Comparison of orthotics

Podiatrists have molded custom orthotics to address patients foot malformations. Over the years they have developed numerous means to create the basis for their molds; plaster casts, foam box impressions, or three-dimensional computer imaging. None is very accurate: all produce proper fit under 80% of the time.[1][2]

Alzner's development

After suffering foot pain from frostbite as a conscript on the Russian front in World War II, Romanian born Dr. Georg Alzner self medicated his own solution, reverse engineering what he termed the ideal foot. His arch supports formed normal adult human bones into the correct positions so the four arches of the foot worked properly. In 1948, he released his own line of orthotics based on this principle.[3] He also discovered how restoring the proper shape to the arches of the foot had a chain reaction effect of restoring proper balance to the rest of the body.

“The body functions as one unit, [and] if one member of the body does not function well, the whole body suffers. By treating the whole body, not just one part, we can alleviate the problem.”
Georg Alzner[4]

Alzner's design supported the arches of the foot, while (once positioned) leaving the forefoot and toes free to move and work. Alzner moved to Canada in the early 1960s,[5] received his patent in 1970[6] and sold his products in one on one situations like fairs, eventually selling his company to satisfied customer Donald Airey. Airey tried to expand the marketing of the product to a mass market,[7] bringing his product to Joe Polifroni in 1991. Polifroni's company, Rosalin Johnson and Andrew Hecker produced Feet Facts which became the longest running infomercial in history. The success of the infomercial led to the formation of the Good Feet Stores chain, expanding to 265 stores worldwide and creating an entire new market sector. The success of the Good Feet Stores led to competitors and knock offs.[8][9] Polifroni has continued research and development, patenting many new versions.[10][11]

Styles

Manufacturers of these products choose various materials.

The firm or flexible models might require a period of adjustment. Depending on the severity of the arch collapse and the body's previous conditioning in response to that collapse, sudden readjustment can seem painful. Many attribute the feeling to walking on a walnut. It is recommended new users build up to wearing firm arch supports, starting with only a couple of hours the first day and adding an hour each successive day until the foot is adjusted to full-time usage. Your foot will tell you when it is too much. Don't gut it out and wear it when it is painful, this could lead to an injury. To mitigate this adjustment period, many manufacturers sell covering pads or have different gradations to build up to solid support. Some manufacturers cover their products in leather, which somewhat moderates the intensity of the correction while also adding to the stylistic look.

Most shoe manufacturers do not design for the extra space occupied by the presence of an orthotic. Arch supports can be more than a centimeter in thickness. The expansion of the orthotic market has caused an expansion of the extra depth shoe market, beyond the diabetic shoes. Thinner arch supports obviously are able to fit into a wider range of common shoes. Soft supports will collapse themselves under the weight of the body above and the tightness of the shoe surrounding them.

General information

This table gives basic general information about the different over the counter arch supports:

Firm supports

Product Style Contour Thickness Year of release Leather available Notes
Alznner Orthotics Firm Alzner 11mm 1948 Also has Barefoot, a less durable model
Foot Supports International
Balance series
Flexible Polifroni 2mm 2009 Yes Has 3 models of varying metatarsal arch intensity
Forward Arch Firm Alzner clone 11mm 2007
Good Feet Firm Polifroni 11mm 2001 Yes
Good Feet Flex Flexible Polifroni 5mm 2003 Yes
Natural Foot Firm Alzner clone 11mm
Phase 4 Firm Alzner clone 11mm
Travel Feet Flexible Polifroni 2mm 2015 Has 2 models of varying metatarsal arch intensity in one combined pack
Walk Fit Firm 11mm Has insert plugs to change metatarsal arch intensity

Soft supports

Product Style Contour Year of release Notes
Air Plus Silicone gel Has numerous models ranging from full length pads to heel pads
Amope Silicone gel Has numerous models ranging from full length pads to heel pads
Barefoot Science Foam rubber Full length pad 2001[12] Has a variety of pluggable rubber inserts to allow users change shape
Dr. Anderson Embedded pads with elastic foot wraps Has several models
Dr. Koyama Memory foam Has full length pads and a variety of wraps for different areas
Dr. Scholl Silicone gel 1995 Has numerous models ranging from full length pads to heel pads
Firm Foam Foam rubber
FootMatters Foam rubber
HappyStep Foam rubber/Gel Full length pad
Hydrofeet Liquid filled memory foam 2013[13]
Job Site Foam rubber pads Full length pads Has several full length pad varieties
Kaps Leather or foam rubber Embedded pads Has a variety of models from full length to a single arch pad
Netlab Soft Gel Has numerous models ranging from full length pads to heel pads
Pedag Leather or foam rubber Embedded pads 1955[14] Has a variety of models from full length to a single arch pad
Power Step Foam rubber Full length pad
Profoot Silicone gel, Memory foam 1986[15] Has several models of different lengths and materials
Shoes Silicone Silicone gel
Spenco Foam rubber 1967[16] Has several models from full length to specific area pads (heel, ball of foot)
Strutz Leather Embedded pads with elastic foot wraps 2012[17] Has several models
Super Feet Full length pads Has several models, even sandals
Turf Toe Plate Carbon fiber Full length flat pad
Vionic EVA rubber like plastic 1979[18] Has various designs from heel cup to full length

References

  1. Ingraham, Paul (December 22, 2014). "Orthotics Review: A consumer's guide to the science and controversies of orthotics, special shoes, and other (allegedly) corrective foot devices".
  2. Telfer S.; Gibson KS; Hennessy K; Steultjens MP; Woodburn J. (2012). "Computer-aided design of customized foot orthoses: reproducibility and effect of method used to obtain foot shape". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 93 (5): 863–70. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.019. PMID 22541310.
  3. "About Georg Alzner". alznerrdmt.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  4. "About Georg Alzner". bioorthotics.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  5. "History of the Alzner Orthotic - Forward Arch Corrective Orthotics". forwardarch.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  6. "Patent Images". pdfpiw.uspto.gov. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  7. "Bio Orthotics Home". bioorthotics.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  8. "Alznner®產品訊息 Alznner®艾氏矯正鞋墊". alznner.com.tw. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  9. "www.RightArch2U.com". rightarch2u.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  10. "United States Patent and Trademark Office". web.archive.org. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  11. "United States Patent and Trademark Office". web.archive.org. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  12. "Patent US6301807 - Rehabilitative shoe insole device - Google Patents". google.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  13. "About Us - HydroFeet - Hydrofeet". hydrofeet.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  14. "pedag USA® | Arch Supports | Insoles | Foot Care | Shoe Care". pedagusa.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  15. "About PROFOOT®". profoot.co. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  16. "Spenco Medical -". spenco.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  17. "United States Patent and Trademark Office". web.archive.org. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  18. "About Vionic Shoes". vionicshoes.com. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/20/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.