Doping at the 1999 Tour de France

At the time of the 1999 Tour de France there was no official test for EPO. In August 2005, 60 remaining antidoping samples from the 1998 Tour and 84 remaining antidoping samples given by riders during the 1999 Tour, were tested retrospectively for recombinant EPO by using three recently developed detection methods. More precisely the laboratory compared the result of test method A: "Autoradiography — visual inspection of light emitted from a strip displaying the isoelectric profile for EPO" (published in the Nature journal as the first EPO detection method in June 2000[1]), with the result of test method B: "Percentage of basic isoforms — using an ultra-sensitive camera that by percentage quantify the light intensity emitted from each of the isoelectric bands" (pioneered at the Olympics in September 2000, with values above 80% classified as positive, but the laboratory applying an 85% threshold for retrospective samples — to be absolutely certain that no false-positives can occur when analyzing on samples stored for multiple years). For those samples with enough urine left, these results of test method A+B were finally also compared with the best and latest test method C: "Statistical discriminant analysis — taking account all the band profiles by statistical distinguish calculations for each band" (which feature both higher sensitivity and accuracy compared to test method B[2]).[3]

At first, the rider names with a positive sample in the retrospective test were not made public, because this extra test had only been conducted as scientific research, with the purpose of validating the newest invented EPO-test method based on "statistical discriminant analysis". On 23 August 2005, only one day after the confidential test report had been submitted by the test laboratorium LNDD to WADA and the French Ministry for Sports, the French newspaper L'Équipe however reported, that after having access to all Lance Armstrong's Sample IDs, they had managed to link him to 6 out of the 12 "definitely EPO-positive" samples.[4] The phrase "definitely EPO-positive" referred to that all three applied test methods (A+B+C) had returned a positive result,[4] and it was reported Armstrong's six samples satisfying this requirement had been collected on the following dates: 3+4+13+14+16+18 July 1999.[5] From the leaked report it was also possible to conclude, that all of the four unidentified riders tested at the Prologue on top of the list, had submitted samples being EPO positive by all three applied test methods. As it was known from earlier press reports, that only four named riders (Beltran, Castelblanco, Hamburger and Armstrong) had been tested in the Prologue, they were all identified as having tested EPO-positive.[6]

In response, UCI published the so-called Vrijman report in May 2006, where they alleged WADA had been responsible for the leak of the confidential test report to the press, and had been complotting against Lance Armstrong when they asked the French laboratorium to note sample IDs in their confidential report, as Vrijman suspected they already had inside knowledge of some journalists being in possession of Armstrongs confidential doping forms — knowing that this all together could be used to link him to the positive samples.[7] However, a few days later, WADA published a full written reply to completely rebut this accusation, and was moreover able to proof the journalist in fact had received the Armstrong doping forms by legal ways, from UCI itself — with Armstrong's written consent — and without any help/interference by WADA.[8]

In July 2013, the antidoping committee of the French Senate decided it would benefit the current doping fight to shed some more light on the past, and so decided — as part of their "Commission of Inquiry into the effectiveness of the fight against doping" report — to publish all of the 1998 rider doping forms and some of the 1999 rider doping forms, along with the result of the retrospective test of the 1998+1999 samples, which made name identification possible for the various sample IDs. This publication revealed for the 1999 samples, that 13 of the 20 positive samples belonged to 6 riders (Lance Armstrong, Kevin Livingston, Manuel Beltrán, José Castelblanco, Bo Hamburger, and Wladimir Belli), with the remaining 7 positive samples still not identified. Beside of the 20 positive samples, 34 were reported to have tested negative, and the remaining 30 samples were inconclusive due to sample degradation.[3]


