the risk of food borne illness is currently not sufficient incentive for most manufactures to supplement their process with irradiation.[3]

It is widely believed that consumer perception of foods treated with irradiation is more negative than those processed by other means,[4] although some industry studies indicate the number of consumers concerned about the safety of irradiated food has decreased in the last 10 years to levels comparable to those of people concerned about food additives and preservatives.[20] “These irradiated foods are not less safe than others,” Dr. Tarantino said, “and the doses are effective in reducing the level of disease-causing micro-organisms.” "People think the product is radioactive," said Harlan Clemmons, president of Sadex, a food irradiation company based in Sioux City, Iowa.[21] Because of these concerns and the increased cost of irradiated foods, there is not a widespread public demand for the irradiation of foods for human consumption.[3]


Irradiation reduces the risk of infection and spoilage, does not make food radioactive, and the food is shown to be safe, but it does cause chemical reactions that alter the food and therefore alters the chemical makeup, nutritional content, and the sensory qualities of the food.[3] Some of the potential secondary impacts of irradiation are hypothetical, while others are demonstrated. These effects include cumulative impacts to pathogens, people, and the environment due to the reduction of food quality, the transpiration and storage of radioactive goods, and destruction of pathogens, changes in the way we relate to food and how irradiation changes the food production and shipping industries.

Immediate effects

The radiation source supplies energetic particles or waves. As these waves/particles pass through a target material they collide with other particles. Around the sites of these collisions chemical bonds are broken, creating short lived radicals (e.g. the hydroxyl radical, the hydrogen atom and solvated electrons). These radicals cause further chemical changes by bonding with and or stripping particles from nearby molecules. When collisions damage DNA or RNA, effective reproduction becomes unlikely, also when collisions occur in cells, cell division is often suppressed.[1]

Irradiation (within the accepted energy limits, as 10 MeV for electrons, 5 MeV for X-rays [US 7.5 MeV] and gamma rays from Cobalt-60) can not make food radioactive, but it does produce radiolytic products, and free radicals in the food. A few of these products are unique, but not considered dangerous.[22]

Irradiation can also alter the nutritional content and flavor of foods, much like cooking.[22] The scale of these chemical changes is not unique. Cooking, smoking, salting, and other less novel techniques, cause the food to be altered so drastically that its original nature is almost unrecognizable, and must be called by a different name. Storage of food also causes dramatic chemical changes, ones that eventually lead to deterioration and spoilage.[23]


A major concern is that irradiation might cause chemical changes that are harmful to the consumer. Several national expert groups and two international expert groups evaluated the available data and concluded that any food at any dose is wholesome and safe to consume as long as it remains palatable and maintains its technical properties (e.g. feel, texture, or color).[6][7]

Irradiated food does not become radioactive, just as an object exposed to light does not start producing light. Radioactivity is the ability of a substance to emit high energy particles. When particles hit the target materials they may free other highly energetic particles. This ends shortly after the end of the exposure, much like objects stop reflecting light when the source is turned off and warm objects emit heat until they cool down but do not continue to produce their own heat. To modify a material so that it keeps emitting radiation (induce radiation) the atomic cores (nucleus) of the atoms in the target material must be modified.

It is impossible for food irradiators to induce radiation into a product. Irradiators emit electrons or photons and the radiation is intrinsically radiated at precisely known strengths (wavelengths for photons, and speeds for electrons). These radiated particles at these strengths can never be strong enough to modify the nucleus of the targeted atom in the food, regardless of how many particles hit the target material, and radioactivity can not be induced without modifying the nucleus.[22]

Chemical changes

Compounds known as free radicals form when food is irradiated. Most of these are oxidizers (i.e., accept electrons) and some react very strongly. According to the free-radical theory of aging excessive amounts of these free radicals can lead to cell injury and cell death, which may contribute to many diseases.[24] However, this generally relates to the free radicals generated in the body, not the free radicals consumed by the individual, as much of these are destroyed in the digestive process.

When fatty acids are irradiated, a family of compounds called 2-alkylcyclobutanones (2-ACBs) are produced. These are thought to be unique radiolytic products. Most of the substances found in irradiated food are also found in food that has been subjected to other food processing treatments, and are therefore not unique. Furthermore, the quantities in which they occur in irradiated food are lower or similar to the quantities formed in heat treatments.[6][7][10][11]

The radiation doses to cause toxic changes are much higher than the doses used to during irradiation, and taking into account the presence of 2-ACBs along with what is known of free radicals, these results lead to the conclusion that there is no significant risk from radiolytic products.[5]

Food quality

Because of the extent of the chemical reactions, changes to the food's quality after irradiation are inevitable. The nutritional contents, as well as the sensory qualities (taste, appearance, and texture) are impacted by irradiation. Irradiation changes the sensory qualities and reduces the content of some nutrients in foods. Irradiation also improves the shelf stability of some sensory qualities and nutrients. For these components more of the original taste, texture, appearance, and nutrients get to the final consumer.[25][26][27] The changes in quality and nutrition vary greatly from food to food.[18]

