Burns v. Reed

Burns v. Reed

Argued November 28, 1990
Decided May 30, 1991
Full case name Cathy Burns, Petitioner v. Rick Reed
Citations

500 U.S. 478 (more)

111 S. Ct. 1934; 114 L. Ed. 2d 547; 1991 U.S. LEXIS 3018; 59 U.S.L.W. 4536; 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3961; 91 Daily Journal DAR 6290
Holding
A state prosecuting attorney is absolutely immune from liability for damages under § 1983 for participating in a probable cause hearing, but not for giving legal advice to the police.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Case opinions
Majority White, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter
Concur/dissent Scalia, joined by Blackmun; Marshall (part III)
Laws applied
42 U.S.C. § 1983

Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case. A prosecutor was absolutely immune from damages based upon positions taken in a probable cause hearing for a search warrant. The same prosecutor was not held entitled to immunity for giving legal advice to the police about the legality of an investigative practice.[1]

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

References

  1. ↑ Burns v. Reed, ["Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-08-09. Retrieved 2009-06-02. 478 F.2d] (1991).

External links


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/11/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.