Decompression sickness

Not to be confused with Decompression (diving).
Decompression sickness

Photograph of the cramped interior of a cylinder containing two benches

Two United States Navy sailors prepare for training inside a decompression chamber.
Classification and external resources
Specialty Emergency medicine
ICD-10 T70.3
ICD-9-CM 993.3
DiseasesDB 3491
eMedicine emerg/121
MeSH C21.866.120.248

Decompression sickness (DCS; also known as divers' disease, the bends or caisson disease) describes a condition arising from dissolved gases coming out of solution into bubbles inside the body on depressurisation. DCS most commonly refers to problems arising from underwater diving decompression (i.e., during ascent), but may be experienced in other depressurisation events such as working in a caisson, flying in an unpressurised aircraft, and extravehicular activity from spacecraft.

Since bubbles can form in or migrate to any part of the body, DCS can produce many symptoms, and its effects may vary from joint pain and rashes to paralysis and death. Individual susceptibility can vary from day to day, and different individuals under the same conditions may be affected differently or not at all. The classification of types of DCS by its symptoms has evolved since its original description over a hundred years ago.

Exposure to DCS on diving can be managed through proper decompression procedures and contracting it is now uncommon. Its potential severity has driven much research to prevent it and divers universally use dive tables or dive computers to limit their exposure and to control their ascent speed. If DCS is contracted, it is treated by hyperbaric oxygen therapy in a recompression chamber. If treated early, there is a significantly higher chance of successful recovery.

DCS is a subset of Decompression illness (DCI) which includes both DCS and Arterial gas embolism (AGE).


DCS is classified by symptoms. The earliest descriptions of DCS used the terms: "bends" for joint or skeletal pain; "chokes" for breathing problems; and "staggers" for neurological problems.[1] In 1960, Golding et al. introduced a simpler classification using the term "Type I ('simple')" for symptoms involving only the skin, musculoskeletal system, or lymphatic system, and "Type II ('serious')" for symptoms where other organs (such as the central nervous system) are involved.[1] Type II DCS is considered more serious and usually has worse outcomes.[2] This system, with minor modifications, may still be used today.[3] Following changes to treatment methods, this classification is now much less useful in diagnosis,[4] since neurological symptoms may develop after the initial presentation, and both Type I and Type II DCS have the same initial management.[5]

Decompression illness and dysbarism

The term dysbarism encompasses decompression sickness, arterial gas embolism, and barotrauma, whereas decompression sickness and arterial gas embolism are commonly classified together as decompression illness when a precise diagnosis cannot be made.[6] DCS and arterial gas embolism are treated very similarly because they are both the result of gas bubbles in the body.[5] The U.S. Navy prescribes identical treatment for Type II DCS and arterial gas embolism.[7] Their spectra of symptoms also overlap, although those from arterial gas embolism are generally more severe because they often arise from an infarction (blockage of blood supply and tissue death).

Signs and symptoms

While bubbles can form anywhere in the body, DCS is most frequently observed in the shoulders, elbows, knees, and ankles. Joint pain ("the bends") accounts for about 60% to 70% of all altitude DCS cases, with the shoulder being the most common site. Neurological symptoms are present in 10% to 15% of DCS cases with headache and visual disturbances being the most common symptom. Skin manifestations are present in about 10% to 15% of cases. Pulmonary DCS ("the chokes") is very rare in divers and has been observed much less frequently in aviators since the introduction of oxygen pre-breathing protocols.[8] The table below shows symptoms for different DCS types.[9]

Signs and symptoms of decompression sickness
DCS type Bubble location Signs & symptoms (clinical manifestations)
Musculoskeletal Mostly large joints

(elbows, shoulders, hip, wrists, knees, ankles)

  • Localized deep pain, ranging from mild to excruciating. Sometimes a dull ache, but rarely a sharp pain.
  • Active and passive motion of the joint aggravates the pain.
  • The pain may be reduced by bending the joint to find a more comfortable position.
  • If caused by altitude, pain can occur immediately or up to many hours later.
Cutaneous Skin
  • Itching, usually around the ears, face, neck, arms, and upper torso
  • Sensation of tiny insects crawling over the skin (formication)
  • Mottled or marbled skin usually around the shoulders, upper chest and abdomen, with itching
  • Swelling of the skin, accompanied by tiny scar-like skin depressions (pitting edema)
Neurologic Brain
  • Altered sensation, tingling or numbness (paresthesia), increased sensitivity (hyperesthesia)
  • Confusion or memory loss (amnesia)
  • Visual abnormalities
  • Unexplained mood or behaviour changes
  • Seizures, unconsciousness
Neurologic Spinal cord
Constitutional Whole body
  • Headache
  • Unexplained fatigue
  • Generalised malaise, poorly localised aches
Audiovestibular Inner ear [10][lower-alpha 1]
Pulmonary Lungs


The distribution of symptoms of DCS observed by the U.S. Navy are as follows:[11]

Symptoms by frequency
Symptoms Frequency
local joint pain 89%
arm symptoms 70%
leg symptoms 30%
dizziness 5.3%
paralysis 2.3%
shortness of breath 1.6%
extreme fatigue 1.3%
collapse/unconsciousness 0.5%


Although onset of DCS can occur rapidly after a dive, in more than half of all cases symptoms do not begin to appear for at least an hour. In extreme cases, symptoms may occur before the dive has been completed. The U.S. Navy and Technical Diving International, a leading technical diver training organization, have published a table that indicates onset of first symptoms. The table does not differentiate between types of DCS, or types of symptom.[12][13]

Onset of DCS symptoms
Time to onset Percentage of cases
within 1 hour 42%
within 3 hours 60%
within 8 hours 83%
within 24 hours 98%
within 48 hours 100%


DCS is caused by a reduction in ambient pressure that results in the formation of bubbles of inert gases within tissues of the body. It may happen when leaving a high-pressure environment, ascending from depth, or ascending to altitude.