There has been low level gamma irradiation that has been attempted on arugula,[28] spinach,[29] cauliflower,[30] ash gourd,[31] bamboo shoots,[32] coriander, parsley, and watercress.[33] There has been limited information, however, regarding the physical, chemical and/or bioactive properties and the shelf life on these minimally processed vegetables.[27]

Because the nutritional content changes after irradiation food advocacy groups consider labeling irradiated food raw as misleading.[34] However, the degradation of vitamins caused by irradiation is similar or even less than the loss caused by other food preservation processes. Other processes like chilling, freezing, drying, and heating also result in some vitamin loss.[18]

The changes in the flavor of fatty foods like meats, nuts and oils are sometimes noticeable, while the changes in lean products like fruits and vegetables are less so. Some studies by the irradiation industry show that for some properly treated fruits and vegetables irradiation is seen by consumers to improve the sensory qualities of the product compared to untreated fruits and vegetables.[18]

Quality Impact on Minimally Processed Vegetables

Watercress (Nasturtium Officinale) is a rapidly growing aquatic or semi aquatic perennial plant. It contains health promoting phytochemicals endowed in therapeutic properties.[35] Because chemical agents do not provide efficient microbial reductions, watercress has been tested with gamma irradiation treatment in order to improve both safety and the shelf life of the product.[36] It is traditionally used on horticultural products to prevent sprouting and post-packaging contamination, delay post-harvest ripening, maturation and senescence.[27]

In a Food Chemistry food journal, scientists studied the suitability of gamma irradiation of 1, 2, and 5 kGy for preserving quality parameters of the fresh cut watercress at around 4 degrees Celsius for 7 days. They determined that a 2 kGy dose of irradiation was the dose that contained most similar qualities to non-stored control samples, which is one of the goals of irradiation.[25] 2 kGy preserved high levels of reducing sugars and favoured PUFA; while samples of the 5 kGy dose revealed high contents of sucrose and MUFA. Both cases the watercress samples obtained healthier fatty acids profiles.[26] However, a 5kGy dose better preserved the antioxidant activity and total flavonoids.[27]

Long term impacts

If the majority of food was irradiated at high-enough levels to significantly decrease its nutritional content, there would be an increased risk to develop illnesses that are nutritionally-based if additional steps, such as changes in eating habits, were not taken to mitigate this.[37] Furthermore, for at least three studies on cats, the consumption of irradiated food was associated with a loss of tissue in the myelin sheath, leading to reversible paralysis. Researchers suspect that reduced levels of vitamin A and high levels of free radicals may be the cause.[38] This effect is thought to be specific to cats and has not been reproduced in any other animal. To produce these effects, the cats were fed solely on food that was irradiated at a dose at least five times higher than the maximum allowable dose.[38]

It may seem reasonable to assume that irradiating food might lead to radiation-tolerant strains, similar to the way that strains of bacteria have developed resistance to antibiotics. Bacteria develop a resistance to antibiotics after an individual uses antibiotics repeatedly. Much like pasteurization plants, products that pass through irradiation plants are processed once, and are not processed and reprocessed. Cycles of heat treatment have been shown to produce heat-tolerant bacteria, yet no problems have appeared so far in pasteurization plants. Furthermore, when the irradiation dose is chosen to target a specific species of microbe, it is calibrated to doses several times the value required to target the species. This ensures that the process randomly destroys all members of a target species.[39] Therefore, the more irradiation-tolerant members of the target species are not given any evolutionary advantage. Without evolutionary advantage, selection does not occur. As to the irradiation process directly producing mutations that lead to more virulent, radiation-resistant strains, the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Food found that there is no evidence; on the contrary, irradiation has been found to cause loss of virulence and infectivity, as mutants are usually less competitive and less adapted.[40]


The argument is made that there is a lack of long-term studies and, therefore, the safety of irradiated food is not scientifically proven,[41] in spite of the fact that hundreds of animal feeding studies of irradiated food, including multigenerational studies, have been performed since 1950.[5] Endpoints investigated have included subchronic and chronic changes in metabolism, histopathology, function of most systems, reproductive effects, growth, teratogenicity, and mutagenicity. A large number of studies have been performed; meta-studies have supported the safety of irradiated food.[5][6][7][8][9]

The below experiments are cited by food irradiation opponents, but either could not be verified in later experiments, could not be clearly attributed to the radiation effect, or could be attributed to an inappropriate design of the experiment.[5][18]

Indirect effects of irradiation

The indirect effects of irradiation are the concerns and benefits of irradiation that are related to how making food irradiation a common process will change the world, with emphasis on the system of food production.

