Alain de Benoist

Alain de Benoist

Alain de Benoist in 2012
Born (1943-12-11) 11 December 1943
Tours, Indre-et-Loire, France
Alma mater University of Paris
School Nouvelle Droite
Notable ideas
Modernization and secularization of Christian Values, Repaganization of the West, Pensée unique, Nouvelle Droite, Ethnopluralism
Coat of arms of House de Benoist

Alain de Benoist (French: [də bənwa]; born 11 December 1943) is a French academic, philosopher,[1] a founder of the Nouvelle Droite (New Right), and head of the French think tank GRECE. Benoist is a critic of neoliberalism,[2] free markets, democracy and egalitarianism.[3]


Alain de Benoist was born in Saint-Symphorien (now part of Tours, Indre-et-Loire) and attended the Sorbonne. He has studied law, philosophy, sociology, and the history of religions. He is an admirer of Europe and paganism.

Benoist is the editor of two journals: Nouvelle Ecole (New School) since 1968, and Krisis since 1988. His writings have appeared in Mankind Quarterly, Tyr, Chronicles, and various newspapers such as Le Figaro. The New Left journal Telos has also published Benoist's work. In 1978, he received the Prix de l'essai from the Académie française for his book Vu de droite: Anthologie critique des idées contemporaines (Copernic, 1977). He has published more than 50 books, including On Being a Pagan (Ultra, 2005, ISBN 0-9720292-2-2).

In 2013 he spoke at a National Policy Institute[4] gathering and gave an interview with American Renaissance.[5] Prior to that, English translations of his books began to be published by Arktos Media.[6]


From being close to French-Algerian movements at the beginning of his writings in 1970, he moved to attacks on globalisation, unrestricted mass immigration and liberalism as being ultimately fatal to the existence of Europe through their divisiveness and internal faults. His influences include Antonio Gramsci,[7] Ernst Jünger, Jean Baudrillard, Georges Dumézil, Ernest Renan, José Ortega y Gasset, Vilfredo Pareto, Guy Debord, Arnold Gehlen, Stéphane Lupasco, Helmut Schelsky, Konrad Lorenz, the German Conservative Revolutionary movement and the Non-conformists of the 1930s.[8]

Against the American liberal idea of a melting pot, Benoist is in favour of separate civilisations and cultures: "I favor a pluralistic world, a pluriversum, which reconstitutes the world around a certain number of great continental blocs. Only the advent of a multipolar world will preserve human and cultural diversity and regulate globalization in a way not exclusively favorable to the interests of a single dominant power. I do not believe in Huntington's clash-of-civilizations thesis: Civilizations are not unitary or homogeneous blocs and no miracle will turn them into the principal agents of international relations".[9] He opposed Jean-Marie Le Pen (even though many people influenced by Benoist support him), racism and antisemitism.[10] He has opposed Arab immigration to France, while supporting ties with Islamic culture.[11] He favors "ethnopluralism", in which organic, ethnic cultures and nations must live and develop independently.[12]

He also opposes Christianity as inherently intolerant, theocratic and bent on persecution.[13] He said, "All told, I do not think that one should be pleased by the appearance of Christianity and its development", and goes on to say, "Christianity is not a unitary block. St. Francis of Assisi and Torquemada gave the same Church quite different faces! There is nothing wrong with preferring the former. I have written a book entitled On Being a Pagan, but that has never prevented me from appreciating Catholic authors like Léon Bloy, Charles Péguy, Georges Bernanos, and Gustave Thibon, or from feeling agreement with certain aspects of the social teachings of the Church." He also opposes reconstructivism: "The New Right has never preached a “return” to paganism or a “return” to roots, or a return to anything for that matter. Instead, we wish to go beyond current society, but we wish to envision the future though the lens of a clear consciousness of the past. These two approaches are quite different: recurrence is not synonymous with return! Let us say simply that one can “futurize” the present only by “historicizing” the past."

De Benoist has made pointed criticism of the United States: He has been (mis)quoted as saying "Better to wear the helmet of a Red Army soldier," he wrote in 1982, "than to live on a diet of hamburgers in Brooklyn."[14] (Preferred translation: "To have to wear someday the cap of the Red Army would be an awful perspective [in French: "une perspective affreuse"]. This is not a reason to have the desire to spend the rest of our life living on a diet of hamburgers in Broolyn's [sic] surroundings." [15]) In 1991, he complained that European supporters of the first Gulf War were "collaborators of the American order."[16]

Benoist has devoted an entire book to refuting biological racism (Des animaux et des hommes), and has written three books against racism. His views on racism are thus: “Racism is a theory that postulates, either that qualitative inequalities exist among the races such that one can distinguish generally ‘superior’ and ‘inferior’ races, or that the value of an individual is defined entirely by his or her racial belonging, or again that race constitutes the central determining factor in human history. These three postulates may be held together or separately. All three of them are false” (Manifesto). He opposes political violence, saying he is building "a school of thought, not a political movement."[17] While he has complained that nations like the United States suffer from "homogenization," he has also distanced himself from some of Jean-Marie Le-Pen's views on immigration.[3]

Benoist considers himself both left and right-wing ("I happen to define myself as a “man of right-left,” as a rightist from the left and a leftist from the right, i.e., as an intellectual who simultaneously refers to the ideas of the left and the values of the right."[18]), and throughout his career has continued to adapt and alter his views: in his preference for Martin Heidegger over his first influence, Friedrich Nietzsche; his support of multiculturalism rather than disappearance of immigrants' identities (though he does not support immigration itself); his interest in ecology; and a less aggressive view of Christianity. He has said that he hopes to see free-debate and greater popular participation in democracy, although he is also critical of modern liberal-democracy.[19]