Ascent from depth

DCS is best known as a diving disorder that affects divers having breathed gas that is at a higher pressure than the surface pressure, owing to the pressure of the surrounding water. The risk of DCS increases when diving for extended periods or at greater depth, without ascending gradually and making the decompression stops needed to slowly reduce the excess pressure of inert gases dissolved in the body. The specific risk factors are not well understood and some divers may be more susceptible than others under identical conditions.[14][15] DCS has been confirmed in rare cases of breath-holding divers who have made a sequence of many deep dives with short surface intervals; and it may be the cause of the disease called taravana by South Pacific island natives who for centuries have dived by breath-holding for food and pearls.[16]

Two principal factors control the risk of a diver suffering DCS:

  1. the rate and duration of gas absorption under pressure – the deeper or longer the dive the more gas is absorbed into body tissue in higher concentrations than normal (Henry's Law);
  2. the rate and duration of outgassing on depressurization – the faster the ascent and the shorter the interval between dives the less time there is for absorbed gas to be offloaded safely through the lungs, causing these gases to come out of solution and form "micro bubbles" in the blood.[17]

Even when the change in pressure causes no immediate symptoms, rapid pressure change can cause permanent bone injury called dysbaric osteonecrosis (DON). DON can develop from a single exposure to rapid decompression.[18]

Leaving a high-pressure environment

Schematic of a caisson
The principal features of a caisson are the workspace, pressurised by an external air supply, and the access tube with an airlock

When workers leave a pressurized caisson or a mine that has been pressurized to keep water out, they will experience a significant reduction in ambient pressure.[14][19] A similar pressure reduction occurs when astronauts exit a space vehicle to perform a space-walk or extra-vehicular activity, where the pressure in their spacesuit is lower than the pressure in the vehicle.[14][20][21][22]

The original name for DCS was "caisson disease". This term was introduced in the 19th century, when caissons under pressure were used to keep water from flooding large engineering excavations below the water table, such as bridge supports and tunnels. Workers spending time in high ambient pressure conditions are at risk when they return to the lower pressure outside the caisson if the pressure is not reduced slowly. DCS was a major factor during construction of Eads Bridge, when 15 workers died from what was then a mysterious illness, and later during construction of the Brooklyn Bridge, where it incapacitated the project leader Washington Roebling.[23] On the other side of the Manhattan island during contruction of the Hudson River Tunnel contractor's agent Ernest William Moir noted in 1889 that workers were dying due to decompression sickness and pioneered the use of an airlock chamber for treatment.[24]

Ascent to altitude

Passengers may be at risk of DCS when an unpressurized aircraft ascends to high altitude.[14][20][21][25] Likewise, there is increased risk for divers flying in any aircraft shortly after diving, since even in a pressurized aircraft the cabin pressure is not maintained at sea-level pressure but may drop to as low as 73% of sea level pressure.[14][20][26]

Altitude DCS became a common problem in the 1930s with the development of high-altitude balloon and aircraft flights. Today, cabin pressurization systems maintain commercial aircraft cabin pressure at the equivalent altitude of 2,400 m (7,900 ft) or less, allowing safe flights at 12,000 m (39,000 ft) or more. DCS is very rare in healthy individuals who experience pressures equivalent to this altitude. However, since the pressure in the cabin is not actually maintained at sea-level pressure, there is still a risk of DCS in individuals having dived recently. Also, cabin pressurization systems fail occasionally, and some people may be vulnerable to the drop in pressure that occurs even in pressurized aircraft.[27][28]

There is no specific altitude threshold that can be considered safe for everyone and below which no one will develop altitude DCS. Nevertheless, there is very little evidence of altitude DCS occurring among healthy individuals ( who have not been underwater diving ) at pressure altitudes below 5,500 m (18,000 ft). The higher the altitude of exposure the greater is the risk of developing altitude DCS. Although exposures to incremental altitudes above 5,500 m (18,000 ft) show an incremental risk of altitude DCS, they do not show a direct relationship with the severity of the various types of DCS. Individual exposures to pressure altitudes between 5,500 m (18,000 ft) and 7,500 m (24,600 ft) have shown a low occurrence of altitude DCS. A US Air Force study of altitude DCS cases reported that 87% of incidents occurred at 7,500 m (24,600 ft) or higher.[29] High-altitude parachutists performing a HALO jump may develop altitude DCS if they do not flush nitrogen from the body by pre-breathing pure oxygen.[30]

Predisposing factors

Although the occurrence of DCS is not easily predictable, many predisposing factors are known. They may be considered as either environmental or individual. Decompression sickness and arterial gas embolism in recreational diving are associated with certain demographic, environmental, and dive style factors. A statistical study published in 2005 tested potential risk factors: age, gender, body mass index, smoking, asthma, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, previous decompression illness, years since certification, dives in the last year, number of diving days, number of dives in a repetitive series, last dive depth, nitrox use, and drysuit use. No significant associations with risk of decompression sickness or arterial gas embolism were found for asthma, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, smoking, or body mass index. Increased depth, previous DCI, larger number of consecutive days diving, and being male were associated with higher risk for decompression sickness and arterial gas embolism. Nitrox and drysuit use, greater frequency of diving in the past year, increasing age, and years since certification were associated with lower risk, possibly as indicators of more extensive training and experience.[31]


The following environmental factors have been shown to increase the risk of DCS:


Diagram of the four chambers of the heart. There is a gap in the wall between the upper-left and upper-right chambers
Atrial septal defect (PFO) showing left-to-right shunt. A right-to-left shunt may allow bubbles to pass into the arterial circulation.