34 Negative samples for Recombinant EPO[3]
Sample ID Date Rider Team
185-553 044 July No ID N/A
185-558 04 4 July No ID N/A
185-559 04 4 July No ID N/A
185-560 04 4 July No ID N/A
186-581 05 (Serie Labo=13/07) 5/6 July No ID N/A
186-582 05 (Serie Labo=13/07) 5/6 July No ID N/A
186-587 05 (Serie Labo=13/07) 5/6 July No ID N/A
160-292 06 (Serie Labo=40/07) 6/5 July No ID N/A
186-590 06 (Serie Labo=40/07) 6/5 July No ID N/A
186-075 07 7 July No ID N/A
186-076 07 7 July No ID N/A
186-077 07 7 July No ID N/A
186-079 07 7 July  Mariano Piccoli (ITA) Lampre
186-071 10 (Serie Labo=55/07) 10/12 July No ID N/A
186-073 10 (Serie Labo=55/07) 10/12 July No ID N/A
157-378 09 9 July No ID N/A
157-380 09 9 July No ID N/A
160-296 08 8 July  Marcos Serrano (ESP) ONCE
157-376 12 (Serie Labo=61/07) 12/10 July No ID N/A
160-291 12 (Serie Labo=61/07) 12/10 July No ID N/A
186-078 12 (Serie Labo=61/07) 12/10 July No ID N/A
186-080 12 (Serie Labo=61/07) 12/10 July No ID N/A
186-396 13 July No ID N/A
186-398 13 July  Jörg Jaksche (GER) Telekom
185-893 14 July No ID N/A
186-589 11 July  Andrea Peron (ITA) ONCE
185-472 16 July No ID N/A
185-480 16 July No ID N/A
185-478 17 July No ID N/A
185-891 18 July No ID N/A
185-896 20 July  Abraham Olano (ESP) ONCE
185-884 22 July  Tom Steels (BEL) Mapei
185-900 22 July  Lylian Lebreton (FRA) BigMat-Auber 93
186-358 22 July  Gabriele Colombo (ITA) Cantina Tollo

20 Positive samples for Recombinant EPO[3][n 1]
Sample ID Date Rider Team
157-371 or
03 3 July  Manuel Beltrán (ESP)[6] Banesto
160-294 or
03 3 July  José Castelblanco (COL)[6] Kelme
160-297 03 3 July  Lance Armstrong (USA)[9] US Postal
160-300 03 3 July  Bo Hamburger (DEN)[3] Cantina Tollo
157-372 04 4 July  Lance Armstrong (USA)[9][10] US Postal
186-585**05 (Serie Labo=13/07) 5/6 July No ID N/A
186-586**05 (Serie Labo=13/07) 5/6 July No ID N/A
157-373 09 9 July  Kevin Livingston (USA)[3] US Postal
160-293* 12 (Serie Labo=61/07) 12/10 July No ID N/A
186-584* 11 July  Lance Armstrong (USA)[9] US Postal
185-557 13 July  Lance Armstrong (USA)[9] US Postal
185-894* 13 July No ID N/A
185-479 14 July  Lance Armstrong (USA)[3][9] US Postal
186-399 14 July No ID N/A
185-475 16 July  Lance Armstrong (USA)[9] US Postal
185-895* 17 July  Lance Armstrong (USA)[9] US Postal
185-892* 18 July No ID N/A
185-898 18 July No ID N/A
186-397 18 July  Lance Armstrong (USA)[9] US Postal
185-555** 20 July  Wladimir Belli (ITA)[3] Festina-Lotus


Among the riders testing EPO positive during the 1999 Tour, the following riders have confessed indeed to be EPO positive:

Among the riders in the race who never had their samples tested doping positive, the following never-the-less later on confessed also to have doped in preparation/during the 1999 Tour de France:

Christophe Bassons

French rider Christophe Bassons had come to be known as one of the few riders of the Festina scandal who was not doping. During the 1999 tour he wrote some articles about cycling, the tour, and about doping, finding the speeds to be "suspicious".[18] The peloton began to turn against him, refusing to speak to him, and otherwise shunning him.[19]

Stage 10 occurred on July 14 and was from Sestrieres to Alpe d'Huez. Bassons would later tell the story of this stage to media, including an October 2012 interview with the BBC. He said that nobody had been talking to him. The entire peloton planned to ride slow for the first 100 km without telling him. Bassons only heard about this because a mechanic from his team told him. Bassons decided he was "fed up" and decided to ride ahead of the others ("attacked from the start"). As they came to a flat spot, "all of the teams rode together to close me down". As the teams rode by him, they looked at him.[19]

" . . . and then Lance Armstrong reached me. He grabbed me by the shoulder, because he knew that everyone would be watching, and he knew that at that moment, he could show everyone that he was the boss. He stopped me, and he said what I was saying wasn't true, what I was saying was bad for cycling, that I mustn't say it, that I had no right to be a professional cyclist, that I should quit cycling, that I should quit the tour, and finished by saying [*beep*] you. . . . I was depressed for 6 months. I was crying all of the time. I was in a really bad way." - Bassons, on BBC Radio 5, 2012 10 15[19]