If irradiation was to become common in the food handling process there would be a reduction of the prevalence of foodborne illness and potentially the eradication of specific pathogens.[42] However, multiple studies suggest that an increased rate of pathogen growth may occur when irradiated food is cross-contaminated with a pathogen, as the competing spoilage organisms are no longer present.[43] This being said, cross contamination itself becomes less prevalent with an increase in usage of irradiated foods.[44]

The ability to remove bacterial contamination through post-processing by irradiation may reduce the fear of mishandling food which could cultivate a cavalier attitude toward hygiene and result in contaminants other than bacteria. However, concerns that the pasteurization of milk would lead to increased contamination of milk were prevalent when mandatory pasteurization was introduced, but these fears never materialized after adoption of this law. Therefore, it is unlikely for irradiation to cause an increase of illness due to nonbacteria-based contamination.[45]


Up to the point where the food is processed by irradiation, the food is processed in the same way as all other food. To treat the food, they are exposed to a radioactive source, for a set period of time to achieve a desired dose. Radiation may be emitted by a radioactive substance, or by X-ray and electron beam accelerators. Special precautions are taken to ensure the food stuffs never come in contact with the radioactive substances and that the personnel and the environment are protected from exposure radiation.[46] Irradiation treatments are typically classified by dose (high, medium, and low), but are sometimes classified by the effects of the treatment[47] (radappertization, radicidation and radurization). Food irradiation is sometimes referred to as "cold pasteurization"[48] or "electronic pasteurization"[49] because ionizing the food does not heat the food to high temperatures during the process, and the effect is similar to heat pasteurization. The term "cold pasteurization" is controversial because the term may be used to disguise the fact the food has been irradiated and pasteurization and irradiation are fundamentally different processes.

Treatment costs vary as a function of dose and facility usage. A pallet or tote is typically exposed for several minutes to hours depending on dose. Low-dose applications such as disinfestation of fruit range between US$0.01/lbs and US$0.08/lbs while higher-dose applications can cost as much as US$0.20/lbs.[50]


Typically, when the food is being irradiated, pallets of food are exposed to a source of radiation for a specific time. Dosimeters are embedded in the pallet (at various locations) of food to determine what dose was achieved.[46] Most irradiated food is processed by gamma irradiation.,[51] however the usage of electron beam and X-ray is becoming more popular as well . Special precautions are taken because gamma rays are continuously emitted by the radioactive material. In most designs, to nullify the effects of radiation, the radioisotope is lowered into a water-filled storage pool, which absorbs the radiation but does not become radioactive. This allows pallets of the products to be added and removed from the irradiation chamber and other maintenance to be done.[46] Sometimes movable shields are used to reduce radiation levels in areas of the irradiation chamber instead of submerging the source. For x ray and electron irradiation these precautions are not necessary as the source of the radiation can be switched off.[46]

For x-ray, gamma ray and electron irradiation, shielding is required when the foods are being irradiated. This is done to protect workers and the environment outside of the chamber from radiation exposure. Typically permanent or movable shields are used.[46] In some gamma irradiators the radioactive source is under water at all times, and the hermetically sealed product is lowered into the water. The water acts as the shield in this application. Because of the lower penetration depth of electron irradiation, treatment to entire industrial pallets or totes is not possible.


The radiation absorbed dose is the amount energy absorbed per unit weight of the target material. Dose is used because, when the same substance is given the same dose, similar changes are observed in the target material. The SI unit for dose is grays (Gy or J/kg). Dosimeters are used to measure dose, and are small components that, when exposed to ionizing radiation, change measurable physical attributes to a degree that can be correlated to the dose received. Measuring dose (dosimetry) involves exposing one or more dosimeters along with the target material.[52][53]

For purposes of legislation doses are divided into low (up to 1 kGy), medium (1 kGy to 10 kGy), and high-dose applications (above 10 kGy). High-dose applications are above those currently permitted in the US for commercial food items by the FDA and other regulators around the world.[54] Though these doses are approved for non commercial applications, such as sterilizing frozen meat for NASA astronauts (doses of 44 kGy)[55] and food for hospital patients.

Applications By Overall Average Dose
Application Dose (kGy)
Low dose (up to 1 kGy) Inhibit sprouting[lower-alpha 1] 0.03-0.15 kGy
Delay fruit ripening 0.03-0.15 kGy
Stop insect/parasite infestations[lower-alpha 2] 0.07-1.00 kGy
Medium dose (1 kGy to 10 kGy) Delay spoilage of meat[lower-alpha 3] 1.50–3.00 kGy
Reduce risk of pathogens in meat[lower-alpha 3] 3.00–7.00 kGy
Increase sanitation[lower-alpha 4] of spices[56] 10.00 kGy
High dose (above 10 kGy) Sterilization[lower-alpha 5] of packaged meat[lower-alpha 3] 25.00-70.00 kGy
Increase juice yield
Improve re-hydration


Efficiency illustration of the different radiation technologies (electron beam, X-ray, gamma rays)

Electron irradiation uses electrons accelerated in an electric field to a velocity close to the speed of light. Electrons have a charge, and therefore do not penetrate the product beyond a few centimeters, depending on product density.