The following individual factors have been identified as possibly contributing to increased risk of DCS:


A diver being helped out of his bulky diving gear
This surfacing diver must enter a decompression chamber for surface decompression, a standard operating procedure to avoid decompression sickness after long or deep bounce dives.

Depressurisation causes inert gases, which were dissolved under higher pressure, to come out of physical solution and form gas bubbles within the body. These bubbles produce the symptoms of decompression sickness.[14][47] Bubbles may form whenever the body experiences a reduction in pressure, but not all bubbles result in DCS.[48] The amount of gas dissolved in a liquid is described by Henry's Law, which indicates that when the pressure of a gas in contact with a liquid is decreased, the amount of that gas dissolved in the liquid will also decrease proportionately.

On ascent from a dive, inert gas comes out of solution in a process called "outgassing" or "offgassing". Under normal conditions, most offgassing occurs by gas exchange in the lungs.[49][50] If inert gas comes out of solution too quickly to allow outgassing in the lungs then bubbles may form in the blood or within the solid tissues of the body. The formation of bubbles in the skin or joints results in milder symptoms, while large numbers of bubbles in the venous blood can cause lung damage.[51] The most severe types of DCS interrupt — and ultimately damage — spinal cord function, leading to paralysis, sensory dysfunction, or death. In the presence of a right-to-left shunt of the heart, such as a patent foramen ovale, venous bubbles may enter the arterial system, resulting in an arterial gas embolism.[5][52] A similar effect, known as ebullism, may occur during explosive decompression, when water vapour forms bubbles in body fluids due to a dramatic reduction in environmental pressure.[53]

Inert gases

The main inert gas in air is nitrogen, but nitrogen is not the only gas that can cause DCS. Breathing gas mixtures such as trimix and heliox include helium, which can also cause decompression sickness. Helium both enters and leaves the body faster than nitrogen, so different decompression schedules are required, but, since helium does not cause narcosis, it is preferred over nitrogen in gas mixtures for deep diving.[54] There is some debate as to the decompression requirements for helium during short-duration dives. Most divers do longer decompressions; however, some groups like the WKPP have been pioneering the use of shorter decompression times by including deep stops.[55]

Any inert gas that is breathed under pressure can form bubbles when the ambient pressure decreases. Very deep dives have been made using hydrogen-oxygen mixtures (hydrox),[56] but controlled decompression is still required to avoid DCS.[57]

Isobaric counterdiffusion

Further information: Isobaric counterdiffusion

DCS can also be caused at a constant ambient pressure when switching between gas mixtures containing different proportions of inert gas. This is known as isobaric counterdiffusion, and presents a problem for very deep dives.[58] For example, after using a very helium-rich trimix at the deepest part of the dive, a diver will switch to mixtures containing progressively less helium and more oxygen and nitrogen during the ascent. Nitrogen diffuses into tissues 2.65 times slower than helium, but is about 4.5 times more soluble. Switching between gas mixtures that have very different fractions of nitrogen and helium can result in "fast" tissues (those tissues that have a good blood supply) actually increasing their total inert gas loading. This is often found to provoke inner ear decompression sickness, as the ear seems particularly sensitive to this effect.[59]

Bubble formation

The location of micronuclei or where bubbles initially form is not known.[60] The most likely mechanisms for bubble formation are tribonucleation, when two surfaces make and break contact (such as in joints), and heterogeneous nucleation, where bubbles are created at a site based on a surface in contact with the liquid. Homogeneous nucleation, where bubbles form within the liquid itself is less likely because it requires much greater pressure differences than experienced in decompression.[60] The spontaneous formation of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces is a possible source of micronuclei, but it is not yet clear if these can grow large enough to cause symptoms as they are very stable.[60]

Once microbubbles have formed, they can grow by either a reduction in pressure or by diffusion of gas into the gas from its surroundings. In the body, bubbles may be located within tissues or carried along with the bloodstream. The speed of blood flow within a blood vessel and the rate of delivery of blood to capillaries (perfusion) are the main factors that determine whether dissolved gas is taken up by tissue bubbles or circulation bubbles for bubble growth.[60]


Decompression sickness should be suspected if any of the symptoms associated with the condition occurs following a drop in pressure, in particular, within 24 hours of diving.[61] In 1995, 95% of all cases reported to Divers Alert Network had shown symptoms within 24 hours.[62] An alternative diagnosis should be suspected if severe symptoms begin more than six hours following decompression without an altitude exposure or if any symptom occurs more than 24 hours after surfacing.[63] The diagnosis is confirmed if the symptoms are relieved by recompression.[63][64] Although MRI or CT can frequently identify bubbles in DCS, they are not as good at determining the diagnosis as a proper history of the event and description of the symptoms.[3]


Underwater diving

Close-up of the LCD display of an Aladin Pro
The display of a basic personal dive computer shows depth, dive time, and decompression information.

To prevent the excess formation of bubbles that can lead to decompression sickness, divers limit their ascent rate—the recommended ascent rate used by popular decompression models is about 10 metres (33 ft) per minute—and carry out a decompression schedule as necessary.[65] This schedule requires the diver to ascend to a particular depth, and remain at that depth until sufficient gas has been eliminated from the body to allow further ascent.[66] Each of these is termed a "decompression stop", and a schedule for a given bottom time and depth may contain one or more stops, or none at all. Dives that contain no decompression stops are called "no-stop dives", but divers usually schedule a short "safety stop" at 3 metres (10 ft), 4.6 metres (15 ft), or 6 metres (20 ft), depending on the training agency.[65][lower-alpha 2]

The decompression schedule may be derived from decompression tables, decompression software, or from dive computers, and these are commonly based upon a mathematical model of the body's uptake and release of inert gas as pressure changes. These models, such as the Bühlmann decompression algorithm, are designed to fit empirical data and provide a decompression schedule for a given depth and dive duration.[67]