Benoist is also a proponent of the idea of integral federalism, in which the nation state is surpassed, giving way to regional identities and a common continental one at once ("What the ND wants is a federal Europe, founded on the principle of subsidiarity and participatory democracy at every level, where the political clearly predominates over the economic, where the financial markets do not rule everything, and where commercial and merchant values are put back in their proper place"[20]). This would be distinct from what he sees as the consumerism and materialism of American society, as well as the bureaucracy and repression of the Soviet Union. This vision looks to a Europe of specific peoples, each with their own cultures and heritages.[21]

His critics, such as Thomas Sheehan, argue that Benoist has developed a novel restatement of fascism.[22] Roger Griffin, using an ideal type definition of fascism which includes "populist ultra-nationalism" and "palingenesis" (heroic rebirth), argues that the Nouvelle Droite draws on such fascist ideologues as Armin Mohler in a way that allows Nouvelle Droite ideologues such as de Benoist to claim a "metapolitical" stance, but which nonetheless has residual fascist ideological elements.[23] Benoist's critics also claim his views recall Nazi attempts to replace German Christianity with its own paganism.[24]

Selected bibliography

English titles include: – "On being a pagan" (Ultra 2004) – "The problem of democracy" (Arktos 2011) – "Beyond human rights" (Arktos 2011) - "Carl Schmitt Today" (Arktos 2013) – Other titles in english translation forthcoming from Arktos Media.[6]


  1. ″A big splash from France's new wave from the right″, The Economist, 14 July 1979
  2. de Benoist, Alain. "Preface: The New Right: Forty Years After". In Sunic, Tomislav. Against Democracy and Equality. ISBN 978-1-907166-25-9. In contrast, on this side of the Atlantic, a liberal is primarily a spokesman of individualism, a supporter of free trade, and an opponent of the state (and also a supporter of America).
  3. 1 2 Trouble on the right; recent gains by the extreme-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen have left conservatives and moderates confused about whether to imitate or attack him; France The Atlantic February 1985
  4. Video on YouTube
  5. ""We Are at the End of Something" | American Renaissance". 2013-11-22. Retrieved 2015-10-22.
  6. 1 2 "Alain de Benoist - Our Authors". Retrieved 2015-10-22.
  7. ″The Marcuse factor″, Modern Age, 22 March 2005.
  8. ″Posthistoire: Has History Come to an End?″, CLIO, 1 January 1994.
  9. "European Son : An Interview with Alain de Benoist" (PDF). Retrieved 2015-10-22.
  10. ″Speaking Terms; Europe's Left And Right Are Too Divided To Even Talk About It″, Chicago Tribune, 13 December 1993.
  11. Under cover story The Guardian (London) 14 August 1987.
  12. ″Making hate safe again in Europe: right cultural revolutionaries″, The Nation, 19 September 1994.
  13. Intolerance, American-Style;Given This Country's History Of Religious Animosities, Thomas Fleming Writes Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pennsylvania) 21 December 1997
  14. Paris shrugs off Mickey Mouse's cultural imperialism The Independent (London) 12 February 1991
  15. de Benoist, Alain (1982). Orientaions pour des annees decisives (per website ed.). Labyrinthe. p. 76. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
  16. Rone Tempest, "French Revive a Pastime: Fretting About U.S. 'Imperialism' : Reaction: Talk of 'secret agendas' surfaces on the left and the right. Some chafe at their country's secondary role in the Gulf. Others worry about diminished European influence," Los Angeles Times, 15 February 1991.
  17. France;Ideas and bombs The Economist 23 August 1980
  18. "THE EUROPEAN NEW RIGHT FORTY YEARS LATER: TOMISLAV SUNIC'S Against Democracy and Equality" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 July 2015. Retrieved 2015-10-22.
  19. Benoist, Alain de (Summer 2003). "Democracy Revisited: The Ancients and the Moderns" (PDF). The Occidental Quarterly. 3 (2): 47–58.
  20. "Alain de Benoist Answers Tamir Bar-On" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 July 2015. Retrieved 2015-10-22.
  21. The disharmonic convergence: the far left and the far right as strange bedfellows,s Whole Earth Review 22 June 1988
  22. Sheehan, Thomas (Spring 1981). "Myth and Violence: The Fascism of Julius Evola and Alain de Benoist". Social Research. 48 (1): 45–73. Pages 66–67: To summarize: De Benoist's fascism is at odds with Evola's metaphysics but agrees with his social and political philosophy.... [F]or de Benoist, the organic State is an ideal that men can set for themselves and perhaps, with force, establish.
  23. Griffin, Roger (2000). "Between metapolitics and apoliteia: the Nouvelle Droite's strategy for conserving the fascist vision in the 'interregnum'". Modern & Contemporary France. 8 (1): 35–53. doi:10.1080/096394800113349.
  24. Sunic, Tomislav (Winter 1995). "Marx, Moses, and the Pagans in the Secular City". CLIO. 24 (2): 169–188. In the age that is heavily laced with the Biblical message, many modern pagan thinkers, for their criticism of biblical monotheism, have been attacked and stigmatized either as unrepentant atheists or as spiritual standard-bearers of fascism. Particularly Nietzsche, Heidegger, and more recently Alain de Benoist came under attack for allegedly espousing the philosophy which, for their contemporary detractors, recalled the earlier national socialist attempts to "dechristianize" and "repaganize" Germany. See notably the works by Alfred Rosenberg, Der Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts(München: Hoheneichen Verlag, 1933). Also worth noting is the name of Wilhelm Hauer, Deutscher Gottschau (Stuttgart: Karl Gutbrod, 1934), who significantly popularized Indo-European mythology among national socialists: on pages 240–54 Hauer discusses the difference between Judeo-Christian Semitic beliefs and European paganism.


Further reading

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/7/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.