Gamma irradiation involves exposing the target material to packets of light (photons) that are highly energetic (Gamma rays). A radioactive material (radioisotopes) is used as the source for the gamma rays.[51] Gamma irradiation is the standard because the deeper penetration of the gamma rays enables administering treatment to entire industrial pallets or totes (reducing the need for material handling) and it is significantly less expensive than using an X-ray source. Generally cobalt-60 is used as a radioactive source for gamma irradiation. Cobalt-60 is bred from cobalt-59 using neutron irradiation in specifically designed nuclear reactors.[51] In limited applications caesium-137, a less costly alternative recovered during the processing of spent nuclear fuel, is used as a radioactive source. Insufficient quantities are available for large scale commercial use. An incident where water-soluble caesium-137 leaked into the source storage pool requiring NRC intervention[57] has led to near elimination of this radioisotope outside of military applications.

Irradiation by X-ray is similar to irradiation by gamma rays in that less energetic packets of light (X-rays) are used. X-rays are generated by colliding accelerated electrons with a dense material (this process is known as bremsstrahlung-conversion), and therefore do not necessitate the use of radioactive materials.[58] X-rays ability to penetrate the target is similar to gamma irradiation. X-ray machines produce better dose uniformity than Gamma irradiation but require much more electricity as only as much as 12% of the input energy is converted into X-rays.[51]


The cost of food irradiation is influenced by dose requirements, the food's tolerance of radiation, handling conditions, i.e., packaging and stacking requirements, construction costs, financing arrangements, and other variables particular to the situation.[59] Irradiation is a capital-intensive technology requiring a substantial initial investment, ranging from $1 million to $5 million. In the case of large research or contract irradiation facilities, major capital costs include a radiation source, hardware (irradiator, totes and conveyors, control systems, and other auxiliary equipment), land (1 to 1.5 acres), radiation shield, and warehouse. Operating costs include salaries (for fixed and variable labor), utilities, maintenance, taxes/insurance, cobalt-60 replenishment, general utilities, and miscellaneous operating costs.[50][60]

Standards & regulations

The Codex Alimentarius represents the global standard for irradiation of food, in particular under the WTO-agreement. Member states are free to convert those standards into national regulations at their discretion, therefore regulations about irradiation differ from country to country.

The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) has passed a motion to commit member states to implement irradiation technology for their national phytosanitary programs; the General assembly of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has urged wider use of the irradiation technology.


The Radura symbol, as required by U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations to show a food has been treated with ionizing radiation.

The provisions of the Codex Alimentarius are that any "first generation" product must be labeled "irradiated" as any product derived directly from an irradiated raw material; for ingredients the provision is that even the last molecule of an irradiated ingredient must be listed with the ingredients even in cases where the unirradiated ingredient does not appear on the label. The RADURA-logo is optional; several countries use a graphical version that differs from the Codex-version. The suggested rules for labeling is published at CODEX-STAN – 1 (2005),[61] and includes the usage of the Radura symbol for all products that contain irradiated foods. The Radura symbol is not a designator of quality. The amount of pathogens remaining is based upon dose and the original content and the dose applied can vary on a product by product basis.

The European Union follows the Codex's provision to label irradiated ingredients down to the last molecule of irradiated food. The European Community does not provide for the use of the Radura logo and relies exclusively on labeling by the appropriate phrases in the respective languages of the Member States. The European Union enforces its irradiation labeling laws by requiring its member countries to perform tests on a cross section of food items in the market-place and to report to the European Commission. The results are published annually in the OJ of the European Communities.[62]

The US defines irradiated foods as foods in which the irradiation causes a material change in the food, or a material change in the consequences that may result from the use of the food. Therefore, food that is processed as an ingredient by a restaurant or food processor is exempt from the labeling requirement in the US. This definition is not consistent with the Codex Alimentarius. All irradiated foods must bear a slightly modified[61] Radura symbol at the point of sale and use the term "irradiated" or a derivative there of, in conjunction with explicit language describing the change in the food or its conditions of use.[63]

Food safety

In 2003, the Codex Alimentarius removed any upper dose limit for food irradiation as well as clearances for specific foods, declaring that all are safe to irradiate. Countries such as Pakistan and Brazil have adopted the Codex without any reservation or restriction. Other countries, including New Zealand, Australia, Thailand, India, and Mexico, have permitted the irradiation of fresh fruits for fruit fly quarantine purposes, amongst others.

Standards that describe calibration and operation for radiation dosimetry, as well as procedures to relate the measured dose to the effects achieved and to report and document such results, are maintained by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM international) and are also available as ISO/ASTM standards.[64]

All of the rules involved in processing food are applied to all foods before they are irradiated.