Since divers on the surface after a dive still have excess inert gas in their bodies, any subsequent dive before this excess is fully eliminated needs to modify the schedule to take account of the residual gas load from the previous dive. This will result in a shorter available time under water or an increased decompression time during the subsequent dive. The total elimination of excess gas may take many hours, and tables will indicate the time at normal pressures that is required, which may be up to 18 hours.[68]

Decompression time can be significantly shortened by breathing mixtures containing much less inert gas during the decompression phase of the dive (or pure oxygen at stops in 6 metres (20 ft) of water or less). The reason is that the inert gas outgases at a rate proportional to the difference between the partial pressure of inert gas in the diver's body and its partial pressure in the breathing gas; whereas the likelihood of bubble formation depends on the difference between the inert gas partial pressure in the diver's body and the ambient pressure. Reduction in decompression requirements can also be gained by breathing a nitrox mix during the dive, since less nitrogen will be taken into the body than during the same dive done on air.[69]

Following a decompression schedule does not completely protect against DCS. The algorithms used are designed to reduce the probability of DCS to a very low level, but do not reduce it to zero.[70]

Exposure to altitude

One of the most significant breakthroughs in the prevention of altitude DCS is oxygen pre-breathing. Breathing pure oxygen significantly reduces the nitrogen loads in body tissues by reducing the partial pressure of nitrogen in the lungs, which induces diffusion of nitrogen from the blood into the breathing gas, and this effect eventually lowers the concentration of nitrogen in the other tissues of the body. If continued for long enough, and without interruption, this provides effective protection upon exposure to low-barometric pressure environments.[20][21] However, breathing pure oxygen during flight alone (ascent, en route, descent) does not decrease the risk of altitude DCS as the time required for ascent is generally not sufficient to significantly desaturate the slower tissues.[20][21]

Although pure oxygen pre-breathing is an effective method to protect against altitude DCS, it is logistically complicated and expensive for the protection of civil aviation flyers, either commercial or private. Therefore, it is currently used only by military flight crews and astronauts for protection during high-altitude and space operations. It is also used by flight test crews involved with certifying aircraft, and may also be used for high-altitude parachute jumps.

Astronauts aboard the International Space Station preparing for extra-vehicular activity (EVA) "camp out" at low atmospheric pressure, 10.2 psi (0.70 bar), spending eight sleeping hours in the Quest airlock chamber before their spacewalk. During the EVA they breathe 100% oxygen in their spacesuits, which operate at 4.3 psi (0.30 bar),[71] although research has examined the possibility of using 100% O2 at 9.5 psi (0.66 bar) in the suits to lessen the pressure reduction, and hence the risk of DCS.[72]


A large horizontal cylinder with a bank of instruments and monitors
The recompression chamber at the Neutral Buoyancy Lab.

All cases of decompression sickness should be treated initially with 100% oxygen until hyperbaric oxygen therapy (100% oxygen delivered in a high-pressure chamber) can be provided.[73] Mild cases of the "bends" and some skin symptoms may disappear during descent from high altitude; however, it is recommended that these cases still be evaluated. Neurological symptoms, pulmonary symptoms, and mottled or marbled skin lesions should be treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy if seen within 10 to 14 days of development.[74]

Recompression on air was shown to be an effective treatment for minor DCS symptoms by Keays in 1909.[75] Evidence of the effectiveness of recompression therapy utilizing oxygen was first shown by Yarbrough and Behnke,[76] and has since become the standard of care for treatment of DCS.[77] Recompression is normally carried out in a recompression chamber. At a dive site, a riskier alternative is in-water recompression.[78][79][80]

Oxygen first aid has been used as an emergency treatment for diving injuries for years.[81] If given within the first four hours of surfacing, it increases the success of recompression therapy as well as decreasing the number of recompression treatments required.[82] Most fully closed-circuit rebreathers can deliver sustained high concentrations of oxygen-rich breathing gas and could be used as a means of supplying oxygen if dedicated equipment is not available.[83]

It is beneficial to give fluids, as this helps reduce dehydration. It is no longer recommended to administer aspirin, unless advised to do so by medical personnel, as analgesics may mask symptoms. People should be made comfortable and placed in the supine position (horizontal), or the recovery position if vomiting occurs.[61] In the past, both the Trendelenburg position and the left lateral decubitus position (Durant's maneuver) have been suggested as beneficial where air emboli are suspected,[84] but are no longer recommended for extended periods, owing to concerns regarding cerebral edema.[81][85]

The duration of recompression treatment depends on the severity of symptoms, the dive history, the type of recompression therapy used and the patient's response to the treatment. One of the more frequently used treatment schedules is the US Navy Table 6, which provides hyperbaric oxygen therapy with a maximum pressure equivalent to 60 feet (18 m) of seawater for a total time under pressure of 288 minutes, of which 240 minutes are on oxygen and the balance are air breaks to minimise the possibility of oxygen toxicity.[86]

A multiplace chamber is the preferred facility for treatment of decompression sickness as it allows direct physical access to the patient by medical personnel, but monoplace chambers are more widely available and should be used for treatment if a multiplace chamber is not available or transportation would cause significant delay in treatment, as the interval between onset of symptoms and recompression is important to the quality of recovery.[87] It may be necessary to modify the optimum treatment schedule to allow use of a monoplace chamber, but this is usually better than delaying treatment. A US Navy treatment table 5 can be safely performed without air breaks if a built-in breathing system is not available.[87] In most cases the patient can be adequately treated in a monoplace chamber at the receiving hospital.[87]