In 2011/2012, after investigations into past doping in cycling, especially the 2012 USADA report on Armstrong's US Postal Service team, the media began to re-tell Bassons story. In one interview for the BBC, Armstrong teammate Tyler Hamilton publicly apologized for being part of the peloton that shunned him, saying that he was "100% wrong" not to talk to him. Bassons said "that's life, it's nothing. I don't begrudge Hamilton. I understand."[19]

David Walsh would later claim that Armstrong's treatment of Bassons was what first raised doubts about Armstrong in his mind. These doubts culminated in the 2004 book L. A. Confidentiel which he co-wrote with Pierre Ballester. It contained testimony from Emma O'Reilly (US Postal soigneur) and others about Armstrong's alleged doping, including during the 1999 tour.[20]


  1. Unmarked samples were tested positive by all three test methods. Positive samples marked with a *, were only analyzed by the visual inspection test "autoradiography" (referred to as "test method A"), and not by one of the later WADA approved EPO detection test methods (referred to as test method B and C). Positive samples marked with **, were analyzed positive by both test method A+C.[3] The two first samples marked with ***, returned a positive result by all three test methods, and have been identified through the fact that only four riders (Beltran, Castelblanco, Hamburger and Armstrong) were tested on 3 July, while we know from the report plus another source that sample ID 160-297 and 160-300 belong respectively to Armstrong[9] and Hamburger,[3] and thus it can be concluded the two remaining unidentified positives from 3 July belong to Manuel Beltran and José Castelblanco.[6]


  1. Françoise Lasne & Jacques de Ceaurriz (8 June 2000). "Recombinant erythropoietin in urine". Nature 405, p.635 (8 June 2000). Nature journal. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
  2. Françoise Lasne; et al. (13 June 2006). "Detection of recombinant human erythropoietin in urine for doping analysis — Interpretation of isoelectric profiles by discriminant analysis" (PDF). Electrophoresis 2007, 28, p.1875–1881. Electrophoresis. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "Rapport Fait au nom de la commission d'enquête sur l'efficacité de la lutte contre le dopage (Annexe 6: Résultats test EPO Tour De France 1998 et 1999)" (PDF). N° 782, Sénat Session Extraordinaire de 2012-2013 (in French). French Senate. 17 July 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  4. 1 2 "An interview with L'Equipe's Damien Ressiot: The author of it all". Cyclingnews. 7 September 2005. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
  5. "Tour champion under the microscope again: Did Armstrong and six others use EPO in 1999?". Cyclingnews. 23 August 2005. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "First Edition Cycling News for September 12, 2005: Three more names published from 1999 Tour". Cyclingnews. 12 September 2005. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
  7. "Independent Investigation: Analysis Samples from the 1999 Tour de France" (PDF). Cyclingnews. 31 May 2006. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
  8. "Official statement from WADA on the Vrijman report" (PDF). WADA. 19 June 2006. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Michael Ashenden (interview)". Velocity Nation. 2 April 2009. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
  10. "L'UCI a couvert Lance Armstrong dès le Tour 1999" (in French). Le Monde. 21 January 2013. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
  11. 1 2 "Lance Armstrong Receives Lifetime Ban And Disqualification Of Competitive Results For Doping Violations Stemming From His Involvement In The United States Postal Service Pro-Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy, USADA". Retrieved 2012-11-10.
  12. "Klier admits usage of doping products during his pro career, loses results from 2005 onwards". VeloNation. 15 August 2013. Retrieved 19 August 2013.
  13. "Lance Armstrong comes clean". News Services. 17 January 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
  14. "Boogerd gives detailed confession about doping to Dutch media". Velonation. 6 March 2013. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  15. "Affidavit of George Hincapie" (PDF). USADA. p. 6.
  16. "Affidavit of Christian Vande Velde" (PDF). USADA. 25 September 2012. Retrieved 19 August 2013.
  17. "Erik Zabel im SZ-Interview "Meine Schuld wird mich immer begleiten"" (in German). Sueddeutsche Zeitung. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 30 July 2013.
  18. Bassons: ‘People Now See I Wasn’t Lying’, James Startt,, October 15th, 2012
  19. 1 2 3 4 Peddlers - Cycling's Dirty Truth, 54:00, Mark Chapman, including interviews with Tyler Hamilton, Bassons, and others. BBC Radio 5 live, 2012 10 15, retr 2012 10 16
  20. David Walsh: 'It was obvious to me Lance Armstrong was doping' Andrew Pugh, Press Gazette, 11 October 2012, retr 2012 10 20
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/13/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.