United States

In the United States, each new food is approved separately with a guideline specifying a maximum dosage; in case of quarantine applications the minimum dose is regulated. Packaging materials containing the food processed by irradiation must also undergo approval. Food irradiation in the United States is primarily regulated by the FDA[65] since it is considered a food additive. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) amends these rules for use with meat, poultry, and fresh fruit.[66]

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has approved the use of low-level irradiation as an alternative treatment to pesticides for fruits and vegetables that are considered hosts to a number of insect pests, including fruit flies and seed weevils. Under bilateral agreements that allows less-developed countries to earn income through food exports agreements are made to allow them to irradiate fruits and vegetables at low doses to kill insects, so that the food can avoid quarantine.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the USDA have approved irradiation of the following foods and purposes:

European Union

European law dictates that no foods other than dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings are permitted for the application of irradiation.[71] However, any Member State is permitted to maintain previous clearances that are in categories that the EC's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) had previously approved, or add clearance granted to other Member States. Presently, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom have adopted such provisions.[72] Before individual items in an approved class can be added to the approved list, studies into the toxicology of each of such food and for each of the proposed dose ranges are requested. It also states that irradiation shall not be used "as a substitute for hygiene or health practices or good manufacturing or agricultural practice". These regulations only govern food irradiation in consumer products to allow irradiation to be used for patients requiring sterile diets.

Because of the Single Market of the EC any food, even if irradiated, must be allowed to be marketed in any other Member State even if a general ban of food irradiation prevails, under the condition that the food has been irradiated legally in the state of origin. Furthermore, imports into the EC are possible from third countries if the irradiation facility had been inspected and approved by the EC and the treatment is legal within the EC or some Member state.[73][74][75][76][77]


Australia banned irradiated cat food after a national scare where cats suffered from paralyzation after eating a specific brand of highly irradiated catfood for an extended period of time. The suspected culprit was malnutrition from consuming food depleted of Vitamin A by the irradiation process.[78][79] The incident was linked only to a single batch of one brand's product and no illness was linked to any of that brand's other irradiated batches of the same product or to any other brand of irradiated cat food. This, along with incomplete evidence indicating that the cat food was not sufficiently depleted of Vitamin A[80] makes irradiation a less likely cause.[81] Further research has been able to experimentally induce the paralyzation of cats by via Vitamin A deficiency by feeding highly irradiated food.[38] For more details see the cumulative impacts of irradiation section.

Nuclear safety & security

Interlocks and safeguards are mandated to minimize this risk. There have been radiation related accidents, deaths, and injury at such facilities, many of them caused by operators overriding the safety related interlocks.[82] In a radiation processing facility, radiation specific concerns are supervised by special authorities, while "Ordinary" occupational safety regulations are handled much like other businesses.

The safety of irradiation facilities is regulated by the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency and monitored by the different national Nuclear Regulatory Commissions. The regulators enforce a safety culture that mandates that all incidents that occur are documented and thoroughly analyzed to determine the cause and improvement potential. Such incidents are studied by personnel at multiple facilities, and improvements are mandated to retrofit existing facilities and future design.

In the US the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates the safety of the processing facility, and the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) regulates the safe transport of the radioactive sources.

Irradiated food supply

Authorities in some countries use tests that can detect the irradiation of food items to enforce labeling standards and to bolster consumer confidence.[83][84][85] The European Union monitors the market to determine the quantity of irradiated foods, if irradiated foods are labeled as irradiated, and if the irradiation is performed at approved facilities.

Irradiation of fruits and vegetables to prevent the spread of pest and diseases across borders has been increasing globally. In 2010, 18446 tonnes of fruits and vegetables were irradiated in six countries for export quarantine control; the countries follow: Mexico (56.2%), United States (31.2%), Thailand (5.18%), Vietnam (4.63%), Australia (2.69%), and India (0.05%). The three types of fruits irradiated the most were guava (49.7%), sweet potato(29.3%) and sweet lime (3.27%).[86]

In total, 103 000 tonnes of food products were irradiated on mainland United States in 2010. The three types of foods irradiated the most were spices (77.7%), fruits and vegetables (14.6%) and meat and poultry (7.77%). 17 953 tonnes of irradiated fruits and vegetables were exported to the mainland United States.[86] Mexico, the United States' state of Hawaii, Thailand, Vietnam and India export irradiated produce to the mainland U.S.[86][87][88] Mexico, followed by the United States' state of Hawaii, is the largest exporter of irradiated produce to the mainland U.S.[86]

In total, 6 876 tonnes of food products were irradiated in European Union countries in 2013; mainly in four member state countries: Belgium (49.4%), the Netherlands (24.4%), Spain (12.7%) and France (10.0%). The two types of foods irradiated the most were frog legs (46%), and dried herbs and spices (25%). There has been a decrease of 14% in the total quantity of products irradiated in the EU compared to the previous year 2012 (7 972 tonnes) [89]

Timeline of the history of food irradiation

See also


  1. bulbs and tubers
  2. to help clear quarantine
  3. 1 2 3 fresh or frozen red meat, poultry, and seafood
  4. improve hygienic quality
  5. shelf stable without refrigeration