Immediate treatment with 100% oxygen, followed by recompression in a hyperbaric chamber, will in most cases result in no long-term effects. However, permanent long-term injury from DCS is possible. Three-month follow-ups on diving accidents reported to DAN in 1987 showed 14.3% of the 268 divers surveyed had ongoing symptoms of Type II DCS, and 7% from Type I DCS.[88][89] Long-term follow-ups showed similar results, with 16% having permanent neurological sequelae.[90]


The incidence of decompression sickness is rare, estimated at 2.8 cases per 10,000 dives, with the risk 2.6 times greater for males than females.[3] DCS affects approximately 1,000 U.S. scuba divers per year.[61] In 1999, the Divers Alert Network (DAN) created "Project Dive Exploration" to collect data on dive profiles and incidents. From 1998 to 2002, they recorded 50,150 dives, from which 28 recompressions were required — although these will almost certainly contain incidents of arterial gas embolism (AGE) — a rate of about 0.05%.[2][91]


Society and culture


In the United States, it is common for medical insurance not to cover treatment for the bends that is the result of recreational diving. This is because scuba diving is considered an elective and "high-risk" activity and treatment for decompression sickness is expensive. A typical stay in a recompression chamber will easily cost several thousand dollars, even before emergency transportation is included. As a result, groups such as Divers Alert Network (DAN) offer medical insurance policies that specifically cover all aspects of treatment for decompression sickness at rates of less than $100 per year.[112]

In the United Kingdom, treatment of DCS is provided by the National Health Service. This may occur either at a specialised facility or at a hyperbaric centre based within a general hospital.[113][114]


  1. Inner ear counter diffusion is a rare form of DCS sometimes experienced by divers engaged in extreme deep diving, caused by switching from a helium-rich gas to a nitrogen-rich gas at the start of a decompression stop. Although nitrogen diffuses more slowly than helium, nitrogen is much more soluble than helium and the total inert gas load in some tissues can temporarily exceed the critical supersaturation limit, resulting in bubble formation. The inner ear is particularly susceptible to this effect. Two of the best-recorded instances of it both occurred at Boesmansgat, South Africa — once to Nuno Gomes in an early world record attempt, and later to Don Shirley when he tried to rescue David Shaw on his fateful dive trying to recover the body of Deon Dreyer, who had been one of Gomes's support divers.
  2. Tables based on US Navy tables have a safety stop at 15 feet (4.6 m); BSAC tables have a safety stop at 6 metres (20 ft); Bühlmann tables have a safety stop at 3 metres (10 ft).

See also


  1. 1 2 Francis & Mitchell, Manifestations, p. 578.
  2. 1 2 Pulley, Stephen A (27 November 2007). "Decompression Sickness". Medscape. Retrieved 15 May 2010.
  3. 1 2 3 Marx, p. 1908.
  4. Francis & Mitchell, Manifestations, p. 579.
  5. 1 2 3 Francis, T James R; Smith, DJ (1991). "Describing Decompression Illness". 42nd Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop. 79(DECO)5–15–91. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  6. Francis & Mitchell, Manifestations, p. 580.
  7. U.S. Navy Supervisor of Diving (2008). "Chapter 20: Diagnosis and Treatment of Decompression Sickness and Arterial Gas Embolism". U.S. Navy Diving Manual (PDF). SS521-AG-PRO-010, revision 6. volume 5. U.S. Naval Sea Systems Command. p. 37. Retrieved 15 May 2010.
  8. Powell, p. 71.
  9. Francis & Mitchell, Manifestations, pp. 578–584.
  10. Doolette, David J; Mitchell, Simon J (2003). "Biophysical basis for inner ear decompression sickness". Journal of Applied Physiology. 94 (6): 2145–50. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01090.2002 (inactive 2015-01-12). PMID 12562679. Retrieved 30 September 2014.
  11. Powell, p. 70.
  12. U.S. Navy Supervisor of Diving (2008). U.S. Navy Diving Manual (PDF). SS521-AG-PRO-010, revision 6. vol.5. U.S. Naval Sea Systems Command. pp. 20–25. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  13. TDI Decompression Procedures Manual (Rev 1c), page 38
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Vann, Richard D, ed. (1989). "The Physiological Basis of Decompression". 38th Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop. 75(Phys)6–1–89: 437. Retrieved 15 May 2010.
  15. Benton, BJ (2001). "Acute Decompression Illness (DCI): the Significance of Provocative Dive Profiles". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Abstract. 28 (Supplement). ISSN 1066-2936. OCLC 26915585. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  16. Wong, RM (1999). "Taravana revisited: Decompression illness after breath-hold diving". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 29 (3). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  17. Lippmann & Mitchell, pp. 65–66.
  18. Ohta, Yoshimi; Matsunaga, Hitoshi (February 1974). "Bone lesions in divers". Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. 56B (1): 3–15. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  19. Elliott, David H (1999). "Early Decompression experience: Compressed air work". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 29 (1). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dehart, RL; Davis, JR (2002). Fundamentals Of Aerospace Medicine: Translating Research Into Clinical Applications (3rd Rev ed.). United States: Lippincott Williams And Wilkins. p. 720. ISBN 978-0-7817-2898-0.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Pilmanis, Andrew A (1990). "The Proceedings of the Hypobaric Decompression Sickness Workshop". US Air Force Technical Report. AL-SR-1992-0005. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  22. Vann, Richard D; Torre-Bueno, JR (1984). "A theoretical method for selecting space craft and space suit atmospheres". Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 55 (12): 1097–1102. ISSN 0095-6562. PMID 6151391.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 Butler, WP (2004). "Caisson disease during the construction of the Eads and Brooklyn Bridges: A review". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 31 (4): 445–59. PMID 15686275. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  24. 1 2 "Hudson River Tunnel". Engineering Timelines. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
  25. Gerth, Wayne A; Vann, Richard D (1995). "Statistical Bubble Dynamics Algorithms for Assessment of Altitude Decompression Sickness Incidence". US Air Force Technical Report. TR-1995-0037. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  26. 1 2 Vann, Richard D; Gerth, Wayne A; DeNoble, Petar J; Pieper, Carl F; Thalmann, Edward D (2004). "Experimental trials to assess the risks of decompression sickness in flying after diving". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 31 (4): 431–44. ISSN 1066-2936. OCLC 26915585. PMID 15686274. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  27. Robinson, RR; Dervay, JP; Conkin, Johnny. "An Evidenced-Based Approach for Estimating Decompression Sickness Risk in Aircraft Operations" (PDF). NASA STI Report Series. NASA/TM—1999–209374. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  28. Powell, Michael R (2002). "Decompression limits in commercial aircraft cabins with forced descent". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. Supplement (abstract). Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  29. Brown, JR; Antuñano, Melchor J (14 July 2005). "Altitude-Induced Decompression Sickness" (PDF). AM-400-95/2. Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved 27 June 2010.
  30. Pollock, Neal W; Natoli, Michael J; Gerth, Wayne A; Thalmann, Edward D; Vann, Richard D (November 2003). "Risk of decompression sickness during exposure to high cabin altitude after diving". Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 74 (11): 1163–68. PMID 14620473. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  31. DeNoble, PJ; Vann, RD; Pollock, NW; Uguccioni, DM; Freiberger, JJ; Pieper, CF (2005). "A case-control study of decompression sickness (DCS) and arterial gas embolism (AGE)". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society. Retrieved 29 February 2016.
  32. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fryer, DI (1969). Subatmospheric decompression sickness in man. England: Technivision Services. p. 343. ISBN 978-0-85102-023-5.
  33. Lippmann & Mitchell, p. 232.
  34. 1 2 Bassett, Bruce E (1982). "Decompression Procedures for Flying After Diving, and Diving at Altitudes above Sea Level". US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine Technical Report. SAM-TR-82-47. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  35. Sheffield, Paul J; Vann, Richard D (2002). Flying After Diving Workshop. Proceedings of the DAN 2002 Workshop. United States: Divers Alert Network. p. 127. ISBN 0-9673066-4-7. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  36. Vann, Richard D; Pollock, Neal W; Freiberger, John J; Natoli, Michael J; Denoble, Petar J; Pieper, Carl F (2007). "Influence of bottom time on preflight surface intervals before flying after diving". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 34 (3): 211–20. PMID 17672177. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  37. Lippmann & Mitchell, p. 79.
  38. Egi, SM; Brubakk, Alf O (1995). "Diving at altitude: a review of decompression strategies". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 22 (3): 281–300. ISSN 1066-2936. OCLC 26915585. PMID 7580768. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  39. Walder, Dennis N (1945). "The Surface Tension of the Blood Serum in 'Bends'". Royal Air Force Technical Report.
  40. Lippmann & Mitchell, p. 71.
  41. Moon, Richard E; Kisslo, Joseph (1998). "PFO and decompression illness: An update". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 28 (3). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  42. Lippmann & Mitchell, p. 70.
  43. Karlsson, L; Linnarson, D; Gennser, M; Blogg, SL; Lindholm, Peter (2007). "A case of high doppler scores during altitude decompression in a subject with a fractured arm". Undersea Hyperbaric Medicine. 34 (Supplement). ISSN 1066-2936. OCLC 26915585. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  44. Gerth, Wayne A; Ruterbusch, VL; Long, Edward T (2007). "The Influence of Thermal Exposure on Diver Susceptibility to Decompression Sickness". United States Navy Experimental Diving Unit Technical Report. NEDU-TR-06-07. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  45. Boycott, AE; Damant, JCC (1908). "Experiments on the influence of fatness on susceptibility to caisson disease". Journal of Hygiene. Cambridge University Press. 8 (4): 445–56. doi:10.1017/S0022172400015862. PMC 2167151Freely accessible. PMID 20474366.
  46. Leigh, BC; Dunford, Richard G (2005). "Alcohol use in scuba divers treated for diving injuries: A comparison of decompression sickness and arterial gas embolism" (PDF). Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 29 (Supplement s1): 157A. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2005.tb03524.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 December 2013. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism, Santa Barbara, California, June 2005.
  47. Ackles, KN (1973). "Blood-Bubble Interaction in Decompression Sickness". Defence R&D Canada (DRDC) Technical Report. DCIEM-73-CP-960. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  48. Nishi Brubakk & Eftedal, p. 501.
  49. Kindwall, Eric P; Baz, A; Lightfoot, EN; Lanphier, Edward H; Seireg, A (1975). "Nitrogen elimination in man during decompression". Undersea Biomedical Research. 2 (4): 285–297. ISSN 0093-5387. OCLC 2068005. PMID 1226586. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  50. Kindwall, Eric P (1975). "Measurement of helium elimination from man during decompression breathing air or oxygen". Undersea Biomedical Research. 2 (4): 277–284. ISSN 0093-5387. OCLC 2068005. PMID 1226585. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  51. Francis & Mitchell, Manifestations, pp. 583–584.
  52. Francis & Mitchell, Pathophysiology, pp. 530–541.
  53. Landis, Geoffrey A (19 March 2009). "Explosive Decompression and Vacuum Exposure". Retrieved 30 July 2010.
  54. Hamilton & Thalmann, p. 475.
  55. Wienke, Bruce R; O'Leary, Timothy R (10 October 2002). "Deep stops and deep helium" (PDF). RGBM Technical Series 9. Tampa, Florida: NAUI Technical Diving Operations. Retrieved 27 June 2010.
  56. Fife, William P (1979). "The use of Non-Explosive mixtures of hydrogen and oxygen for diving". Texas A&M University Sea Grant. TAMU-SG-79-201.