  1. 1 2 3 4 anon., Food Irradiation – A technique for preserving and improving the safety of food, WHO, Geneva, 1991
  2. "Food Irradiation" Canadian Food Inspection Agency. March 22, 2014.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Martin, Andrew. Spinach and Peanuts, With a Dash of Radiation. New York Times. February 1, 2009.
  4. 1 2 Conley, S.T., What do consumers think about irradiated foods, FSIS Food Safety Review (Fall 1992), 11-15
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Diehl, J.F., Safety of irradiated foods, Marcel Dekker, N.Y., 1995 (2. ed.)
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 World Health Organization. Wholesomeness of irradiated food. Geneva, Technical Report Series No. 659, 1981
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 World Health Organization. High-Dose Irradiation: Wholesomeness of Food Irradiated With Doses Above 10 kGy. Report of a Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Study Group. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1999. WHO Technical Report Series No. 890
  8. 1 2 World Health Organization. Safety and Nutritional Adequacy of Irradiated Food. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1994
  9. 1 2 US Department of Health, and Human Services, Food, and Drug Administration Irradiation in the production, processing, and handling of food. Federal Register 1986; 51:13376-13399
  10. 1 2 anon., Safety and nutritional adequacy of irradiated food, WHO, Geneva, 1994
  11. 1 2 anon., Scientific Opinion on the Chemical Safety of Irradiation of Food, EFSA Journal 2011;9(4):1930 [57 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1930 last visited March 3, 2013
  12. "Irradiation testing for correct labelling you can trust". Eurofins Scientific. January 2015. Retrieved February 9, 2015.
  13. "Food Irradiation Clearances". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  14. Food irradiation, Position of ADA, J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:246-253. retrieved November 15, 2007
  15. C.M. Deeley, M. Gao, R. Hunter, D.A.E. Ehlermann, The development of food irradiation in the Asia Pacific, the Americas and Europe; tutorial presented to the International Meeting on Radiation Processing, Kuala Lumpur, 2006.,cntnt01,detail,0&cntnt01articleid=488&cntnt01detailtemplate=resourceCenter-publication-detail-template&cntnt01returnid=231&hl=en_US last visited February 18, 2010
  16. Kume, T. et al., Status of food irradiation in the world, Radiat.Phys.Chem. 78(2009), 222-226
  17. Farkas, J. et al., History and future of food irradiation, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 22 (2011), 121-126
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Loaharanu, Paisan (1990). "Food irradiation: Facts or fiction?." (PDF). IAEA Bulletin (32.2): 44–48. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  19. Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA, International Database on Insect Disinfestation and Sterilization – IDIDAS last visited November 16, 2007
  20. Consumer Attitudes and Market Response to Irradiated Food, Author: Bruhn, Christine M.1 Journal of Food Protection, Volume 58, Number 2, February 1995, pp. 175–181(7), Publisher: International Association for Food Protection
  21. Harris, Gardinier, "F.D.A. Allows Irradiation of Some Produce", The New York Times, August 22, 2008.
  22. 1 2 3 "Radiation Protection-Food Safety". Retrieved May 19, 2014.
  23. "kid question rotting". Retrieved May 19, 2014.
  24. Rajamani Karthikeyan, Manivasagam T, Anantharaman P, Balasubramanian T, Somasundaram ST; Manivasagam; Anantharaman; Balasubramanian; Somasundaram (2011). "Chemopreventive effect of Padina boergesenii extracts on ferric nitrilotriacetate (Fe-NTA)-induced oxidative damage in Wistar rats". J. Appl. Phycol. 23, Issue 2, Page 257 (2): 257–263. doi:10.1007/s10811-010-9564-0.
  25. 1 2 Bahramikia, S., & Yazdanparast, R. (2010). Antioxidant efficacy of Nasturtium officinale extracts using various in vitro assay systems. Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies, 3, 283–290
  26. 1 2 Bhat, R., Sridhar, K. R., Tomita, Y., & Tomita-Yokotanib, K. (2007). Effect of ionizing radiation on antinutritional features of velvet bean seeds (Mucuna pruriens). Food Chemistry, 103, 860–866
  27. 1 2 3 4 Pinela, José; Barreira, João C. M.; Barros, Lillian; Verde, Sandra Cabo; Antonio, Amilcar L.; Carvalho, Ana Maria; Oliveira, M. Beatriz P. P.; Ferreira, Isabel C. F. R. (2016-09-01). "Suitability of gamma irradiation for preserving fresh-cut watercress quality during cold storage". Food Chemistry. 206: 50–58. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.050.
  28. Nunes, T. P., Martins, C. G., Faria, A. F., Bíscola, V., Souza, K. L. O., Mercadante, A. Z., et al. (2013). Changes in total ascorbic acid and carotenoids in minimally processed irradiated Arugula (Eruca sativa Mill) stored under refrigeration. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 90, 125–130. "Changes in total ascorbic acid and caroteniods in minimally processed irradiated Arugula". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.03.044.
  29. Fan, X., & Sokorai, K. J. B. (2011). Changes in quality, liking, and purchase intent of irradiated fresh-cut spinach during storage. Journal of Food Science, 76, 363–368.
  30. Vaishnav, J., Adiani, V., & Variyar, P. S. (2015). Radiation processing for enhancing shelf life and quality characteristics of minimally processed ready-to-cook (RTC) cauliflower (Brassica oleracea). Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 5, 50–55.