  57. Brauer, RW, ed. (1985). "Hydrogen as a Diving Gas". 33rd Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS Publication Number 69(WS–HYD)3–1–87). Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  58. Hamilton & Thalmann, p. 477.
  59. Burton, Steve (December 2004). "Isobaric Counter Diffusion". ScubaEngineer. Retrieved 10 January 2010.
  60. 1 2 3 4 Papadopoulou, Virginie; Eckersley, Robert J; Balestra, Costantino; Karapantsios, Thodoris D; Tang, Meng-Xing (2013). "A critical review of physiological bubble formation in hyperbaric decompression". Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. Elsevier. 191-192 (191–192): 22–30. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2013.02.002.
  61. 1 2 3 Thalmann, Edward D (March–April 2004). "Decompression Illness: What Is It and What Is The Treatment?". Divers Alert Network. Retrieved 3 August 2010.
  62. Divers Alert Network (1997). "Report on Diving Accidents and Fatalities in 1995". Divers Alert Network. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  63. 1 2 Moon, Richard E (1998). "Assessment of patients with decompression illness". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 28 (1). Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  64. Moon, Richard E; Sheffield, Paul J, eds. (1996). "Treatment of Decompression Illness. 45th Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop". UHMS Publication Number WD712. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society: 426. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
  65. 1 2 Hamilton & Thalmann, p. 471.
  66. Hamilton & Thalmann, p. 455.
  67. Hamilton & Thalmann, pp. 456–457.
  68. Hamilton & Thalmann, pp. 471–473.
  69. Hamilton & Thalmann, pp. 474–475.
  70. Hamilton & Thalmann, p. 456.
  71. Nevills, Amiko (2006). "Preflight Interview: Joe Tanner". NASA. Retrieved 26 June 2010.
  72. Webb, James T; Olson, RM; Krutz, RW; Dixon, G; Barnicott, PT (1989). "Human tolerance to 100% oxygen at 9.5 psia during five daily simulated 8-hour EVA exposures". Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 60 (5): 415–21. doi:10.4271/881071. PMID 2730484.
  73. Marx, p. 1912.
  74. Marx, p. 1813.
  75. Keays, FJ (1909). "Compressed air illness, with a report of 3,692 cases". Department of Medicine Publications of Cornell University Medical College. 2: 1–55.
  76. Yarbrough, OD; Behnke, Albert R (1939). "The treatment of compressed air illness using oxygen". Journal of industrial hygiene and toxicology. 21: 213–18. ISSN 0095-9030.
  77. Berghage, Thomas E; Vorosmarti Jr, James; Barnard, EEP (1978). "Recompression treatment tables used throughout the world by government and industry". US Naval Medical Research Center Technical Report. NMRI-78-16. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
  78. Edmonds, Carl (1998). "Underwater oxygen for treatment of decompression sickness: A review". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 25 (3). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801. Retrieved 5 April 2008.
  79. Pyle, Richard L; Youngblood, David A (1995). "In-water Recompression as an emergency field treatment of decompression illness". AquaCorp. 11. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
  80. Kay, Edmond; Spencer, Merrill P (1999). In water recompression. 48th Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop. United States: Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society. p. 108. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
  81. 1 2 Moon & Gorman, p. 616.
  82. Longphre, John M; DeNoble, Petar J; Moon, Richard E; Vann, Richard D; Freiberger, John J (2007). "First aid normobaric oxygen for the treatment of recreational diving injuries". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 34 (1): 43–49. ISSN 1066-2936. OCLC 26915585. PMID 17393938. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
  83. Goble, Steve (2003). "Rebreathers". Journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society. 33 (2): 98–102. Retrieved 25 July 2010.
  84. O'Dowd, Liza C; Kelley, Mark A (October 2000). "Air embolism". Chinese Medical Biotechnology Information Network. Peking University. Retrieved 8 August 2010.
  85. Bove, Alfred A (April 2009). "Arterial Gas Embolism: Injury During Diving or Work in Compressed Air". Merck Manual Professional. Merk Sharp and Dohme. Retrieved 8 August 2010.
  86. U.S. Navy Supervisor of Diving (2008). "Chapter 20: Diagnosis and Treatment of Decompression Sickness and Arterial Gas Embolism". U.S. Navy Diving Manual (PDF). SS521-AG-PRO-010, revision 6. volume 5. U.S. Naval Sea Systems Command. p. 41. Retrieved 15 May 2010.
  87. 1 2 3 Kindwall, EP; Goldmann, RW; Thombs, PA (1988). "Use of the Monoplace vs. Multiplace Chamber in the Treatment of Diving Diseases.". Journal of Hyperbaric Medicine; 3(1). Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc. pp. 5–10. Retrieved 25 February 2016.
  88. Bennett, Peter B; Dovenbarger, Joel A; Corson, Karen (1991). Nashimoto, I; Lanphier, EH, eds. "What is Bends?". 43rd Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society. 80(BENDS)6–1–91: 13–20. Retrieved 30 May 2010. |chapter= ignored (help)
  89. Dovenbarger, Joel A (1988). "Report on Decompression Illness and Diving Fatalities (1988)". Divers Alert Network. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  90. Desola, J (1989). "Epidemiological review of 276 dysbaric diving accidents". Proceedings XV Meeting European Undersea Biomedical Society: 209.
  91. "Project Dive Exploration: Project Overview". Divers Alert Network. 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  92. Acott, Chris (1999). "The diving "Law-ers": A brief resume of their lives". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society. 29 (1). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  93. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Acott, Chris (1999). "A brief history of diving and decompression illness". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society. 29 (2). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  94. Marx, p. 1903.
  95. Smith, Andrew Heermance (1886). The Physiological, Pathological and Therapeutical Effects of Compressed Air. George S. Davis. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  96. McCullough, David (June 2001). The Great Bridge: The Epic Story of the Building of the Brooklyn Bridge. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-7432-1737-3. Retrieved 30 September 2014.
  97. 1 2 Hill, Leonard Erskine (1912). Caisson sickness, and the physiology of work in compressed air. London: Arnold. ISBN 1-113-96529-0. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  98. Phillips, John L (1998). The bends : compressed air in the history of science, diving, and engineering. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. pp. 95–97. ISBN 978-0300071252.
  99. Staff (25 July 1904). "Ocean Treasure". Daily News. Daily News, Perth, WA. p. 6. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
  100. Boycott, AE; Damant, GCC; Haldane, John Scott (1908). "Prevention of compressed air illness". Journal of Hygiene. 8 (3): 342–443. doi:10.1017/S0022172400003399. PMC 2167126Freely accessible. PMID 20474365. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  101. Jones, Natalie (28 February 2015). "Pearling industry marks 100 years of treating the bends". ABC News. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
  102. Scott, David (1931). Seventy fathoms deep with the divers of the salvage ship Artiglio. London: Faber & Faber.
  103. Scott, David (1932). The Egypt's Gold. London: Faber & Faber.
  104. 1 2 Thalmann, Edward D (1990). Bennett, Peter B; Moon, Richard E, eds. "Diving Accident Management". 41st Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society. 78(DIVACC)12–1–90. Retrieved 30 May 2010. |chapter= ignored (help)
  105. Behnke, Albert R; Shaw, Louis A; Messer, Anne C; Thomson, Robert M; Motley, E Preble (31 January 1936). "The circulatory and respiratory disturbances of acute compressed-air illness and the administration of oxygen as a therapeutic measure". American Journal of Physiology. 114 (3): 526–533. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  106. Davis Jefferson C, Sheffield Paul J, Schuknecht L, Heimbach RD, Dunn JM, Douglas G, Anderson GK; Sheffield; Schuknecht; Heimbach; Dunn; Douglas; Anderson (August 1977). "Altitude decompression sickness: hyperbaric therapy results in 145 cases". Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 48 (8): 722–30. PMID 889546.
  107. Workman, Robert D (1957). "Calculation of air saturation decompression tables". Navy Experimental Diving Unit Technical Report. NEDU-RR-11-57. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  108. 1 2 Carson, Daryl. "Dive Computer Evolution". Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  109. Golding, F Campbell; Griffiths, P; Hempleman, HV; Paton, WDM; Walder, DN (July 1960). "Decompression sickness during construction of the Dartford Tunnel". British Journal of Industrial Medicine. 17 (3): 167–80. doi:10.1136/oem.17.3.167. PMC 1038052Freely accessible. PMID 13850667.
  110. Weathersby, Paul K; Homer, Louis D; Flynn, Edward T (September 1984). "On the likelihood of decompression sickness". Journal of Applied Physiology. 57 (3): 815–25. PMID 6490468. Retrieved 27 April 2009.
  111. Bühlmann, Albert A (1984). Decompression–Decompression Sickness. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-13308-9.
  112. "DAN Insurance". Divers Alert Network. 2003. Retrieved 25 July 2010.
  113. "NHS Funded Treatment". London Hyperbaric Ltd. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
  114. Wilson, Colin M; Sayer, Martin DJ (2011). "Transportation of divers with decompression illness on the west coast of Scotland". Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine. 41 (2): 64–9. PMID 21848109.


  • Francis, T James R; Mitchell, Simon J (2003). "10.4: Pathophysiology of Decompression Sickness". In Brubakk, Alf O.; Neuman, Tom S. Bennett and Elliott's physiology and medicine of diving (5th Revised ed.). United States: Saunders. pp. 530–556. ISBN 978-0-7020-2571-6. OCLC 51607923. 
  • Francis, T James R; Mitchell, Simon J (2003). "10.6: Manifestations of Decompression Disorders". In Brubakk, Alf O; Neuman, Tom S. Bennett and Elliott's physiology and medicine of diving (5th Revised ed.). United States: Saunders. pp. 578–599. ISBN 978-0-7020-2571-6. OCLC 51607923. 
  • Hamilton, Robert W; Thalmann, Edward D (2003). "10.2: Decompression Practice". In Brubakk, Alf O; Neuman, Tom S. Bennett and Elliott's physiology and medicine of diving (5th Revised ed.). United States: Saunders. pp. 455–500. ISBN 978-0-7020-2571-6. OCLC 51607923. 
  • Lippmann, John; Mitchell, Simon (2005). Deeper into Diving (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: J L Publications. ISBN 978-0-9752290-1-9. 
  • Marx, John (2010). Rosen's emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice (7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Mosby/Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-323-05472-0. 
  • Moon, Richard E; Gorman, Des F (2003). "10.7: Treatment of the Decompression Disorders". In Brubakk, Alf O; Neuman, Tom S. Bennett and Elliott's physiology and medicine of diving (5th Revised ed.). United States: Saunders. pp. 600–650. ISBN 978-0-7020-2571-6. OCLC 51607923. 
  • Nishi, Ron Y; Brubakk, Alf O; Eftedal, Olav S (2003). "10.3: Bubble Detection". In Brubakk, Alf O; Neuman, Tom S. Bennett and Elliott's physiology and medicine of diving (5th Revised ed.). United States: Saunders. p. 501. ISBN 978-0-7020-2571-6. OCLC 51607923. 
  • Powell, Mark (2008). Deco for Divers. Southend-on-Sea: Aquapress. ISBN 978-1-905492-07-7. 

External links

Look up decompression sickness in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.