  31. Tripathi, J., Chatterjee, S., Vaishnav, J., Variyar, P. S., & Sharma, A. (2013). Gamma irradiation increases storability and shelf life of minimally processed ready-tocook (RTC) ash gourd (Benincasa hispida) cubes. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 76, 17–25.
  32. Zeng, F., Luo, Z., Xie, J., & Feng, S. (2015). Gamma radiation control quality and lignification of bamboo shoots (Phyllostachys praecox f. prevernalis.) stored at low temperature. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 102, 17–24.
  33. Trigo, M. J., Sousa, M. B., Sapata, M. M., Ferreira, A., Curado, T., Andrada, L., ... Veloso, M. G. (2009). Radiation processing of minimally processed vegetables and aromatic plants. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 78, 659–663
  34. "What's wrong with food irradiation?". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  35. Rose, P., Won, Y. K., Ong, C. N., & Whiteman, M. (2005). Beta-phenylethyl and 8- methylsulphinyloctyl isothiocyanates, constituents of watercress, suppress LPS induced production of nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Nitric Oxide, 12, 237–243
  36. Ramos, B., Miller, F. A., Brandão, T. R. S., Teixeira, P., & Silva, C. L. M. (2013). Fresh fruits and vegetables – An overview on applied methodologies to improve its quality and safety. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 20, 1–15.
  37. "Food Irradiation: Unresolved Issues" (PDF). Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2001:33. Retrieved July 15, 2009. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  38. 1 2 3 "The experimental induction of leukoencephalomyelopathy in cats". Retrieved July 15, 2009.
  40. 1 2 Scientific Committee on Food. Revised opinion #193.
  41. R.L. Wolke, What Einstein told his cook – Kitchen science explained, W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York, 2002; see p.310 "Some Illumination on Irradiation"
  42. "Ethiopia Is Using Radiation to Eradicate Tsetse Flies". November 14, 2012. Retrieved June 18, 2014.
  43. Applegate, K. L.; Chipley, J. R. (March 31, 1976). "Production of ochratoxin A by Aspergillus ochraceus NRRL-3174 before and after exposures to 60Co irradiation". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 31 (3): 349–353. PMC 169778Freely accessible. PMID 938031.
  44. "SCIENTIFIC STATUS SUMMARY Irradiation of Food". Institute of Food Technologists’ Expert Panel on Food Safety and Nutrition in Food Technology. January 1998. Retrieved May 30, 2015.
  45. "Does the XL Foods E-coli Scare Make the Case for Irradiation?". February 11, 2001. Retrieved June 18, 2014.
  46. 1 2 3 4 5 (PDF) Missing or empty |title= (help)
  47. D.A.E. Ehlermann, The RADURA-terminology and food irradiation, Food Control 20 (2009), 526-528, doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.07.023
  48. Cold Pasteurization of Food By Irradiation by Tim Roberts, Extension Specialist, Food Safety, Virginia Tech; Publication Number 458-300, posted August 1998 retrieved on November 15, 2007 Retrieved June 1, 2016. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  49. See, e.g., The Truth about Irradiated Meat, CONSUMER REPORTS 34-37 (August 2003).
  50. 1 2 "The Use of Irradiation for Post-Harvest and Quarantine Commodity Control | Ozone Depletion – Regulatory Programs | U.S. EPA". Archived from the original on April 21, 2006. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  51. 1 2 3 4 anon., Gamma Irradiators for Radiation Processing, IAEA, Vienna, 2005
  52. "anon., Dosimetry for Food Irradiation, IAEA, Vienna, 2002, Technical Reports Series No. 409" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  53. K. Mehta, Radiation Processing Dosimetry – A practical manual, 2006, GEX Corporation, Centennial, US
  54. "Irradiated Food Authorization Database (IFA)". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  55. "U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition. Office of Premarket Approval. ''Food Irradiation: The treatment of foods with ionizing radiation'' Kim M. Morehouse, PhD Published in ''Food Testing & Analysis'', June/July 1998 edition (Vol. 4, No. 3, Pages 9, 32, 35)". March 29, 2007. Archived from the original on March 29, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  56. "''Annex III of Directive 1999/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning foods and food ingredients treated with ionising radiation (OJ L 66, 13.3.1999, p. 16)''.". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  57. "Information Notice No. 89-82: RECENT SAFETY-RELATED INCIDENTS AT LARGE IRRADIATORS". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  58. Whaites, Eric; Roderick Cawson (2002). Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology. Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 15–20. ISBN 0-443-07027-X.
  59. (Forsythe and Evangel 1993, USDA 1989)
  60. (Kunstadt et al., USDA 1989)
  61. 1 2 "''GENERAL STANDARD FOR THE LABELLING OF PREPACKAGED FOODS''. CODEX STAN 1-1985." (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  62. Expand "Food Irradiation Reports" and select respective annual report and language
  63. "CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  64. (see Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 12.02, West Conshohocken, PA, US)
  65. FDA, Irradiation in the production, processing and handling of food. Final rule, Fed. Reg., 51: 13376-13399 (1986) this is the initial and general ruling; later amendments on various details have been published in Fed. Reg.
  66. USDA/FSIS and USDA/APHIS, various final rules on pork, poultry and fresh fruits: Fed.Reg. 51:1769–1771 (1986); 54:387-393 (1989); 57:43588-43600 (1992); and others more
  67. anon.,Is this technology being used in other countries? retrieved on November 15, 2007
  68. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Food Irradiation-FMI Background" (PDF). Food Marketing Institute. February 5, 2003. Retrieved June 2, 2014.
  69. anon., Are irradiated foods in the U.S. supermarkets now? retrieved on November 15, 2007
  70. "Irradiation: A safe measure for safer iceberg lettuce and spinach". US FDA. August 22, 2008. Retrieved December 31, 2009.
  71. EU: Food Irradiation – Community Legislation
  72. "Official Journal of the European Communities. 24 November, 2009. ''List of Member States' authorisations of food and food ingredients which may be treated with ionizing radiation.''". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  73. "Official Journal of the European Communities. 23 October 2002. ''COMMISSION DECISION of 23 October 2004 adopting the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods.''". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  74. "Official Journal of the European Communities. October 13, 2004. ''COMMISSION DECISION of October 7, 2004 amending Decision 2002/840/EC adopting the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods.''" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  75. "Official Journal of the European Communities. 23 October 2007. ''Commission Decision of 4 December 2007 amending Decision 2002/840/EC as regards the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods.''" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  76. "Official Journal of the European Communities. 23 March 2010 ''COMMISSION DECISION of 22 March 2010 amending Decision 2002/840/EC as regards the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods.''". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  77. "Official Journal of the European Communities of 24 May 2012 ''COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 21 May 2012 amending Decision 2002/840/EC adopting the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods.''". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  80. Burke, Kelly (November 28, 2008). "Cat food firm blames death on quarantine controls". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved April 29, 2013.
  81. Dickson, James. "Radiation meets food". Physics Today. Retrieved March 22, 2013.
  82. International Atomic Energy Agency. The Radiological Accident in Soreq
  83. McMurray, C.H., Gray, R., Stewart, E.M., Pearce, J., Detection methods for irradiated foods, Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge (GB); 1996
  84. Raffi, J., Delincée, H., Marchioni, E., Hasselmann, C., Sjöberg, A.-M., Leonardi, M., Kent, M., Bögl, K.-W., Schreiber, G., Stevenson, H., Meier, W., Concerted action of the community bureau of reference on methods of identification of irradiated foods; bcr information; European Commission; Luxembourg; 1994, 119 p.; EUR--15261
  85. "General Codex Methods for the Detection of Irradiated Foods, CODEX STAN 231-2001, Rev.1 2003" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  86. 1 2 3 4 "Food Irradiation in Asia, the European Union, and the United States" (PDF). Japan Radioisotope Association. May 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
  87. "APHIS Factsheet" (PDF). United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. December 2008. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  88. "Guidance for importing mangoes into the United States from Pakistan" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  89. "Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Food and Food Ingredients Treated with Ionising Radiation FOR THE YEAR 2013" (PDF). European Commission. February 25, 2015. Retrieved July 18, 2015.
  90. Minck, F. (1896) Zur Frage über die Einwirkung der Röntgen'schen Strahlen auf Bacterien und ihre eventuelle therapeutische Verwendbarkeit. Münchener Medicinische Wochenschrift 43 (5), 101-102.
  91. S.C. Prescott,The effect of radium rays on the colon bacillus, the diphtheria bacillus and yeast. Science XX(1904) no.503, 246-248
  92. Appleby, J. and Banks, A. J. Improvements in or relating to the treatment of food, more especially cereals and their products. British patent GB 1609 (January 4, 1906).
  93. D.C. Gillet, Apparatus for preserving organic materials by the use of x-rays, US Patent No. 1,275,417 (August 13, 1918)
  94. Schwartz, B. Effect of X-rays on Trichinae. Journal of Agricultural Research 20 (1921) 845-854
  95. O. Wüst, Procédé pour la conservation d'aliments en tous genres, Brevet d'invention no.701302 (July 17, 1930)
  96. Physical Principles of Food Preservation: Von Marcus Karel, Daryl B. Lund, CRC Press, 2003 ISBN 0-8247-4063-7, S. 462 ff.
  97. K.F. Maurer, Zur Keimfreimachung von Gewürzen, Ernährungswirtschaft 5(1958) nr.1, 45-47
  98. Scientific Committee on Food. 15.
  99. "Statement summarising the Conclusions and Recommendations from the Opinions on the Safety of Irradiation of Food adopted by the BIOHAZ and CEF Panels." (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.

Further reading

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Food irradiation.
Wikibooks has more on the topic of: Food irradiation
Look up food irradiation in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/30/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.